This category needs an editor. We encourage you to help if you are qualified.
Volunteer, or read more about what this involves.
Related categories

444 found
Order:
1 — 50 / 444
Material to categorize
  1. On Nonfoundationalistic Theories of Epistemic Justification.Timo Airaksinen - 1981 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 19 (4):403-412.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2. Contextualism, a New Theory Ofepistemic Justification?Timo Airksinen - 1982 - Philosophia 12 (1-2):37-50.
  3. On Foundationalism.George Allan - 2005 - Review of Metaphysics 59 (1):196-198.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4. Basic Knowledge and Jusificaton.Robert F. Almeder - 1983 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 13 (1):115 - 127.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  5. Epistemic Desiderata.William P. Alston - 1993 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 53 (3):527-551.
  6. Self-Warrant: A Neglected Form of Privileged Access.William P. Alston - 1976 - American Philosophical Quarterly 13 (4):257 - 272.
    This paper defends the view that a belief to the effect that the believer is currently in some conscious state is "self-Warranted," in the sense that what warrants it is simply its being a belief of that sort. This position is compared with other views as to the epistemic status of such beliefs--That they are warranted by their truth and that they are warranted by an immediate awareness of their object. In the course of the discussion, Various modes of immediate (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  7. TOPICS: 150. Foundations of Knowledge.Pedro Amaral - unknown
    Integration Area C. Nature, sources, and limits of human knowledge; roles of perception, reason, testimony, and intuition in acquiring rational beliefs; e.g. science, mathematics, values, the arts, religion, social issues, and psychological states. G.E. Integration IC.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8. The Social and Cultural Component of Epistemic Justification — a Reply.David B. Annis - 1982 - Philosophia 12 (1-2):51-55.
  9. Foundations of Knowledge.John P. Anton (ed.) - 1968 - State University of New York Press.
    “The inquiry into the foundations of knowledge is a systematic inquiry into the problem of truth. This problem constitutes one of the three main concerns of philosophical analysis, the others being the problem of beauty and the problem of goodness.” Thus Evangelos P. Papanoutsos, Greece’s leading contemporary philosopher, introduces this third book of his “Trilogy of the Mind.” The first two volumes covered aesthetics and ethics; this one is a major work in epistemology. Combining rigorous analysis with thorough-going scholarship, displaying (...)
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10. Can an Ultimate Foundation of Knowledge Be Non-Metaphysical?Karl-Otto Apel & Benjamin Gregg - 1993 - Journal of Speculative Philosophy 7 (3):171 - 190.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  11. Probability Without Certainty? Foundationalism and the Lewis.David Atkinson & Jeanne Peijnenburg - 2004 - Philosophy of Science 52:95-124.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12. The Causal Structure of Indirect Justification.Robert Audi - 1983 - Journal of Philosophy 80 (7):398-415.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   9 citations  
  13. Axiological Foundationalism.Robert Audi - 1982 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 12 (1):163 - 183.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  14. Immediate Inference Revised.Albert E. Avey - 1923 - Journal of Philosophy 20 (22):589-596.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15. Justification.Wayne Angus Backman - 1982 - Dissertation, University of Cincinnati
    This dissertation is an investigation into the nature of justification and rational belief. In Chapter I, four theories of the justification of belief are presented and criticized. These theories--classical foundationalism, modest foundationalism, coherentism, and the causal theory--are found to be similar in a certain respect. They each embody or are consistent with a certain conception of rationality, one in which beliefs are rational just in case they are backed by adequate justifications, and in which adequate justifications are thought to be (...)
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16. Epistemic Justification: Internalism Vs. Externalism, Foundations Vs. Virtues. [REVIEW]Marina Bakalova - 2006 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 6 (2):363-368.
  17. Resurrecting Old-Fashioned Foundationalism.Gordon Barnes - 2003 - Philosophical Books 44 (1):53-62.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18. Laurence BonJour, "the Structure of Empirical Knowledge". [REVIEW]William Barthelemy - 1990 - Dialogue 29 (2):311.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19. Foundationalism Strikes Back? In Search of Epistemically Basic.Nanay Bence - 2005 - In Rene van Woudenberg, Sabine Roeser & Ron Rood (eds.), Basic Belief and Basic Knowledge. Ontos-Verlag. pp. 41.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20. Epistemic Circularity and Common Sense: A Reply to Reed.Michael Bergmann - 2006 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 73 (1):198-207.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  21. Epistemic Circularity: Malignant and Benign.Michael Bergmann - 2004 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 69 (3):709–727.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   41 citations  
  22. Epistemic Justification: Internalism Vs. Externalism, Foundations Vs. Virtues. [REVIEW]Michael Bergmann - 2004 - Philosophical Review 113 (3):435-437.
  23. Anti_foundationalism.R. J. Bernstein - 2003 - In Gerard Delanty & Piet Strydom (eds.), Philosophies of Social Science: The Classic and Contemporary Readings. Open University.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24. Pt. 3. The Malleability of Human Nature. Reflections on Secular Foundationalism and Our Human Future / Stephen Erickson ; Nature as Second Nature : Plasticity and Habit / Peter Wake ; The Posthumanist Challenge to a Partly Naturalized Virtue Ethics. [REVIEW]Roberta M. Berry - 2009 - In Mark J. Cherry (ed.), The Normativity of the Natural: Human Goods, Human Virtues, and Human Flourishing. Springer.
  25. The Democracy We Need: Situation, Post-Foundationalism and Enlightenment.Nigel Blake - 1996 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 30 (2):215–238.
  26. The Truth of Immediate Knowledge.George Boas - 1926 - Journal of Philosophy 23 (1):5-10.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27. Foundationalism and the External World.Laurence BonJour - 1999 - Noûs 33 (s13):229-249.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  28. Haack on Justification and Experience.Laurence BonJour - 1997 - Synthese 112 (1):13-23.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   9 citations  
  29. Can Empirical Knowledge Have a Foundation?Laurence BonJour - 1978 - American Philosophical Quarterly 15 (1):1-14.
  30. Newman and Wittgenstein After Foundationalism.Angelo Bottone - 2005 - New Blackfriars 86 (1001):62-75.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31. Foundationalism for Moral Theory.Richard B. Brandt - 1995 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 25 (sup1):51-65.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32. Epistemic Priority and Coherence: Comments.Richard B. Brandt - 1964 - Journal of Philosophy 61 (19):557-559.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33. Exploring Certainty: Wittgenstein and Wide Fields of Thought.Robert Greenleaf Brice - 2014 - Lexington Books.
    Exploring Certainty: Wittgenstein and Wide Fields of Thought considers how, where, and to what extent the thoughts and ideas found in Wittgenstein’s On Certainty can be applied to other areas of thought, including: ethics, aesthetics, religious belief, mathematics, cognitive science, and political theory. Robert Greenleaf Brice opens new avenues of thought for scholars and students of the Wittgensteinian tradition, while introducing original philosophies about human knowledge and cognition.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34. The Antifoundationalism of Hermeneutic-Pragmatic Philosophy and the Foundationalism of Classical Philosophy.Andrzej Bronk - 1988 - Roczniki Filozoficzne 36 (1):182.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35. Non-Inferential Justification and Epistemic Circularity.Jessica Brown - 2004 - Analysis 64 (4):339–348.
    Bergmann argues that we should accept epistemically circular reasoning since, he claims, it is a consequence of the plausible assumption that some justification is noninferential (Bergmann, M. "Epistemic Circularity, Malignant and Benign", Philosophy and Phenomenological Research forthcoming). I show that epistemically circular reasoning does not follow merely from the assumption that some justification is noninferential, but only from that view combined with the assumption of basic justification or knowledge. Thus, we have reason to endorse epistemically circular reasoning only to the (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  36. Basic Knowledge.Allen Buchanan - 1976 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 37 (1):101-108.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37. Review of Albert Casullo, A Priori Justification[REVIEW]Panayot Butchvarov - 2003 - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2003 (8).
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38. Bootstrapping and Dogmatism.Timothy Butzer - 2017 - Philosophical Studies 174 (8):2083-2103.
    Dogmatists claim that having a perceptual experience as of p can provide one with immediate and defeasible warrant to believe that p. A persistent complaint against this position is that it sanctions an intuitively illicit form of reasoning: bootstrapping. I argue that dogmatism has no such commitments. Dogmatism is compatible with a principle that disallows the final non-deductive inference in the bootstrapping procedure. However, some authors have maintained that such strategy is doomed to failure because earlier stages of in the (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39. The Euclidean Theory of Knowledge.Gerald Cator - 1928 - Mind 37 (146):210-214.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40. The Status of Epistemic Principles.Roderick M. Chisholm - 1990 - Noûs 24 (2):209-216.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41. Coherence and Truth: BonJour's Metajustification.Terry J. Christlieb - 1986 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 24 (3):397-413.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42. Die Stellung der Theorie der Intersubjektivität im System der Husserlschen transzendentalen Phänomenologie.Arkadiusz Chrudzimski - 1999 - Conceptus: Zeitschrift Fur Philosophie 32 (80):99-138.
    Die Theorie der Intersubjektivität bildet einen der zentralen Punkte des Husserlschen Systems. Im Rahmen der konsequenten Epistemisierung des Wahrheitsbegriffs, die Husserl von Brentano übernommen hat, wird die objektive Realität mittels des Begriffs der intersubjektiven epistemischen Begründung definiert. Die Konstitution der intersubjektiven Gemeinschaft bildet demgemäß die unentbehrliche Vorbedingung für die Konstitution der intersubjektiven Welt. Wir zeigen, daß die Husserlsche Theorie nicht einwandfrei funktioniert. Es ist vor allem das Zusammenspiel des Begriffsempirismus mit dem epistemologischen Fundamentalismus, das das Scheitern seiner Version der Analogieschluß-Theorie (...)
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  43. The Theory of Justification.James Richard Ciccotelli - 1981 - Dissertation, Princeton University
    Analytic epistemologists, over the last two decades, have been troubled by two vexing and seemingly unrelated problems. First they have been trying to describe the "structure" of justification of our knowledge claims; this enterprise has been called the "foundationalism debate." Secondly though, they have also been trying to formulate precisely the necessary and sufficient conditions for "knowing;" this difficulty has come to be known as the "Gettier Problem." The first project deals with epistemic justification and the second, with the analysis (...)
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44. Is Epistemological Foundationalism Untenable?Predrag Cicovacki - 1993 - Diálogos. Revista de Filosofía de la Universidad de Puerto Rico 28 (61):139-148.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45. Tom Rockmore & Beth Singer , "Anti-Foundationalism Old and New".Ann K. Clark - 1994 - Metaphilosophy 25 (4):396.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46. Dissolving Some Dilemmas for Acquaintance Foundationalism.Cobb Ryan Daniel - unknown
    This essay purports to be a “negative” defense of acquaintance foundationalism. It is “negative” in that I do not do much in the way of advancing novel argument for the position, nor do I extend the position very much. Rather, I focus on demonstrating that the position has the resources to overcome objections that have been proposed to it. In particular, I argue that it can overcome the dilemma proposed by Wilfrid Sellars and developed by Laurence BonJour against foundationalism, as (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47. The Epistemological Foundations of Practical Reason.Mark Colby - 1999 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 42 (1):25 – 47.
    One consequence of the later Wittgenstein's influential critique of epistemological foundationalism has been to convince many contemporary philosophers that the ideal of universal and necessary cognitive grounds for moral or political norms is illusory. Recent neo-Wittgensteinian accounts of practical reason attempt to formulate a conception of a post-foundational politics in which a political ethos can be legitimate, rational or just even if its informing practices and cognitive standards lack foundational justification. Against these appropriations of Wittgenstein, I argue that his account (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48. Intellectual Assurance: Essays on Traditional Epistemic Internalism.Brett Coppenger & Michael Bergmann (eds.) - 2016 - Oxford University Press.
    Ordinarily, people take themselves to know a lot. I know where I was born, I know that I have two hands, I know that two plus two equals four, and I also think I know a lot of other stuff too. However, the project of trying to provide a philosophically satisfying account of knowledge, one that holds up against skeptical challenges, has proven surprisingly difficult. Either one aims for an account of justification (and knowledge) that is epistemologically demanding, in an (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49. Foundational Versus Nonfoundational Theories of Empirical Justification.James W. Cornman - 1977 - American Philosophical Quarterly 14 (4):287 - 297.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  50. Foundationalism and the Regress Argument.Andrew Cortens - 2002 - Disputatio 12:1 - 16.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 444