Related categories

115 found
Order:
1 — 50 / 115
  1. added 2019-09-09
    Cuatro Tipos de Intención: Actual, Habitual, Virtual E Interpretativa.Sydney Penner - 2018 - Pensamiento 74 (279):91-122.
    Suárez distingue entre cuatro formas diferentes de intentar un fin de acción: con una intención actual, virtual, habitual o interpretativa. Esta distinción se repite en muchos libros y artículos en siglos posteriores como una parte estándar de la teoría de la acción, y Suárez es evidentemente la fuente de muchos de los autores posteriores. Este artículo examina el tratamiento de Suárez de la distinción. La intención interpretativa recibe la mayor atención, ya que Suárez parece dar varias caracterizaciones inconsistentes de ella (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  2. added 2019-07-11
    Francisco Suárez on Beings of Reason and Non-Strict Ontological Pluralism.Brian Embry - 2019 - Philosophers' Imprint 19 (27).
    For Francisco Suárez, beings of reason are non-existent objects that we can think about, objects like goat-stags and round squares. The first section of the fifty-fourth of Suárez’s Metaphysical Disputations is about the ontological status of beings of reason. Suárez’s view has been the subject of disagreement in the literature because he sometimes says that there are beings of reason, and he sometimes says there are not. In this paper, I argue for and explain an ontological pluralist reading of Suárez. (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  3. added 2019-06-11
    Suárez’s Influence on Descartes’s Theory of Eternal Truths.Amy Karofsky - 2001 - Journal of Nietzsche Studies 10 (2):241-262.
  4. added 2019-06-06
    Suárez on Beings of Reason: What Kind of Beings Are Beings of Reason, and What Kind of Being Do They Have?Bernardo J. Canteñs - 2003 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 77 (2):171-187.
    Beings of reason or non-existent objects have always been a source of mind-boggling paradoxes that have vexed philosophers and thinkers in the past and present. Consider Bertrand Russell’s paradox: “if A and B are not different, then the difference between A and B does not subsist. But how can a non-entity be the subject of a proposition?” Or Meinong’s paradox: “There are objects of which it is true that there are no such objects.” At the root of these troubling conundrums (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  5. added 2019-06-05
    Suárez on Creation and Intrinsic Change.Jacob Tuttle - 2019 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 93 (1):29-51.
    The late scholastic philosopher Francisco Suárez articulates and defends an extraordinarily detailed account of efficient causation. Some of the most interesting and difficult questions connected with this account concern the particular types of efficient causation he acknowledges. This paper clarifies one of the most fundamental distinctions Suárez employs in the course of his treatment of efficient causation—namely, that between motion or change, on the one hand, and creation ex nihilo, on the other. The paper shows that, although motion and creation (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  6. added 2019-03-12
    Suárez y el destino de la metafísica. De Avicena a Heidegger.Leopoldo José Prieto López - 2013 - Madrid: Biblioteca de Autores Cristianos.
    El interés por la obra filosófica del P. Francisco Suárez, de la Compañía de Jesús, está hoy más vivo que nunca. No se limita únicamente a los estudiosos españoles, sino que se extiende a otros países (como EE.UU., Francia, Alemania, Italia, etc.) donde los estudios sobre la filosofía de Suárez han adquirido una notoria relevancia. Motivo de este interés es la creciente conciencia de la modernidad de su filosofía, certificada por la recepción de no pocas de sus ideas en el (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  7. added 2018-09-21
    Zum Historischen Hintergrund Der Transzendentalienlehre In Den Disputationes Metaphysicae.Rolf Darge - 2014 - In Lukás Novák (ed.), Suárez's Metaphysics in its Historical and Systematic Context. De Gruyter. pp. 39-62.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  8. added 2018-09-21
    Suárez’ Disputationes metaphysicae und die mittelalterlichen Transzendentalienlehren.Rolf Darge - 2010 - Archiwum Historii Filozofii I Myśli Społecznej 55.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  9. added 2018-09-21
    Suárez'Theorie der ontischen Wahrheit und die Metaphysiktradition.'.Rolf Darge - 2004 - Theologie Und Philosophie 79 (1):31-54.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  10. added 2018-09-21
    Suárez' Transzendentale Seinsauslegung Und Die Metaphysiktradition.Rolf Darge - 2003 - Brill.
    This study shows in detail how Suarez' metaphysics synthesize in an original way elements from different traditions of the doctrine of the transcendentals (being, unity, truth, goodness) and thus develops a new fascinating view of a ...
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  11. added 2018-09-21
    Grundthese und ontologische Bedeutung der Lehre von der Analogie des Seienden nach F. Suarez.Rolf Darge - 1999 - Philosophisches Jahrbuch 106 (2):312-333.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  12. added 2018-09-21
    Suárez on the Analogy of Being: Some Historical Background. E. Ashworth - 1995 - Vivarium 33 (1):50-75.
  13. added 2018-08-07
    Geschichte der Mittelalterlichen Philosophie Im Christlichen Abendland.Franz Brentano - 1980 - Felix Meiner.
    H. 46 und H 47: >Geschichte der Philosophie mit älteren, von Brentano ausgeschiedenen Blättern. ... Vorlesung über >Geschichte der mittelalterlichen Philosophie im christlichen Abendland< nicht mehr angekündigt worden. ' Die von F.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  14. added 2018-05-25
    Review of Suárez on Aristotelian Causality, Investigating Medieval Philosophy, Vol. 9. [REVIEW]Jacob Tuttle - 2018 - Speculum 93 (2):498-499.
  15. added 2018-05-07
    Prolegomena to a Study of Beings of Reason in Post-Suarezian Scholasticism, 1600–1650: A Journal of Analytic Scholasticism.Daniel Dominik Novotný - 2006 - Studia Neoaristotelica 3 (2):117-141.
    In 1597 Francisco Suárez published a comprehensive treatise on beings of reason as part of his Disputationes metaphysicae. Subsequent scholastic philosophers vigorously debated various aspects of Suárez’s theory. The aim of this paper is to identify some of the most controversial points of these debates, as they developed in the first half of the seventeenth century. In particular, I focus on the intension and the extension of ‘ens rationis’, its division and its causes. Additionally, I will discuss how Suárez’s views (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  16. added 2018-01-15
    Suárez y la Premoción Física.David Torrijos-Castrillejo - 2017 - Cuadernos Salmantinos de Filosofía 44:71-94.
    This article intends to examine the problematic question of the ontological status of “physical premotion,” that is, the divine motion of created free will. This idea was developed by the Dominican Báñez and was strongly criticised by the Jesuit Suárez. Suárez’s description of physical premotion shows that he gradually conditioned the debate in a way which compelled to see the premotion as an entity different from the creator and the free agent. Several texts of Suárez are also reviewed in discussion (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  17. added 2018-01-15
    The Notitia Intuitiva and Notitia Abstractiva of the External Senses in Second Scholasticism: Suárez, Poinsot and Francisco de Oviedo.Daniel Heider - 2016 - Vivarium 54 (2-3):173-203.
    This paper analyzes the theories of three representatives of Second Scholasticism, namely Francisco Suárez, sj, John Poinsot, op, and Francisco de Oviedo, sj, on the issue of the intuitive and abstractive cognition of the external senses. Based on a comparison of their theories, linked to the historical starting point of the debate in the first decades of the fourteenth century, the paper argues that the doctrinal and argumentative matrix of these authors’ texts is significantly ‘present’ in the Second Scholastics as (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  18. added 2018-01-15
    Suarez's Theory of Knowledge and its Relation to Thomism.Daniel Heider - 2011 - Filosoficky Casopis 59 (6):865-896.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  19. added 2018-01-15
    K objektivnímu bytí u Suáreze. Poznámka ke studii Jana Palkosky „Descartova ontologie mentální reprezentace a otázka Suárezova vlivu“.Daniel Heider - 2011 - Studia Neoaristotelica 8 (1):95-105.
  20. added 2018-01-15
    Suárez on Material Substance: Reification of Intrinsic Principles and the Unity of Material Composites.'.Daniel Heider - 2008 - Organon F: Medzinárodný Časopis Pre Analytickú Filozofiu 15 (4):423-38.
    In this paper I present Suárez’s conception on material substance in connection with two main aspects of his theory. The first aspect is “reification” of the intrinsic principles of a composite, which has led some interpreters to the claim that Suárez significantly prepared the way for the accession of Cartesian anthropological dualism. The second one is Suárez’s emphasis on the substantial unity of material composites. The analysis of the second aspect is conceived as a counterbalance to some uncharitable interpretations of (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  21. added 2018-01-15
    Leibnizova Disputatio Metaphysica De Principio Individui A F. Suárez.Daniel Heider - 2004 - Studia Neoaristotelica 1 (1/2):101-123.
    Leibnizii Disputatio de Principio Individui et F. SuarezIn hac dissertatione primitiae laborum philosophicorum Leibnizii, scil. Disputatio metaphysica de Principio Individui, examinantur et quidem itam ut Leibniziisententia cum doctina Suarezii in Disputationibus Metaphysicis proposita comparetur. Lebnizii et Doctoris Eximii de hoc principio opiniones in multis concordant: Uterque enim auctor quaestionem de individuatione pure ontologice pertractat, uterque idem principium individuationis materialibus et immaterialibus tribuit, uterque nominalismo quodammodo favet. Hoc ex conclusionibus, quas defendunt, elucet, et modo, quo sententias adversarias(Scotisticam praesertim) impugnant, confirmatur. Affinitas (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  22. added 2017-12-04
    Ens Rationis From Suárez to Caramuel: A Study in Scholasticism of the Baroque Era.Daniel Novotny - 2013 - Fordham University Press.
    In this groundbreaking book, Daniel D. Novotny explores one of the most controversial topics of Suarez's philosophy: "beings of reason." Beings of reason are impossible intentional objects, such as blindness and square-circle.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  23. added 2017-12-04
    F. Suarez: His Theory of Beings of Reason and Its Reception.Daniel D. Novotny - 2011 - Filozofia 66 (1):35-48.
    The problem of non-being and intentionality has been among the topic subjects of Western philosophers from Parmenides to Quine. In medieval and post-medieval scholastics the issue was articulated mainly as ens rationis . The paper deals with the character and division of beings of reason in Francisco Suarez . An immanent critique of Suarez’s theory is given as well. The paper offers also a brief outline of the history of its later reception by Baroque authors.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  24. added 2017-12-04
    Is There a Philosophy in the Work of Francisco Suarez? The Case of the Doctrine'verbum Mentis'in'auctoritates'and Arguments of Reason.Marco Forlivesi - 2008 - Rinascimento 48:397-450.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  25. added 2017-12-04
    Suarez on Beings of Reason and Truth (2).John P. Doyle - 1988 - Vivarium 26 (1):51-72.
  26. added 2017-12-04
    Suarez on Beings of Reason and Truth (1).John P. Doyle - 1987 - Vivarium 25 (1):47-75.
  27. added 2017-10-30
    Comments on Roger Ariew's “Descartes and Leibniz as Readers of Suarez”.Jeffrey K. McDonough - manuscript
    Comments on Roger Ariew’s “Descartes and Leibniz as Readers of Suarez," presented at Franscico Suarez, S.J.: Last Medieval or First Early Modern?, London, Ontario, University of Western Ontario, September 2008.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  28. added 2017-10-30
    Suárez, cuerpo y escolástica: una antropología de la semejanza.Antonio Rivera García - 2016 - Ingenium. Revista Electrónica de Pensamiento Moderno y Metodología En Historia de la Ideas 10:143-159.
    Firstly, this paper tackles the way in which – within the Christian context – the body qua body, as the sole locus of existence, only arises when the disparity between the mortal creature and the immortal God is highlighted, that is to say, when man is regarded as a sort of vestigium Dei instead of an imago Dei. Throughout early modernity, only theologians and philosophers who, like Servet or Da Costa, posit the mortality of the soul are capable of presenting (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  29. added 2017-10-30
    Universals in Second Scholasticism: A Comparative Study with Focus on the Theories of Francisco Suárez S. J. , João Poinsot O. P. And Bartolomeo Mastri da Meldola O. F. M. Conv. /Bonaventura Belluto O. F. M. Conv. By Daniel Heider. [REVIEW]Caterina Tarlazzi - 2016 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 54 (1):165-166.
    The debate on universals is, generally speaking, a well-known subject in the history of philosophy, but views on universals from the end of the sixteenth to the mid-seventeenth century—the object of Heider’s welcome contribution—are quite neglected. Such views are extremely sophisticated, drawing on the established traditions of Thomism and Scotism, in particular, but bringing them to a new level of technicality. Heider investigates three major positions: those of Francisco Suárez, João Poinsot, and the joint position of Bartolomeo Mastri and Bonaventura (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  30. added 2017-10-30
    Suárez’s “Best Argument” and the Dependence of Morality on God.Mark C. Murphy - 2014 - Quaestiones Disputatae 5 (1):30-42.
    I want to begin by expressing misgivings about a standard way of making out a claim for the dependence of morality on God, misgivings that I do not have about a somewhat less standard way of arguing for this dependence. I will then consider a guiding maxim for how to proceed along this less standard way, a maxim that I draw from Suárez’s account of the relationship between divine activity and the activity of secondary causes. I then sketch one way (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  31. added 2017-10-30
    Suárez's Nominalist Master Argument: Metaphysical Disputations 5, 1.Jorge Secada - 2014 - In Lukás Novák (ed.), Suárez's Metaphysics in its Historical and Systematic Context. De Gruyter. pp. 211-236.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  32. added 2017-10-30
    The Connexions Between Vital Acts in Suárez's Psychology.Simo Knuuttila - 2014 - In Lukás Novák (ed.), Suárez's Metaphysics in its Historical and Systematic Context. De Gruyter. pp. 259-274.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  33. added 2017-10-30
    Suárez in Relation to Anselm, Aquinas and Scotus on Proving God's Existence.Robert Fastiggi - 2014 - In Lukás Novák (ed.), Suárez's Metaphysics in its Historical and Systematic Context. De Gruyter. pp. 309-324.
  34. added 2017-10-30
    The Historical Non-Significance of Suárez's Theory of Beings of Reason: A Lesson From Hurtado.Daniel D. Novotný - 2014 - In Lukás Novák (ed.), Suárez's Metaphysics in its Historical and Systematic Context. De Gruyter. pp. 183-208.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  35. added 2017-10-30
    In Search of The Roots of Suárez's Conception of Metaphysics: Aquinas, Bonino, Hervaeus Natalis, Orbellis, Trombetta.Marco Forlivesi - 2014 - In Lukás Novák (ed.), Suárez's Metaphysics in its Historical and Systematic Context. De Gruyter. pp. 13-38.
  36. added 2017-10-30
    The Hidden Influence of Suárez on Kant's Transcendental Conception of ‘Being’, ‘Essence’ and ‘Existence’.Costantino Esposito - 2014 - In Lukás Novák (ed.), Suárez's Metaphysics in its Historical and Systematic Context. De Gruyter. pp. 117-134.
  37. added 2017-10-30
    Quasi-Absolute Time in Francisco Suárez's Metaphysical Disputations.Emmaline Bexley - 2012 - Intellectual History Review 22 (1):5-22.
    Suárez's discussion of time in the Metaphysical Disputations is one of the earliest long treatises on time (extending over sixty pages), and includes detailed arguments supporting the view that physical actions take place within an absolute temporal reference frame. Whereas some previous thinkers, such as John Duns Scotus and Peter Aureole, had made tantalising suggestions that time exists independently of physical changes, their ideas were primarily negative theses in response to perceived problems with the dominant view that time was caused (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  38. added 2017-10-30
    Doyle, John P. Collected Studies on Francisco Suárez, S.J. (1548-1617).Marco Sgarbi - 2012 - Review of Metaphysics 65 (4):866-868.
  39. added 2017-10-30
    Unity in the Multiplicity of Suárez's Soul.Marleen Rozemond - 2012 - In Benjamin Hill & Henrik Lagerlund (eds.), The Philosophy of Francisco Suárez. Oxford University Press.
    Suárez held that the vital faculties of the soul are really distinct from the soul itself and each other and that they cannot causally interact. This means that he needed to account for the connections between the activities of the faculties: they both interfere with and contribute to each other’s activities. Suárez does so by giving the soul a direct causal role in these activities. This role requires the unity of the soul of a living being and Suárez used it (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  40. added 2017-10-30
    Suárez's Last Stand for the Substantial Form.Helen Hattab - 2012 - In Benjamin Hill & Henrik Lagerlund (eds.), The Philosophy of Francisco Suárez. Oxford University Press.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  41. added 2017-10-30
    Suárez's Ideas on Natural Law in the Light of His Philosophical Anthropology and Moral Psychology.Erik Åkerlund - 2010 - In Virpi Mäkinen (ed.), The Nature of Rights: Moral and Political Aspects of Rights in Late Medieval and Early Modern Philosophy. The Philosophical Society of Finland.
  42. added 2017-10-30
    The Nature of Suárez’s Metaphysics. Disputationes Metaphysicae and Their Main Systematic Strains.Daniel Heider - 2009 - Studia Neoaristotelica 6 (1):99-110.
    The paper presents seven basic features of Francisco Suárez’s metaphysics. They are as follows: “Univocalization” of the concept of being and transcendental properties, “reification” of the act-potency doctrine, “ontologization” of individuality, “conceptualization” of the Scotist perspective, “existential” character of the concept of being, “epistemologization” and “methodologization” of metaphysics. Whereas the first five are indicated as remaining in the preserve of the traditional scholastic philosophy, the last two are taken as portending the methodological priority of the subjective states of affairs of (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  43. added 2017-10-30
    Suarez's Critique of the Thomist Principle of Individuation.D. Heider - 2004 - Filosoficky Casopis 52 (4):591-607.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  44. added 2017-10-30
    "On Formal and Universal Unity," by Francis Suarez, S.J., Trans., with Introd. By J. F. Ross.George P. Klubertanz - 1966 - Modern Schoolman 43 (3):319-320.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  45. added 2017-10-30
    Suârez's Approach to Substantial Form.David M. Knight - 1962 - Modern Schoolman 39 (3):219-239.
  46. added 2017-10-03
    Suárez's Non-Reductive Theory of Efficient Causation.Jacob Tuttle - 2016 - Oxford Studies in Medieval Philosophy 4:125-158.
  47. added 2017-09-05
    Francisco Suárez über den Suizid.Brieskorn Norbert - 2017 - In Franz-Josef Bormann (ed.), Lebensbeendende Handlungen: Ethik, Medizin Und Recht Zur Grenze von ‚Töten‘ Und ‚Sterbenlassen‘. De Gruyter. pp. 123-134.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  48. added 2017-08-08
    Metaphysics. Shadows of Being: Francisco Suarez's 'Entia Rationis'.Christopher Shields - 2012 - In Benjamin Hill & Henrik Lagerlund (eds.), The Philosophy of Francisco Suárez. Oxford University Press.
  49. added 2017-07-19
    Finality Without Final Causes? – Suárez’s Account of Natural Teleology.Stephan Schmid - 2015 - Ergo: An Open Access Journal of Philosophy 2.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  50. added 2017-07-19
    Suárez and the Problem of Final Causation.Stephan Schmid - 2014 - In Lukás Novák (ed.), Suárez's Metaphysics in its Historical and Systematic Context. De Gruyter. pp. 293-308.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
1 — 50 / 115