Free Will

Edited by Justin Capes (Flagler College)
About this topic
Summary Most philosophers and laypeople believe that under most conditions human beings, perhaps along with some other animals, possess a power of selecting and implementing actions which is special. This power is very widely held to be a necessary condition of responsibility for actions, for autonomy and for being entitled to take pride in (or to feel shame for) one's achievements. The free will debate in philosophy aims at elucidating the nature of that power as well as at identifying potential threats to it and explaining how it can exist. A major focus of the debate is the compatibility of free will with causal determinism. A minority of philosophers deny that we have free will because free will is incompatible with causal determinism.
Key works The free will debate is ancient in Western philosophy, but was first developed systematically by scholastic thinkers concerning about the relationship free will and God's foreknowledge (eg Ockham 1983). The rise of mechanistic science brought determinism to the forefront and played an important role in the development of compatibilism by philosophers like Hume (David 1751). The advent of Frankfurt-style cases (Frankfurt 1969) transformed the late 20th century debate, by allowing compatibilists to dispense with the principle of alternate possibilities (see McKenna & Widerker 2003 for important contributions to this debate). At the same time, important new libertarian views have been developed by thinkers like Robert Kane (Kane 1996) and Timothy O'Connor (O'Connor 2000). Very recently, there has been a revival of free will skepticism (Strawson 1994; Levy 2011).
Introductions O'Connor 2005;McKenna 2008; Clarke & Capes ms
Related categories

8339 found
1 — 50 / 8339
Material to categorize
  1. Recension av Ann Heberlein, Etik: människa, moral, mening. [REVIEW]Gustav Alexandrie - 2015 - Filosofisk Tidskrift 36 (1):43-48.
  2. LEVY-BRUHL, LUCIEN. Morceaux Choisis.Harry Alpert - 1939 - Journal of Social Philosophy 5:192.
  3. Ii. Causality and Logic.John Anderson - 1936 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 14 (4):309 – 313.
  4. Choice - the Essential Element in Human Action - Donagan,A.B. Aune - unknown
  5. Laws of Freedom.R. J. B. - 1965 - Review of Metaphysics 19 (1):152-153.
  6. Thought and Action.S. F. Barker & Stuart Hampshire - 1962 - Philosophical Review 71 (3):392.
  7. L'acte Gratuit.André Berge - 1985
  8. Abolición Gradual y Libertades Vigiladas En El Río de la Plata. La Política de Control de Libertos de 1813Gradual Abolition and Supervised Freedom in the Rio de la Plata. The Freedmen Control Policy.Magdalena Candioti - 2016 - Corpus: Revue de philosophie.
  9. Social Responsibility and the Scientist in Modern Western Society.Ernst Boris Chain - 1971 - Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 14 (3):347-369.
  10. Epistemic Aspects of Action Systems.Janusz Czelakowski - 2015 - In Freedom and Enforcement in Action. Springer Verlag.
  11. The Cosmology of Freedom.F. D. D. - 1975 - Review of Metaphysics 28 (4):762-762.
  12. The Normal Pattern of Man's Ethical Behaviour.Victorino De La Fuente - 1967 - New York: Pageant Press.
  13. Firming the Foundations : Constitutionalizing and Memorializing the Free World Complex.Daniel Deudney - 1999 - In Josef Janning, Charles Kupchan & Dirk Rumberg (eds.), Civic Engagement in the Atlantic Community. Bertelsmann Foundation Publishers.
  14. Corporations and Morality.Thomas Digby - 1983 - Review of Metaphysics 36 (4):921-922.
  15. Teilhabe und Gottes Freiheit : Zum Freiheitsverständnis in Hans Urs von Balthasars Theodramatik.Jörg Disse - 2009 - In Edith Düsing, Werner Neuer & Hans-Dieter Klein (eds.), Geist und Heiliger Geist: Philosophische und theologische Modelle von Paulus und Johannes bis Barth und Balthasar. Königshausen & Neumann. pp. 351-370.
    Analyses Balthasar's idea of human freedom as a participation to Divine Freedom.
  16. Kierkegaards Phänomenologie der Freiheitserfahrung.Jörg Disse - 1994 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 56 (4):782-783.
  17. Kierkegaards Phänomenologie der Freiheitserfahrung.Jörg Disse - 1991 - Verlag Karl Alber.
    The book deals with the structure of our concrete experience of freedom according to the existence analysis of Kierkegaard in his pseudonymous works. Contrary to the (pre-)judgment of Modernity that freedom could only be adequately understood as full autonomy, Kierkegaard’s analysis shows that the highest form of freedom is realized not in full autonomy but in a relationship with God and therefore in a dialectic of autonomy and dependence. The starting point of the interpretation is the idea that Kierkegaard’s stages (...)
  18. A Mistake in Anscombe's Account of Voluntary Action.Thomas J. Donaldson - 1978 - Journal of Value Inquiry 12 (4):307-310.
  19. Yeomans, Christopher. Freedom and Reflection: Hegel and the Logic of Agency. [REVIEW]Steven M. Duncan - 2012 - Review of Metaphysics 66 (1):174-175.
  20. Empiricism, Necessity and Freedom.Berkley B. Eddins - 1963 - Review of Metaphysics 16 (3):556 - 558.
  21. What is It Like to Be Free?Matthew C. Eshleman - 2010 - In Jonathan Webber (ed.), Reading Sartre: On Phenomenology and Existentialism. Routledge.
  22. Response to Rem B. Edwards.Hanspeter Fetz - 1999 - Kriterion: Journal of Philosophy 13 (1):31-34.
  23. Time, Action and Necessity.Paul Fitzgerald - 1984 - Review of Metaphysics 37 (3):621-623.
  24. Responsibility and the Scientist.M. Forge - 1998 - In Martin Bridgstock (ed.), Science, Technology, and Society: An Introduction. Cambridge University Press. pp. 40.
  25. Freedom of Mind and Other Essays. [REVIEW]Harry G. Frankfurt - 1973 - Journal of Philosophy 70 (13):418-421.
  26. The Basis of Indeterminism.Shan Gao - manuscript
  27. Dibattito Su L'autocritique de la Science Con Levy-Lebrond.Ludovico Geymonat - 1973 - Scientia 7.
  28. The Very Idea of Free Will.John D. Glenn Jr - 2011 - Southwest Philosophy Review 27 (1):65-71.
  29. Irreplaceability and Unique Value.Christopher Grau - 2004 - Philosophical Topics 32 (1&2):111-129.
    This essay begins with a consideration of one way in which animals and persons may be valued as “irreplaceable.” Drawing on both Plato and Pascal, I consider reasons for skepticism regarding the legitimacy of this sort of attachment. While I do not offer a complete defense against such skepticism, I do show that worries here may be overblown due to the conflation of distinct metaphysical and normative concerns. I then go on to clarify what sort of value is at issue (...)
  30. Claudia Portioli (ed.), Natura e libertà (Perugia: Morlacchi, 2009). [REVIEW]Lorenzo Greco - 2011 - Rivista di Filosofia 102 (2):322-23.
  31. Algunas Presuposiciones Metafísicas de la Acción Humana.John Haldane - 1994 - Anuario Filosófico 27 (3):923-938.
    In opposition to compatibilism, it is argued that the thesis of universal causal determinism is at odds with the idea of free action. Free agency involves liberty of indifference -that is to say the non-determination of action by antecedent events-. Action issues from habitual behavioural tendencies; but this relation is neither deterministic nor random: it is one of propensity, in this case conditioned by practical rationality. In general, specifying reasons for action is not identifying antecedent causes but describing the intentional (...)
  32. The Role and Responsibility of the Moral Philosopher. Hallett - 1982 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 56:95-101.
  33. Moral Freedom and Metaphysics.William Halverson - 1966 - World Futures 4 (4):61-70.
  34. Freedom and Plastic Control.Alastair Hannay - 1972 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 2 (2):277 - 296.
  35. Prediction and Moral Appraisal.R. M. Hare - 1978 - Midwest Studies in Philosophy 3 (1):17-27.
  36. Thought and Action.Errol Harris - 1958 - Review of Metaphysics 12 (3):449 - 461.
  37. Willensfreiheit und die Autonomie der Kulturwissenschaften.Dirk Hartmann - 2005 - E-Journal Philosophie der Psychologie 1.
  38. The Problem of Historical Responsibility.L. Heidbrink - 1996 - Philosophisches Jahrbuch 103 (2):225-247.
  39. Oppression and Responsibility: A Wittgensteinian Approach to Social Practices and Moral Theory.Paul F. Johnson - 2001 - Philosophical Investigations 28 (1):83-86.
  40. Recensie: Voerman en van de Laar: Vrije Wil. [REVIEW]Fleur Jongepier - 2011 - Wijsgerig Perspectief 51 (3):38-39.
  41. The Argument From Illusion in Aristotle's Metaphysics (Γ, 1009-10).Anthony Kenny - 1967 - Mind 76 (302):184-197.
  42. Narrative Responsibility and Moral Dilemma: A Case Study of a Family's Decision About a Brain-Dead Daughter.Takanobu Kinjo & Masahiro Morioka - 2011 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 32 (2):91-99.
    A brain death case is presented and reinterpreted using the narrative approach. In the case, two Japanese parents face a dilemma about whether to respect their daughter’s desire to donate organs even though, for them, it would mean literally killing their daughter. We argue that the ethical dilemma occurred because the parents were confronted with two conflicting narratives to which they felt a “narrative responsibility,” namely, the responsibility that drives us to tell, retell, and coauthor the (often unfinished) narratives of (...)
  43. Governing of the Self: Laws and Freedom.Richard Kuhns - 1987 - In Robert Stern (ed.), Theories of the Unconscious and Theories of the Self. Analytic Press. pp. 48.
  44. Free From the Problem of Freedom.John Lachs - 1987 - Tulane Studies in Philosophy 35:17-22.
  45. Introduction: Through Contexts to Actions.Anton Leist - unknown
  46. A Pie-Model of Moral Responsibility.Hans Lenk & Matthias Maring - 1991 - In Georg Schurz (ed.), Advances in Scientific Philosophy. pp. 483--494.
  47. Free Will: Interpretations, Implementations and Assessments.López-Corredoira Martín - forthcoming - Nova Science Publ..
  48. The Nature of Moral Responsibility. [REVIEW]G. M. - 1973 - Review of Metaphysics 27 (1):155-156.
  49. Choice and Chance.F. S. M. - 1967 - Review of Metaphysics 20 (4):733-733.
  50. Freedom and the Moral Life.M. B. M. - 1971 - Review of Metaphysics 25 (1):136-136.
1 — 50 / 8339