Related categories

131 found
Order:
1 — 50 / 131
  1. Francisco Suárez, Metaphysical Disputation I: On the Nature of First Philosophy or Metaphysics.Shane Duarte - forthcoming - Washington, D.C.: Catholic University of America Press.
    A translation of the First Disputation from Francisco Suárez's Disputationes Metaphysicae.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  2. Can We Know Substances? Suárez on a Sceptical Puzzle.Dominik Perler - forthcoming - Theoria.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  3. Suárez's Metaphysics of Active Powers.Jacob Tuttle - forthcoming - Review of Metaphysics.
    In the last several years, there has been an uptick of scholarly interest in Aristotelian theories of efficient causation. Much of this interest has focused on the late scholastic figure Francisco Suárez (1548-1617). This paper clarifies an important but neglected aspect of Suárez's theory of efficient causation—namely, his account of active causal powers. Like other Aristotelians, Suárez understands active causal powers as features that enable their subjects to perform certain sorts of actions. For example, a fire is able to heat (...)
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  4. Predestinación y libertad. Escritos en torno a la controversia de auxiliis.Domingo Báñez & David Torrijos-Castrillejo - 2021 - Pamplona: EUNSA.
    Edition of the opuscules by D. Báñez on De auxiliis controversy. There is the critical edition of three manuscripts and the first Spanish annotated translation of the opuscules. The Latin text is disposed together with the translation. An introduction situates the opuscules in its systematic and historical context.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  5. ¿Qué fue la “segunda” escuela de Salamanca? A propósito de su deriva metafísica y la disputa de auxiliis.David Torrijos Castrillejo - 2021 - In Simona Langella & Rafael Ramis Barceló (eds.), ¿Qué es la escuela de Salamanca? Sindéresis. pp. 357-392.
    This article exposes the concept of "second" Salamanca's School, i.e. the followers of Vitoria in a second generation that teach in Salamanca during the last years of the sixteenth century and the first years of the seventeenth. The author shows that there is an important continuity among the first and the second School and revisits the aspects which have been seen as negative for the School: the developing of metaphysics and the De Auxiliis controversy. The metaphysics as such cannot be (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  6. La moción divina ante la contingencia y la libertad de las creaturas según santo Tomás y Domingo Báñez.Torrijos-Castrillejo David - 2020 - Scripta Fulgentina 30:39-64.
    Against an interpretation of Saint Thomas Aquinas’s thought that understands the divine motion of the created will only providing a generic impulse to it, in this article is defended that God moves specifically for every good choice. This motion doesn’t prevent at all the contingency of creatures and neither freedom of choice. Is also shown how Báñez’s thought is quite faithful to Saint Thomas in this and doesn’t intend anything else but simply to make it known and defend it from (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  7. Baroque Metaphysics. Studies on Francisco Suárez.Simone Guidi - 2020 - Coimbra, Portugal: Palimage.
    This book collects six unpublished and published academic studies on the thought of Francisco Suárez, which is addressed through accurate textual analyses and meticulous contextualization of his doctrines in the Scholastic debate. The present essays aim to portray two complementary aspects coexisting in the work of the Uncommon Doctor: his innovative approach and his adherence to the tradition. To this scope, they focus on some pivotal, but often neglected, topics in Suárez’s metaphysics and psychology – such as his theories of (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  8. Making Use of the Testimonies: Suárez and Grotius on Natural Law.Sydney Penner - 2020 - Grotiana 41 (1):108-136.
    Thanks to Barbeyrac, Pufendorf and others, there is a long-familiar picture of Grotius as offering a groundbreaking account of natural law. By now there is also a familiar observation that there is no agreement what makes Grotius’s account innovative. Sometimes this leads to skepticism about how innovative Grotius’s account of natural law really is. Some scholars suggest that Grotius’s account of natural law resembles Suárez’s account. But others continue to argue that Barbeyrac is right to see Grotius as breaking the (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  9. Suárez on Intellectual Cognition and Occasional Causation.Dominik Perler - 2020 - In Dominik Perler & Sebastian Bender (eds.), Causation and Cognition in Early Modern Philosophy. New York: Routledge. pp. 18-38.
    Like many philosophers in the scholastic tradition, Suárez claims that we cannot cognize anything unless we use a cognitive device, a so-called intelligible species. But how can we produce such a device? And what kind of cognition does it make possible? This chapter examines these questions, paying particular attention to Suárez’s rejection of traditional theories that explained the production of intelligible species by referring to efficient causation. On his view, there can only be a relation of occasional causation: the existence (...)
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  10. Suárez on the Unity of Material Substances.Dominik Perler - 2020 - Vivarium 58 (3):143-167.
    Many late medieval Aristotelians assumed that a natural substance has several substantial forms in addition to matter as really distinct parts. This assumption gave rise to a unity problem: why is a substance more than a conglomeration of all these parts? This paper discusses Francisco Suárez’s answer. It first shows that he rejected the idea that there is a plurality of forms, emphasizing instead that each substance has a single form and hence a single structuring principle. It then examines his (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  11. La relación intencional de Brentano a la luz del pensamiento de Suárez.David Torrijos-Castrillejo - 2020 - Anuario Filosófico 53:419-446.
    Brentano’s introduction of the concept of intentionality into contemporary philosophy was indebted to scholastic sources. Among these, Suárez has not been sufficiently addressed, even though his idea of transcendental relation is relied upon by Brentano to describe the intentional relation. In addition, in his examination of being as truth in Suárez, Brentano manifests his assumption of the principle of immanence. Finally, this article argues that, even in his reist period, Brentano continued to understand knowledge as a relation.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  12. Was Báñez a Bañecian?David Torrijos-Castrillejo - 2020 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 94 (3):431-458.
    This article deals with the historical position of Domingo Báñez in the De Auxiliis Controversy. He was a protagonist of the beginning of the dispute and his name was used by the defenders of Luis de Molina to describe the traditional Thomist account on divine providence and free will; even today, many Thomists use the name of Báñez to designate their own position. This article tries to determine his personal opinion regarding the ontology of physical premotion without presupposing the later (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  13. Francisco Suárez’s Conception of the Social Contract.André Santos Campos - 2019 - Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 75 (2):1195-1218.
    This paper engages with Suárez’s writings on the origins of political power in order to ascertain whether he can be considered a social contract theorist at all. It focuses on specific details of his consent theory, namely the ‘who’, the ‘what’, the ‘how’ and the ‘what for’ of the agreements that originate government. The conclusion shows that even though his systematic treatment of contracts falls short of becoming a social contract theory in the same way as modern contractualist thinkers, he (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  14. Francisco Suárez on Beings of Reason and Non-Strict Ontological Pluralism.Brian Embry - 2019 - Philosophers' Imprint 19.
    For Francisco Suárez, beings of reason are non-existent objects that we can think about, objects like goat-stags and round squares. The first section of the fifty-fourth of Suárez’s Metaphysical Disputations is about the ontological status of beings of reason. Suárez’s view has been the subject of disagreement in the literature because he sometimes says that there are beings of reason, and he sometimes says there are not. In this paper, I argue for and explain an ontological pluralist reading of Suárez. (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  15. Suárez on Creation and Intrinsic Change.Jacob Tuttle - 2019 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 93 (1):29-51.
    The late scholastic philosopher Francisco Suárez articulates and defends an extraordinarily detailed account of efficient causation. Some of the most interesting and difficult questions connected with this account concern the particular types of efficient causation he acknowledges. This paper clarifies one of the most fundamental distinctions Suárez employs in the course of his treatment of efficient causation—namely, that between motion or change, on the one hand, and creation ex nihilo, on the other. The paper shows that, although motion and creation (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  16. Cuatro Tipos de Intención: Actual, Habitual, Virtual E Interpretativa.Sydney Penner - 2018 - Pensamiento 74 (279):91-122.
    Suárez distingue entre cuatro formas diferentes de intentar un fin de acción: con una intención actual, virtual, habitual o interpretativa. Esta distinción se repite en muchos libros y artículos en siglos posteriores como una parte estándar de la teoría de la acción, y Suárez es evidentemente la fuente de muchos de los autores posteriores. Este artículo examina el tratamiento de Suárez de la distinción. La intención interpretativa recibe la mayor atención, ya que Suárez parece dar varias caracterizaciones inconsistentes de ella (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  17. Francisco Suárez acerca do consentimento e da obrigação política.Daniel Schwartz - 2018 - Veritas – Revista de Filosofia da Pucrs 63 (1):376.
    Os intérpretes discordam quanto a origem que Francisco Suárez atribui a obrigação e a sujeição política. De acordo com alguns, Suárez, como outros contratualistas, acredita que é o consentimento dos indivíduos que causa a obrigação política; outros, porém, afirmam que para Suárez a obrigação política não deriva do consentimento dos indivíduos. Em respaldo a esta tese eles invocam a opinião de Suárez de que o poder político emana da cidade por meio de “decorrência natural.” Eu argumento que a análise de (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  18. Praeceptum iustum ac stabile, sufficienter promulgatum. Dogmatica giuridica e suggestioni teologiche nel «sistema delle fonti» di Francisco Suárez.Franco Todescan - 2018 - Quaestio 18:487-506.
    This essay is drawn up to represent Francisco Suárez's system of laws. The civil law is mainly founded on the legislator's will, but this law must also be fair. The law of nations is divided into a...
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  19. Review of Suárez on Aristotelian Causality, Investigating Medieval Philosophy, Vol. 9. [REVIEW]Jacob Tuttle - 2018 - Speculum 93 (2):498-499.
  20. Francisco Suárez on Eternal Truths, Eternal Essences, and Extrinsic Being.Brian Embry - 2017 - Ergo: An Open Access Journal of Philosophy 4.
    It is necessarily true that water is H2O, but it is a contingent fact that there is any water at all. Water therefore seems ill suited to ground the necessary truth that water is H2O. One view traditionally attributed to Scotus and Henry of Ghent was that while water is contingent, the essence of water is necessary; hence, the essence of water can ground the so-called eternal truth that water is H2O. Francisco Suárez rejects this view on the grounds that (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  21. Francisco Suárez über den Suizid.Brieskorn Norbert - 2017 - In Franz-Josef Bormann (ed.), Lebensbeendende Handlungen: Ethik, Medizin Und Recht Zur Grenze von ‚Töten‘ Und ‚Sterbenlassen‘. De Gruyter. pp. 123-134.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  22. Suárez y la premoción física.David Torrijos Castrillejo - 2017 - Cuadernos Salmantinos de Filosofía 44:71-94.
    This article intends to examine the problematic question of the ontological status of “physical premotion,” that is, the divine motion of created free will. This idea was developed by the Dominican Báñez and was strongly criticised by the Jesuit Suárez. Suárez’s description of physical premotion shows that he gradually conditioned the debate in a way which compelled to see the premotion as an entity different from the creator and the free agent. Several texts of Suárez are also reviewed in discussion (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  23. Suárez, cuerpo y escolástica: una antropología de la semejanza.Antonio Rivera García - 2016 - Ingenium. Revista Electrónica de Pensamiento Moderno y Metodología En Historia de la Ideas 10:143-159.
    Firstly, this paper tackles the way in which – within the Christian context – the body qua body, as the sole locus of existence, only arises when the disparity between the mortal creature and the immortal God is highlighted, that is to say, when man is regarded as a sort of vestigium Dei instead of an imago Dei. Throughout early modernity, only theologians and philosophers who, like Servet or Da Costa, posit the mortality of the soul are capable of presenting (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  24. The Notitia Intuitiva and Notitia Abstractiva of the External Senses in Second Scholasticism: Suárez, Poinsot and Francisco de Oviedo.Daniel Heider - 2016 - Vivarium 54 (2-3):173-203.
    This paper analyzes the theories of three representatives of Second Scholasticism, namely Francisco Suárez, sj, John Poinsot, op, and Francisco de Oviedo, sj, on the issue of the intuitive and abstractive cognition of the external senses. Based on a comparison of their theories, linked to the historical starting point of the debate in the first decades of the fourteenth century, the paper argues that the doctrinal and argumentative matrix of these authors’ texts is significantly ‘present’ in the Second Scholastics as (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  25. Universals in Second Scholasticism: A Comparative Study with Focus on the Theories of Francisco Suárez S. J. , João Poinsot O. P. And Bartolomeo Mastri da Meldola O. F. M. Conv. /Bonaventura Belluto O. F. M. Conv. By Daniel Heider. [REVIEW]Caterina Tarlazzi - 2016 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 54 (1):165-166.
    The debate on universals is, generally speaking, a well-known subject in the history of philosophy, but views on universals from the end of the sixteenth to the mid-seventeenth century—the object of Heider’s welcome contribution—are quite neglected. Such views are extremely sophisticated, drawing on the established traditions of Thomism and Scotism, in particular, but bringing them to a new level of technicality. Heider investigates three major positions: those of Francisco Suárez, João Poinsot, and the joint position of Bartolomeo Mastri and Bonaventura (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  26. Suárez's Non-Reductive Theory of Efficient Causation.Jacob Tuttle - 2016 - Oxford Studies in Medieval Philosophy 4 (1):125-158.
    This paper examines an important but neglected topic in Suárez’s metaphysics–—namely, his theory of efficient causation. According to Suárez, efficient causation is to be identified with action, one of Aristotle’s ten highest genera or categories. The paper shows how Suárez’s identification of efficient causation with action helps to shed light on his views about the precise nature of efficient causation, and its role in his ontology. More specifically, it shows that Suárez understands efficient causation to be a distinctive or sui (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  27. Suárez, Francisco.Sydney Penner - 2015 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
    Francisco Suárez Sometimes called the "Eminent Doctor" after Paul V’s designation of him as doctor eximius et pius, Francisco Suárez was the leading theological and philosophical light of Spain’s Golden Age, alongside such cultural icons as Miguel de Cervantes, Tomás Luis de Victoria, and El Greco. Although initially rejected on grounds of deficient health … Continue reading Suárez, Francisco →.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  28. Finality Without Final Causes? – Suárez’s Account of Natural Teleology.Stephan Schmid - 2015 - Ergo: An Open Access Journal of Philosophy 2.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  29. Zum Historischen Hintergrund Der Transzendentalienlehre In Den Disputationes Metaphysicae.Rolf Darge - 2014 - In Lukás Novák (ed.), Suárez's Metaphysics in its Historical and Systematic Context. De Gruyter. pp. 39-62.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  30. The Hidden Influence of Suárez on Kant's Transcendental Conception of ‘Being’, ‘Essence’ and ‘Existence’.Costantino Esposito - 2014 - In Lukás Novák (ed.), Suárez's Metaphysics in its Historical and Systematic Context. De Gruyter. pp. 117-134.
  31. Suárez in Relation to Anselm, Aquinas and Scotus on Proving God's Existence.Robert Fastiggi - 2014 - In Lukás Novák (ed.), Suárez's Metaphysics in its Historical and Systematic Context. De Gruyter. pp. 309-324.
  32. In Search of The Roots of Suárez's Conception of Metaphysics: Aquinas, Bonino, Hervaeus Natalis, Orbellis, Trombetta.Marco Forlivesi - 2014 - In Lukás Novák (ed.), Suárez's Metaphysics in its Historical and Systematic Context. De Gruyter. pp. 13-38.
  33. The Connexions Between Vital Acts in Suárez's Psychology.Simo Knuuttila - 2014 - In Lukás Novák (ed.), Suárez's Metaphysics in its Historical and Systematic Context. De Gruyter. pp. 259-274.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  34. Suárez’s “Best Argument” and the Dependence of Morality on God.Mark C. Murphy - 2014 - Quaestiones Disputatae 5 (1):30-42.
    I want to begin by expressing misgivings about a standard way of making out a claim for the dependence of morality on God, misgivings that I do not have about a somewhat less standard way of arguing for this dependence. I will then consider a guiding maxim for how to proceed along this less standard way, a maxim that I draw from Suárez’s account of the relationship between divine activity and the activity of secondary causes. I then sketch one way (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  35. The Historical Non-Significance of Suárez's Theory of Beings of Reason: A Lesson From Hurtado.Daniel D. Novotný - 2014 - In Lukás Novák (ed.), Suárez's Metaphysics in its Historical and Systematic Context. De Gruyter. pp. 183-208.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  36. Suárez and the Problem of Final Causation.Stephan Schmid - 2014 - In Lukás Novák (ed.), Suárez's Metaphysics in its Historical and Systematic Context. De Gruyter. pp. 293-308.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  37. Suárez's Nominalist Master Argument: Metaphysical Disputations 5, 1.Jorge Secada - 2014 - In Lukás Novák (ed.), Suárez's Metaphysics in its Historical and Systematic Context. De Gruyter. pp. 211-236.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  38. Scotus and Suárez on Sympathy: The Necessity of the “Connexio Potentiarum” in The Present State.Anna Tropia - 2014 - In Lukás Novák (ed.), Suárez's Metaphysics in its Historical and Systematic Context. De Gruyter. pp. 275-292.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  39. Suárez y el destino de la metafísica. De Avicena a Heidegger.Leopoldo José Prieto López - 2013 - Madrid: Biblioteca de Autores Cristianos.
    El interés por la obra filosófica del P. Francisco Suárez, de la Compañía de Jesús, está hoy más vivo que nunca. No se limita únicamente a los estudiosos españoles, sino que se extiende a otros países (como EE.UU., Francia, Alemania, Italia, etc.) donde los estudios sobre la filosofía de Suárez han adquirido una notoria relevancia. Motivo de este interés es la creciente conciencia de la modernidad de su filosofía, certificada por la recepción de no pocas de sus ideas en el (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  40. Ens Rationis From Suárez to Caramuel: A Study in Scholasticism of the Baroque Era.Daniel Novotny - 2013 - Fordham University Press.
    In this groundbreaking book, Daniel D. Novotny explores one of the most controversial topics of Suarez's philosophy: "beings of reason." Beings of reason are impossible intentional objects, such as blindness and square-circle.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  41. ‘The Pope and Prince of All the Metaphysicians’: Some Recent Works on Suárez.Sydney Penner - 2013 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 21 (2):393 - 403.
    (2013). ‘The Pope and Prince of All the Metaphysicians’: Some Recent Works on Suárez. British Journal for the History of Philosophy: Vol. 21, No. 2, pp. 393-403. doi: 10.1080/09608788.2013.771251.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  42. Free and Rational: Suárez on the Will.Sydney Penner - 2013 - Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 95 (1):1-35.
    Despite the importance of Suárez’s defense of the freedom of the will at the threshold of early modern philosophy, his account has received scant recent attention. This paper aims partially to redress that neglect. Suárez’s position can be understood as a balancing act between desiring to attribute libertarian freedom to agents and desiring to maintain the will’s status as a rational appetite. Hence, he rejects an intellectualism that says that choices are necessitated by the intellect’s judgements (since he does not (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  43. Suárez on the Reduction of Categorical Relations.Sydney Penner - 2013 - Philosophers' Imprint 13:1-24.
  44. Über Die Individualität Und Das Individuationsprinzip Ii: Anmerkungen. Fünfte Methaphysische Disputation.Francisco Suárez - 2013 - Felix Meiner Verlag.
    In der Fünften metaphysischen Disputation behandelt Suárez die Definition der Individualität, das metaphysische Individuationsprinzip und das physische Individuationsprinzip der Substanzen und Akzidentien. Die Darlegung berücksichtigt einen großen Teil der damals maßgeblichen Literatur und gibt zugleich einen Eindruck von der Schulphysik des späten 16. Jahrhunderts.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  45. Über Die Individualität Und Das Individuationsprinzip I: Fünfte Metaphysische Disputation.Francisco Suárez - 2013 - Felix Meiner Verlag.
    In der Fünften metaphysischen Disputation behandelt Suárez die Definition der Individualität, das metaphysische Individuationsprinzip und das physische Individuationsprinzip der Substanzen und Akzidentien. Die Darlegung berücksichtigt einen großen Teil der damals maßgeblichen Literatur und gibt zugleich einen Eindruck von der Schulphysik des späten 16. Jahrhunderts.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  46. Quasi-Absolute Time in Francisco Suárez's Metaphysical Disputations.Emmaline Bexley - 2012 - Intellectual History Review 22 (1):5-22.
    Suárez's discussion of time in the Metaphysical Disputations is one of the earliest long treatises on time (extending over sixty pages), and includes detailed arguments supporting the view that physical actions take place within an absolute temporal reference frame. Whereas some previous thinkers, such as John Duns Scotus and Peter Aureole, had made tantalising suggestions that time exists independently of physical changes, their ideas were primarily negative theses in response to perceived problems with the dominant view that time was caused (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  47. Suárez's Last Stand for the Substantial Form.Helen Hattab - 2012 - In Benjamin Hill & Henrik Lagerlund (eds.), The Philosophy of Francisco Suárez. Oxford University Press.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  48. Suarezismus. Erkenntnistheoretisches Aus Dem Nachlass des Jesuitengenerals Tirso Gonzáles de Santalla (1624-1705) (Review). [REVIEW]Sydney Penner - 2012 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 50 (3):459-460.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  49. Unity in the Multiplicity of Suárez's Soul.Marleen Rozemond - 2012 - In Benjamin Hill & Henrik Lagerlund (eds.), The Philosophy of Francisco Suárez. Oxford University Press.
    Suárez held that the vital faculties of the soul are really distinct from the soul itself and each other and that they cannot causally interact. This means that he needed to account for the connections between the activities of the faculties: they both interfere with and contribute to each other’s activities. Suárez does so by giving the soul a direct causal role in these activities. This role requires the unity of the soul of a living being and Suárez used it (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  50. Doyle, John P. Collected Studies on Francisco Suárez, S.J. (1548-1617).Marco Sgarbi - 2012 - Review of Metaphysics 65 (4):866-868.
1 — 50 / 131