This category needs an editor. We encourage you to help if you are qualified.
Volunteer, or read more about what this involves.
Related categories

4507 found
Order:
1 — 50 / 4507
Material to categorize
  1. Reliability Goes in Long Before the Wrapper Goes On.Ao Adams - 1968 - In Peter Koestenbaum (ed.), Proceedings. [San Jose? Calif.. pp. 16.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2. An Overlooked Argument for Epistemic Conservatism.J. E. Adler - 1996 - Analysis 56 (2):80-84.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (10 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3. The Rehabilitation of Global Scenarios in Epistemological Reliabilism.Modesto Manuel Gómez Alonso - 2011 - Cuadernos Salmantinos de Filosofía 38:329-350.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4. Virtue and Knowledge.William P. Alston - 2000 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 60 (1):185-189.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  5. Empiricism and Analysis.Peter Anton - 1961 - Dissertation, Indiana University
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6. Justification, Truth, and Reliability.Robert Audi - 1988 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 49 (1):1-29.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  7. The Foundations of Empirical Knowledge.J. B. & Alfred J. Ayer - 1941 - Journal of Philosophy 38 (8):219.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  8. A Reliability Theory of Epistemic Justification.Ralph Neil Baergen - 1990 - Dissertation, Syracuse University
    The claim that the epistemic status of a belief corresponds to the reliability of the process by which it was formed is developed and defended. In the course of this, a variety of conceptual and methodological matters are addressed. Notably, the role of the sciences, particularly experimental psychology and cognitive science, in epistemology is explored, and the claim that factual disciplines can have no bearing upon a normative project is considered and rejected. Also, the suggestion that psychology should entirely replace (...)
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9. Paratheism: A Proof That God Neither Exists nor Does Not Exist.Steven James Bartlett - 2016 - Willamette University Faculty Research Website: Http://Www.Willamette.Edu/~Sbartlet/Documents/Bartlett_Paratheism_A%20Proof%20that%20God%20neither%2 0Exists%20nor%20Does%20Not%20Exist.Pdf.
    Theism and its cousins, atheism and agnosticism, are seldom taken to task for logical-epistemological incoherence. This paper provides a condensed proof that not only theism, but atheism and agnosticism as well, are all of them conceptually self-undermining, and for the same reason: All attempt to make use of the concept of “transcendent reality,” which here is shown not only to lack meaning, but to preclude the very possibility of meaning. In doing this, the incoherence of theism, atheism, and agnosticism is (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10. Review: Bonjour's Dilemma. [REVIEW]Michael Bergmann - 2006 - Philosophical Studies 131 (3):679 - 693.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11. Contextualism and the Background of (Philosophical) Justification.Christian Beyer - 2007 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 74 (1):291-305.
    I propose to apply a version of contextualism about knowledge to the special case that represents the topic of this volume. I begin by motivating my preferred version of contextualism, which may be labelled as conventionalist contextualism; here I start from a well-known problem that besets epistemic internalism (section I). Following this, I pose a problem for conventionalist contextualism and argue that it can be solved by invoking, first, the idea of what I shall call the lifewordly background of epistemic (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12. The Scatter of the Reliability Factor of Roller Bearing Dimensioning, and its Practical Aspects.B. Bir - 1968 - In Peter Koestenbaum (ed.), Proceedings. [San Jose? Calif.. pp. 39.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13. An Examination of the Philosophical Methods of G.E. Moore.Richard Macartney Blackstone - 1968 - Dissertation, Brown University
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14. Laurence BonJour I Ernest Sosa, Epistemic Justification.Laura Blažetić - 2003 - Prolegomena 2 (2):251-256.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15. Empiricism and After.Jim Bogen - unknown
    Familiar versions of empiricism overemphasize and misconstrue the importance of perceptual experience. I discuss their main shortcomings and sketch an alternative framework for thinking about how human sensory systems contribute to scientific knowledge.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16. Précis of Fear of Knowledge.Paul Boghossian - 2008 - Philosophical Studies 141 (3):377-378.
    Fear of Knowledge was in many ways an exercise in foolhardiness. It was to be a short book, accessible to the general reader, that would treat some of the trickiest issues in the foundations theory of knowledge, but that would nevertheless not seriously shortchange the subtleties that they involve. Someone should have warned me.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17. Against Epistemic Circularity.Patrick Bondy & Kevin Delaplante - manuscript
    One finds a surprising number of defenses of the legitimacy of some kinds of question-begging arguments or beliefs in the literature. Without wanting to deny the importance of dialectical analyses of begging the question, what I do here is explore the epistemic side of the issue. In particular, I want to explore the legitimacy of “epistemically circular” arguments and beliefs. My tentative conclusion is that epistemically circular arguments and beliefs are never legitimate. *Note: this is an unpublished manuscript presented at (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18. Apriority and Metajustification in BonJour Structure of Empirical Knowledge-Reply.L. Bonjour - 1990 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 50 (4):779-782.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19. Paul Ziff, Epistemic Analysis: A Coherence Theory of Knowledge Reviewed By.Laurence BonJour - 1985 - Philosophy in Review 5 (9):410-412.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20. The Coherence Theory of Empirical Knowledge.Laurence Bonjour - 1976 - Philosophical Studies 30 (5):281 - 312.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   14 citations  
  21. Epistemic Justification, Rights, and Permissibility.Booth Anthony & Peels Rik - 2012 - Logos and Episteme 3 (3):405-411.
    Can we understand epistemic justification in terms of epistemic rights? In this paper, we consider two arguments for the claim that we cannot and in doing so, we provide two arguments for the claim that we can. First, if, as many think, William James is right that the epistemic aim is to believe all true propositions and not to believe any false propositions, then there are likely to be situations in which believing a proposition serves one of these goals, whereas (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22. Kristoffer Ahlstrom-Vij , Epistemic Paternalism: A Defence . Reviewed By.Giacomo Borbone - 2014 - Philosophy in Review 34 (6):282-283.
  23. In Defense of Proper Functionalism: Cognitive Science Takes on Swampman.Kenny Boyce & Andrew Moon - 2016 - Synthese 193 (9):2987–3001.
    According to proper functionalist theories of warrant, a belief is warranted only if it is formed by cognitive faculties that are properly functioning according to a good, truth-aimed design plan, one that is often thought to be specified either by intentional design or by natural selection. A formidable challenge to proper functionalist theories is the Swampman objection, according to which there are scenarios involving creatures who have warranted beliefs but whose cognitive faculties are not properly functioning, or are poorly designed, (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  24. The Reliability of Tradition.Johannes Bronkhorst - 2005 - In Federico Squarcini (ed.), Boundaries, Dynamics and Construction of Traditions in South Asia. Firenze University Press and Munshiram Manoharlal. pp. 63--76.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25. Circular Justifications.Harold I. Brown - 1994 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1994:406 - 414.
    The thesis of this paper is that philosophers are often too hasty in rejecting justifications because the argument that yields the justification is circular. Circularity is distinguished from vicious circularity and several examples are examined in which a proposed justification is circular in a precise sense, but not viciously circular. These include an observational procedure which could yield a velocity in excess of the velocity of light even though the impossibility of such velocities is assumed at a key step in (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  26. Non-Inferential Justification and Epistemic Circularity.J. Brown - 2004 - Analysis 64 (4):339-348.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27. Wer hat ein Problem mit irrationalen Präferenzen? Entscheidungstheorie und Überlegungsgleichgewicht.Georg Brun - 2009 - Studia Philosophica 68:11-41.
    Decision theory explicates norms of rationality for deriving preferences from preferences and beliefs. Empirical studies have found that actual preferences regularly violate these norms, launching a debate on whether this shows that subjects are prone to certain forms of irrationality or that decision theory needs to be revised. It has been claimed that such a revision is necessitated by the fact that normative uses of decision theory must be justified by a reflective equilibrium. The paper discusses three points. First, the (...)
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28. Review of Geaney's On the Epistemology of the Senses in Early Chinese Thought. [REVIEW]Brian Bruya - 2003 - China Review International 10 (1):157-164.
    This is a full length review in which I discuss the strengths and weaknesses of Jane Geaney's On the Epistemology of the Senses in Early Chinese Thought. Geaney's strengths lie in her refusal to import Western epistemological presuppositions into depictions of Early Chinese philosophy, her meticulous canvassing of key Warring States texts, and her insightful reconstruction of Early Chinese epistemology as based on perception rather than abstract concepts. Her weaknesses are the limited range of her representative texts and her occasional (...)
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29. Postmodern Conservatism: A Definition.Lawrence Cahoone - 2004 - Studies in Practical Philosophy 4 (1):23-53.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  30. Constraints and Possibilities the Evolution of Knowledge and Knowledge of Evolution.Mauro Ceruti & Alfonso Montuori - 1994
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  31. ZIMAN, J., "Reliable Knowledge: An Exploration of the Grounds for Belief in Science". [REVIEW]A. Chalmers - 1980 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 58:73.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32. Analytic Philosophy and Dialogic Conservatism.James Chase - 2010 - In James Williams (ed.), Postanalytic and Metacontinental: Crossing Philosophical Divides. Continuum. pp. 85.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33. The Role of Context in the Construction of Biotechnological Knowledge.Eloisa Cianci - 2012 - World Futures 68 (3):178 - 187.
    The aim of this article is to show how context, in its multiple forms, as well as having influence in localization, organization, government, and business of firms, is also fundamental on an epistemological level because it acts directly on the dynamics of scientific knowledge construction. It will be shown how context takes on the role of a constraint that strongly influences the growth of the endless possibilities from which a scientific knowledge emerges, and how epistemology has to rethink the definition (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34. The Structure of Empirical Knowledge.James Van Cleve & Laurence Bonjour - 1988 - Philosophical Review 97 (2):272.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  35. What Can She Know?: Feminist Theory and the Construction of Knowledge.Lorraine Code - 1991 - Cornell University Press.
    CHAPTER ONE Is the Sex of the Knower Epistemologically Significant? The Question A question that focuses on the knower, as the title of this chapter does, ...
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   99 citations  
  36. Reliability and Justification.Stewart Cohen - 1985 - The Monist 68:149-158.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37. Open-Minded or Empty—Headed? The Editor's Dilemma.A. Long Time Coming - 2012 - In Ingrid Fredriksson (ed.), Aspects of Consciousness: Essays on Physics, Death and the Mind. Mcfarland & Co..
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38. Foundational Versus Nonfoundational Theories of Empirical Justification.James W. Cornman - 1977 - American Philosophical Quarterly 14 (4):287 - 297.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  39. Review of "In Defence of Pure Reason" by Laurence BonJour. [REVIEW]Tim Crane - 2003 - Mind 112 (447):502-506.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40. Radical Constructivism and Theological Epistemology.John F. Crosby - 2010 - Essays in the Philosophy of Humanism 18 (1):1-16.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41. Reliabilism and Contemporary Epistemology.Zvonimir Čuljak - 2012 - Prolegomena 11 (2):259-282.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42. Can Reliabilism Explain How Conscious Reflection Justifies Beliefs?Susannah K. Devitt - unknown
    This research addresses the justificatory role of conscious reflection within a naturalized, reliabilist epistemology. Reliabilism is the view that implicit, mechanistic processes can justify beliefs, e.g. perceptual beliefs formed after a history of consistent exposure to normal lighting conditions are justified in a given context with normal lighting. A popular variant of reliabilism is virtue epistemology where the cognitive circumstances and abilities of an agent play a justificatory role, e.g. the cooperation of the prefrontal cortex and primary visual cortex of (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43. The Realism of Pragmatism.John Dewey - 1905 - Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods 2 (12):324-327.
    Dewy argues for the realist stance of his pragmatism as regards epistemology--as contrasted with moral idealism.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  44. Plantinga's Reliabilism Between Teleology and Epistemic Naturalization.Margherita Di Stasio - 2008 - European Journal of Analytic Philosophy 4 (1):13-24.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45. The Two Process Model of Cognition and Kierkegaard's Stages of Life.Jörg Disse - 2013 - E-Journal Philosophie der Psychologie 19 (2013):9 p..
    My aim is to relate Søren A. Kierkegaard’s early theory of stages as described basically in “Either-Or” to the theory of interest underlying the two process model of cognition of the Canadian psychologist Keith E. Stanovich with regard to the question of the highest formal goal we can pursue in our life. On the basis of Stanovich’s distinction between type 1 and type 2 processing and Kierkegaard’s distinction between an esthetical and an ethical stage of life, I argue for an (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46. The Forming of the Drakensberg.Alex L. du Toit - 1905 - Transactions of the South African Philosophical Society 16 (1):53-71.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47. History Vs. (Epistemological) Theory.Richard Eldridge - 2006 - History and Theory 45 (3):448–454.
    Interpretive Reasoning. By Laurent Stern.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48. Laurence BonJour, in Defense of Pure Reason.Mylan Engel Jr - 2000 - Dialogue 39:163-166.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49. The Epistemology of Keith Lehrer.Olsson Erik (ed.) - 2003 - Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50. The Contextual Basis of Rationality.William Douglas Evans - 1992 - Dissertation, The Johns Hopkins University
    Among recent naturalistic epistemologies, one class of theories, 'rough psychologistic' theories, is the most promising. These claim that for our belief-formation processes to yield knowledge is for them to be sufficiently reliable. The study of cognition, then, is best conducted by dividing labor between two groups: psychologists, who should describe what, and how reliable, the processes we use to form beliefs are; and philosophers, who should formulate normative standards of reliability. ;One promising version of rough psychologism is Alvin Goldman's nativistic (...)
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 4507