Free Will

Edited by Justin Capes (Flagler College)
About this topic
Summary Most philosophers and laypeople believe that under most conditions human beings, perhaps along with some other animals, possess a power of selecting and implementing actions which is special. This power is very widely held to be a necessary condition of responsibility for actions, for autonomy and for being entitled to take pride in (or to feel shame for) one's achievements. The free will debate in philosophy aims at elucidating the nature of that power as well as at identifying potential threats to it and explaining how it can exist. A major focus of the debate is the compatibility of free will with causal determinism. A minority of philosophers deny that we have free will because free will is incompatible with causal determinism.
Key works The free will debate is ancient in Western philosophy, but was first developed systematically by scholastic thinkers concerning about the relationship free will and God's foreknowledge (eg Ockham 1983). The rise of mechanistic science brought determinism to the forefront and played an important role in the development of compatibilism by philosophers like Hume (David 1751). The advent of Frankfurt-style cases (Frankfurt 1969) transformed the late 20th century debate, by allowing compatibilists to dispense with the principle of alternate possibilities (see McKenna & Widerker 2003 for important contributions to this debate). At the same time, important new libertarian views have been developed by thinkers like Robert Kane (Kane 1996) and Timothy O'Connor (O'Connor 2000). Very recently, there has been a revival of free will skepticism (Strawson 1994; Levy 2011).
Introductions O'Connor 2005;McKenna 2008; Clarke & Capes ms
Related categories

8321 found
1 — 50 / 8321
Material to categorize
  1. Erratum To: On the Irrationality of Mind-Uploading: A Reply to Neil Levy.Nicholas Agar - 2014 - AI and Society 29 (1):137-137.
  2. Recension av Ann Heberlein, Etik: människa, moral, mening. [REVIEW]Gustav Alexandrie - 2015 - Filosofisk Tidskrift 36 (1):43-48.
  3. Answering the Free-Rider.Jim Allan - 1996 - Auslegung 21 (2).
    This article considers whether it is possible to answer the free-rider from the perspective of the moral sceptic like David Hume and John Mackie. The author considers these philosophers' arguments but finds them ultimately unconvincing. Nevertheless, the author argues that the moral sceptic can still condemn the free-rider, even if she cannot answer him or convince him to change.
  4. LEVY-BRUHL, LUCIEN. Morceaux Choisis.Harry Alpert - 1939 - Journal of Social Philosophy 5:192.
  5. Choice - the Essential Element in Human Action - Donagan,A.B. Aune - unknown
  6. Laws of Freedom.R. J. B. - 1965 - Review of Metaphysics 19 (1):152-153.
  7. A Funny Picture of Freedom, and How to Treat It.Donald R. Barker - 1976 - Behavior and Philosophy 4 (1):119.
  8. L'acte Gratuit.André Berge - 1985
  9. Wittgenstein on Voluntary Actions, JORGE V. ARREGUI.Daniel Berthold-Bond - 1992 - International Philosophical Quarterly 32 (3).
  10. Joachim Metallmann-Causality, Determinism and Science.Tomasz Bigaj - 2001 - Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 74:53-64.
  11. We Will Die and Will Be Free.Costica Bradatan - 2014 - Angelaki 19 (4):127-139.
    :This article has a dual purpose. On the one hand, I propose a Gnostic reading of Krzysztof Kieślowski's The Double Life of Véronique . In this interpretation, the figure of the puppeteer, who is eventually revealed to be the maker of the film's story, stands for the Gnostic demiurge. He creates puppet-people only to discard and sacrifice them when he is done performing. On the other hand, I use the film as a springboard for launching a broader philosophical conversation, existentialist (...)
  12. Abolición Gradual y Libertades Vigiladas En El Río de la Plata. La Política de Control de Libertos de 1813Gradual Abolition and Supervised Freedom in the Rio de la Plata. The Freedmen Control Policy.Magdalena Candioti - 2016 - Corpus.
  13. Social Responsibility and the Scientist in Modern Western Society.Ernst Boris Chain - 1971 - Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 14 (3):347-369.
  14. 7 Soft Selves and Ecological Control.Andy Clark - 2007 - In Don Ross, David Spurrett, Harold Kincaid & G. Lynn Stephens (eds.), Distributed Cognition and the Will: Individual Volition and Social Context. MIT Press. pp. 101.
  15. What Collectives Are: Agency, Individualism and Legal Theory.David Copp - 1984 - Dialogue 23 (2):249-269.
  16. The Cosmology of Freedom.F. D. D. - 1975 - Review of Metaphysics 28 (4):762-762.
  17. Consciousness and Moral Responsibility.Felipe De Brigard - 2015 - Analysis 75 (4):661-667.
  18. Levy L.Fascultadc de Ciencias & C. I. Campo Grande - 1997 - Global Bioethics 10 (1-4):35-54.
  19. The Normal Pattern of Man's Ethical Behaviour.Victorino De La Fuente - 1967 - New York: Pageant Press.
  20. Book Review:Les Fondements du Droit. Emmanuel Levy. [REVIEW]Paul L. DeLargy - 1934 - Ethics 44 (2):262-.
  21. Firming the Foundations : Constitutionalizing and Memorializing the Free World Complex.Daniel Deudney - 1999 - In Josef Janning, Charles Kupchan & Dirk Rumberg (eds.), Civic Engagement in the Atlantic Community. Bertelsmann Foundation Publishers.
  22. Corporations and Morality.Thomas Digby - 1983 - Review of Metaphysics 36 (4):921-922.
  23. Teilhabe and Gottes Freiheit : Zum Freiheitsverständnis in Hans Urs von Balthasars Theodramatik.Jörg Disse - 2009 - In Edith Düsing, Werner Neuer & Hans-Dieter Klein (eds.), Geist Und Heiliger Geist: Philosophische Und Theologische Modelle von Paulus Und Johannes Bis Barth Und Balthasar. Königshausen & Neumann.
  24. Kierkegaards Phänomenologie der Freiheitserfahrung.Jörg Disse - 1994 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 56 (4):782-783.
  25. Kierkegaards Phänomenologie der Freiheitserfahrung.Jörg Disse - 1991 - Verlag Karl Alber.
    The book deals with the structure of our concrete experience of freedom according to the existence analysis of Kierkegaard in his pseudonymous works. Contrary to the (pre-)judgment of Modernity that freedom could only be adequately understood as full autonomy, Kierkegaard’s analysis shows that the highest form of freedom is realized not in full autonomy but in a relationship with God and therefore in a dialectic of autonomy and dependence. The starting point of the interpretation is the idea that Kierkegaard’s stages (...)
  26. A Mistake in Anscombe's Account of Voluntary Action.Thomas J. Donaldson - 1978 - Journal of Value Inquiry 12 (4):307-310.
  27. The Non-Reality of Free Will.Richard Double - 1993 - Behavior and Philosophy 20:95-97.
  28. Yeomans, Christopher. Freedom and Reflection: Hegel and the Logic of Agency. [REVIEW]Steven M. Duncan - 2012 - Review of Metaphysics 66 (1):174-175.
  29. Responsibility of the Learned Journal.J. L. Dusseau - 1989 - Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 32 (3):344.
  30. Empiricism, Necessity and Freedom.Berkley B. Eddins - 1963 - Review of Metaphysics 16 (3):556 - 558.
  31. Nuclear War and Human Responsibility.J. T. Edsall - 1985 - Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 28 (2):208.
  32. Book Reviews:Moral Appraisability: Puzzles, Proposals, and Perplexities. [REVIEW]Andrew Eshleman - 2000 - Ethics 111 (1):167-170.
  33. What is It Like to Be Free?Matthew C. Eshleman - 2010 - In Jonathan Webber (ed.), Reading Sartre: On Phenomenology and Existentialism. Routledge.
  34. Response to Rem B. Edwards.Hanspeter Fetz - 1999 - Kriterion: Journal of Philosophy 13 (1):31-34.
  35. Time, Action and Necessity.Paul Fitzgerald - 1984 - Review of Metaphysics 37 (3):621-623.
  36. Responsibility and the Scientist.M. Forge - 1998 - In Martin Bridgstock (ed.), Science, Technology, and Society: An Introduction. Cambridge University Press. pp. 40.
  37. Toward Liquor Control.Raymond B. Fosdick & Albert L. Scott - 1934 - International Journal of Ethics 44 (2):264-265.
  38. Freedom of Mind and Other Essays. [REVIEW]Harry G. Frankfurt - 1973 - Journal of Philosophy 70 (13):418-421.
  39. On Morality and Chemistry.Hauke Fürstenwerth - 2003 - Poiesis and Praxis 2 (1):53-71.
    Cartesian separation and enlightenment have led to a widespread conceptual separation of science and technology. Consequently a certain philosophical tradition holds pure science as a metaphysical striving for irrefutable truth that is morally neutral and only ( dirty?) applications as morally accountable. An opposite extreme position holds scientists responsible for everything that is done with their discoveries. Based on an interpretation of science to be a social construct and the observation that moral criteria are the results of social processes the (...)
  40. The Basis of Indeterminism.Shan Gao - manuscript
  41. Dibattito Su L'autocritique de la Science Con Levy-Lebrond.Ludovico Geymonat - 1973 - Scientia 7.
  42. The Very Idea of Free Will.John D. Glenn Jr - 2011 - Southwest Philosophy Review 27 (1):65-71.
  43. A Construção de Mitos E Os Usos Do Passado Nacional: Vargas E Perón.Angela de Castro Gomes - 1997 - História 16:109-130.
  44. Excused by the Unwillingness of Others?R. E. Goodin - 2012 - Analysis 72 (1):18-24.
    No one is excused from doing what he ought to do merely because he is unwilling to do it. But what if others are unwilling to play their necessary role in some joint venture that you all ought to undertake: might that excuse you from doing what you yourself ought to do as part of that? It would, if you were genuinely willing to play your necessary part if they were. But the unwillingness of everyone involved cannot reciprocally serve to (...)
  45. Claudia Portioli (ed.), Natura e libertà (Perugia: Morlacchi, 2009). [REVIEW]Lorenzo Greco - 2011 - Rivista di Filosofia 102 (2):322-23.
  46. On Hartshorne’s Objections to Determinism and Compatibilism.Hakan Gundogdu - 2014 - Eikasia Revista de Philosophia 54:93-106.
    The problem of determinism and human freedom, which is one of the great debates in philosophy, has been discussed many times by philosophers who have very distinctive perspectives and thereby different results related to the problem. Charles Hartshorne as an American process philosopher has significantly contributed to the debate with his own thoughts and considerations. His thoughts can be divided into two major parts. First is the claim that there is a relative indeterminism within the universe. Second is that (hard) (...)
  47. The Sociological Legacy of Lucien Levy-Bruhl.Georges Gurvitch - 1939 - Journal of Social Philosophy 5:61.
  48. The Role and Responsibility of the Moral Philosopher. Hallett - 1982 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 56:95-101.
  49. Moral Freedom and Metaphysics.William Halverson - 1966 - World Futures 4 (4):61-70.
  50. Forensic Cultures in Historical Perspective: Technologies of Witness, Testimony, Judgment.Christopher Hamlin - 2013 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 44 (1):4-15.
    This article explores the history of forensic science in terms of ideologies and institutions rather than developing technique. It presents an analytical framework for characterizing forensic institutions and practices, past and present. That framework highlights the distinct issues of means of witness, accredited testimony, and the reaching of juridical decisions. The article applies the framework by comparing four forensic ‘formations,’ which have been prominent at various times and places in the western world from the early modern period onward: these are (...)
1 — 50 / 8321