This category needs an editor. We encourage you to help if you are qualified.
Volunteer, or read more about what this involves.
Related categories
Siblings:
6394 found
Search inside:
(import / add options)   Order:
1 — 50 / 6394
  1. R. A. (1956). Études Sur la Signification Historique de la Philosophie de Leibniz. [REVIEW] Review of Metaphysics 9 (4):701-701.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2. Hans Aarsleff (1975). Schulenburg's Leibniz Als Sprachforscher, with Some Observations on Leibniz and the Study of Language. Studia Leibnitiana 7 (1):122 - 134.
    This book is the best and most comprehensive treatment we have of Leibniz' study of natural languages, on the same high level of scholarship, knowledge, and insight as the essay Sigrid von der Schulenburg published in 1937. With its rich detail and source references, it is indispensable both to Leibniz scholars and to students of the history of the study of language. The editor's careful indices make it possible to use the book also as a work of reference. The reviewer (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3. Hans Aarsleff (1964). Leibniz on Locke on Language. American Philosophical Quarterly 1 (3):165-188.
  4. Uygar Abaci (2013). Leibniz and Kant on Existence and the Syntheticity of Existential Statements. In Margit Ruffing, Claudio La Rocca, Alfredo Ferrarin & Stefano Bacin (eds.), Kant Und Die Philosophie in Weltbürgerlicher Absicht: Akten des Xi. Kant-Kongresses 2010. De Gruyter. pp. 297-308.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5. Abelson Abelson (1955). OST'S Leibniz and Philosophical Analysis. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 16:564.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6. William E. Abraham (1975). Predication. Studia Leibnitiana 7 (1):1 - 20.
    Paralogismen betreffs der Leibnizschen Prädikatlehre werden aufgezeigt und widerlegt. Enthaltensein heißt die Inverse von Ableitung; den zwei Arten von Ableitung, die Leibniz kennt, entsprechen zwei Arten von Enthaltensein. Die beiden Arten von Enthaltensein bieten Leibniz die Möglichkeit zu der logischen und irreduziblen Unterscheidung zwischen notwendigen und bedingten Wahrheiten. Die Unterscheidung zwischen einem Individuum und einer Eigenschaft wird mit mengentheoretischen Methoden und auch mit Hilfe von epistemologischen Begriffen untersucht. Die besondere kategorische Form des Aussagesatzes impliziert, daß es für alle Aussagesätze nur (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7. William E. Abraham (1969). Complete Concepts and Leibniz's Distinction Between Necessary and Contingent Propositions. Studia Leibnitiana 1 (4):263 - 279.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8. Cassiano Abranches (1946). O Infinifismo de Leibniz: A proposito de um centenário. Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 2 (3):235 - 245.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9. Narziss Ach & Andreas Hillgruber (1914). I. Eine Serienmethode Für Reaktionsversuche. Philosophical Review 23 (3):368-370.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10. Wilhelm Ackermann (1956). Begründung Einer Strengen Implikation. Journal of Symbolic Logic 21 (2):113-128.
  11. Christopher Adair-Toteff (1995). News From Bulgaria. The Leibniz Review 5:40-40.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12. Adams Robert Merrihew (1999). Leibniz: Determinist, Theist, Idealist. Oup Usa.
    Adams presents an in-depth interpretation of three important parts of Leibniz's metaphysics, thoroughly grounded in the texts as well as in philosophical analysis and critique. The three areas discussed are the metaphysical part of Leibniz's philosophy of logic, his essentially theological treatment of the central issues of ontology, and his theory of substance. Adams' work helps make sense of one of the great classic systems of modern philosophy.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13. Adams Robert Merrihew (1994). Leibniz: Determinist, Theist, Idealist. Oxford University Press.
    Legendary since his own time as a universal genius, Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz (1646-1716) contributed significantly to almost every branch of learning. One of the creators of modern mathematics, and probably the most sophisticated logician between the Middle Ages and Frege, as well as a pioneer of ecumenical theology, he also wrote extensively on such diverse subjects as history, geology, and physics. But the part of his work that is most studied today is probably his writings in metaphysics, which have been (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   49 citations  
  14. R. M. Adams (1988). Mates, B., "The Philosophy of Leibniz: Metaphysics and Language". [REVIEW] Mind 97:299.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15. Rm Adams (1993). Form and Matter in Leibniz's Physics. The Middle Years. Studia Leibnitiana 25 (2):132-152.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16. Robert Merrihew Adams (2010). Continuity and Development of Leibniz's Metaphysics of Body: A Response to Daniel Garber’s Leibniz: Body, Substance, Monad. The Leibniz Review 20:51-71.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17. Robert Merrihew Adams (2010). Continuity and Development of Leibniz’s Metaphysics of Body. Leibniz Society Review 20:51-71.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18. Robert Merrihew Adams (2009). Leibniz: An Intellectual Biography. [REVIEW] The Leibniz Review 19:113-116.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19. Robert Merrihew Adams (2009). Leibniz. Leibniz Society Review 19:113-116.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20. Robert Merrihew Adams (2008). G. W Leibniz. Leibniz Society Review 18:135-137.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21. Robert Merrihew Adams (2008). G. W Leibniz. The Leibniz Review 18:135-137.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22. Robert Merrihew Adams (2008). G. W Leibniz: Richerche generali sull’analisi delle nozioni e dell verità e altri scritti di logica. [REVIEW] The Leibniz Review 18:135-137.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23. Robert Merrihew Adams (2002). Review: Substance and Individuation in Leibniz. [REVIEW] Mind 111 (444):851-855.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24. Robert Merrihew Adams (2001). Scritti Filosofici. [REVIEW] The Leibniz Review 11:25-28.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25. Robert Merrihew Adams (2000). Trinità E Incarnazione. The Leibniz Review 10:53-60.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26. Robert Merrihew Adams (2000). Leibniz's Conception of Religion. The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 7:57-70.
    Leibniz’s religious cosmopolitanism is one of the main ways in which his thought foreshadows the Enlightenment. Of the controversial issues of his time, it is the one on which he was boldest. His commitment to it is discussed here in relation to both the Chinese Rites Controversy and the reunion of Christendom, and the main features of his conception of religion are discussed. (1) It is a religious and normative conception. (2) Its main principle is “the love of God above (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27. Robert Merrihew Adams (1997). Sleigh's Leibniz & Arnauld: A Commentary on Their Correspondence. Noûs 31 (2):266–277.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28. Robert Merrihew Adams (1996). Response to Carriero, Mugnai, and Garber. The Leibniz Review 6:107-125.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  29. Robert Merrihew Adams (1996). Response to Carriero, Mugnai, and Garber. Leibniz Society Review 6:107-125.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30. Robert Merrihew Adams (1994). Leibniz's Examination of the Christian Religion. Faith and Philosophy 11 (4):517-546.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  31. Robert Merrihew Adams (1994). Theodicy and Divine Intervention. In Thomas F. Tracy (ed.), The God Who Acts: Philosophical and Theological Explorations. Pennsylvania State University Press.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32. Robert Merrihew Adams (1993). Form und Materie bei Leibniz: die mittleren Jahre. Studia Leibnitiana 25 (2):132.
    Recent influential interpreters have argued that the philosophy of body that prevails in Leibniz's writings from the 1680' s to about 1704 is both more Aristotelian and less idealistic than the ' monadology' of his last years. It is argued here that the Aristotelian terminology of matter and form which is undoubtedly prominent in the work of Leibniz's ' middle years' was understood by him in a sense that is consistent with the monadology. The monadology is foreshadowed, moreover, in important (...)
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33. Robert Merrihew Adams (1983). Phenomenalism and Corporeal Substance in Leibniz. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 8 (1):217-257.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  34. Robert Merrihew Adams & Nicholas Jolley (1996). The Cambridge Companion to Leibniz. Philosophical Review 105 (2):245.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35. Joao Maurício Adeodato (2010). Antworten der juristischen Dogmatik auf zwei wichtige Probleme der Rechtsphilosophie. Rechtstheorie 41 (3):285-304.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  36. H. J. Adriaanse (1980). Enige godsdienstwijsgerige beschouwingen N.A.V. A. Vergote's boek „bekentenis en begeerte”. Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 42 (4):678 - 695.
    Der Artikel ist der Text eines Vortrags der gehalten wurde an den jüngsten Studientagen der (Löwener) Gesellschaft für Philosophie, an denen A. Vergotes Buch „Bekenntnis und Begierde” (Delle et Désir, Bekentenis en Begeerte) das Thema bildete. Der Auftrag war eine religionsphilosophische Betrachtung dieses Buches anzustellen. Der Einstieg für eine solche Betrachtung muß noch erst gefunden werden : als religionspsychologische Studie, bzw. „psychoanalytische Aufklärung“ ist es methodisch neutral gegen philosophische und theologische Fragen. Drei Tatbestände rechtfertigen jedoch eine solche Betrachtung : 1) (...)
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37. Axel Adrian (2010). Wie wissenschaftlich ist die Rechtswissenschaft?: Gibt es eine bindende Methodenlehre? Rechtstheorie 41 (4):521-548.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38. Marcello D' Agostino (1984). Leibniz E la Geometria Nascosta. Epistemologia 7 (1):3.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39. J. Aguado (1997). Massimo Mugnai: Leibniz's Theory of Relations. Synthesis Philosophica 12:574-576.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40. Ricardo Gutiérrez Aguilar (2009). Rovira, R., Léxico Fundamental de la Metafísica de Leibniz. Anuario Filosófico 41 (3):710-712.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41. Alexander Aichele (2010). Full Competency or Restriction? Alexander Gottlieb Baumgarten's Critique of Christian Wolff's Concept of Philosophy. Studia Leibnitiana 42 (2):162-185.
  42. E. Aiton (1989). Discourse on Metaphysics and Related Writings. [REVIEW] British Journal for the History of Science 22 (1):100-100.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43. E. J. Aiton (2006). An Unpublished Letter of Leibniz to Sloane. Annals of Science 38 (1):103-107.
    Soon after receiving Bouvet's interpretation of the hexagrams of the I ching as binary numbers, Leibniz communicated this application of his binary arithmetic to Hans Sloane in a letter published here for the first time. The letter also included a report on the observations of the variable star in the neck of the Swan by Gottfried Kirch. Sloane sent a copy of the scientific parts of the letter to Flamsteed.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44. E. J. Aiton (1990). G. W. Leibniz: Iter Italicum : La Dynamique de la République des Lettres: Nombreux Textes inéditsAndré Robinet. Isis 81 (2):349-349.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45. E. J. Aiton (1977). The Vortex Theory of Planetary Motions. Studia Leibnitiana 9 (1):146-147.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   11 citations  
  46. E. J. Aiton (1975). Leibniz and Dynamics. The Texts of 1692Pierre Costabel R. E. W. Maddison. Isis 66 (1):129-130.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47. E. J. Aiton (1965). An Imaginary Error in the Celestial Mechanics of Leibniz. Annals of Science 21 (3):169-173.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  48. E. J. Aiton (1964). The Celestial Mechanics of Leibniz : A New Interpretation. Annals of Science 20 (2):111-123.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  49. E. J. Aiton & Eikoh Shimao (2006). Gorai Kinzō's Study of Leibniz and the I Ching Hexagrams. Annals of Science 38 (1):71-92.
    When Bouvet discovered the relationship between the binary arithmetic of Leibniz and the hexagrams of the I ching—in reality only a purely formal correspondence—he sent to Leibniz a woodcut diagram of the Fu-Hsi arrangement, which provides the key to the analogy. This diagram, in a re-drawn version, was first published by Gorai Kinzō in a study of Leibniz's interpretation of the I ching and Confucianism which has been influential in providing, indirectly, the principal source for the accounts of Wilhelm and (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50. Eric Aiton (1986). The Application of the Infinitesimal Calculus to Some Physical Problems by Leibniz and His Friends. Studia Leibnitiana 14:133.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
1 — 50 / 6394