Related categories

43 found
Order:
  1. added 2020-04-14
    Justice and the Tendency Towards Good: The Role of Custom in Hume’s Theory of Moral Motivation.James Chamberlain - forthcoming - Hume Studies.
    Given the importance of sympathetic pleasures within Hume’s account of approval and moral motivation, why does Hume think we feel obliged to act justly on those occasions when we know that doing so will benefit nobody? I argue that Hume uses the case of justice as evidence for a key claim regarding all virtues. Hume does not think we approve of token virtuous actions, whether natural or artificial, because they cause or aim to cause happiness in others. It is sufficient (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  2. added 2019-06-06
    The Account of the Nature of Moral Evaluation in Hume's "Treatise".Páll S. Árdal - 1964 - Philosophy 39:341.
  3. added 2019-01-23
    The Humean Approach to Moral Diversity.Mark Collier - 2013 - Journal of Scottish Philosophy 11 (1):41-52.
    In ‘A Dialogue’, Hume offers an important reply to the moral skeptic. Skeptics traditionally point to instances of moral diversity in support of the claim that our core values are fixed by enculturation. Hume argues that the skeptic exaggerates the amount of variation in moral codes, however, and fails to adopt an indulgent stance toward attitudes different from ours. Hume proposes a charitable interpretation of moral disagreement, moreover, which traces it back to shared principles of human nature. Contemporary philosophers attempt (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  4. added 2017-08-14
    The Common Point of View in Hume’s Ethics.Rachel Cohon - 1997 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 57 (4):827-850.
    Hume’s moral philosophy makes sentiment essential to moral judgment. But there is more individual consistency and interpersonal agreement in moral judgment than in private emotional reactions. Hume accounts for this by saying that our moral judgments do not manifest our approval or disapproval of character traits and persons “only as they appear from [our] peculiar point of view... ” Rather, “we fix on some steady and general points of view; and always, in our thoughts, place ourselves in them, whatever may (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  5. added 2017-06-09
    Hume E o empirismo na moral.Adriano Naves de Brito - 2001 - Philósophos - Revista de Filosofia 6 (1/2).
    O que pretendo defender neste texto é que uma posição empirista na moral é compatível com uma pretensão de validade intersubjetiva de juízos morais. Essa pretensão deve, nesse caso, estar calcada na naturalização dos fundamentos da moralidade, mas tem de conviver com limites acerca da justificação de enunciados de valor. Para defender esse ponto, sirvo-me da filosofia moral de Hume, como ele a expôs no seu texto Uma investigação sobre os princípios da moral. No que diz respeito à filosofia de (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  6. added 2017-06-09
    Harrison, J., Hume's Moral Epistemology. [REVIEW]H. De Dijn - 1978 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 40:137.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  7. added 2017-03-10
    XV—Nature, Artifice and Moral Approbation.Christopher Cherry - 1975 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 76 (1):265-282.
    In Book III of A Treatise on Human Nature,' Hume puts two questions which he says are distinct. The first concerns "the manner in which the rules of justice are established by the artifice of men." The second concerns "the reasons which determine us to attribute to the observance or neglect of these rules a moral beauty and deformity." Whatever his sympathies, the reader is bound to be struck by the sustained ingenuity of Hume's answer to the first question. He (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  8. added 2017-01-10
    Sancho Panza y la objetividad del juicio moral en Hume.Miguel Cabrera - 2006 - Diálogos. Revista de Filosofía de la Universidad de Puerto Rico 41 (87):59-98.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  9. added 2017-01-09
    The Moral Sentiments in Hume’s Treatise.Åsa Carlson - 2014 - Hume Studies 40 (1):73-94.
    In the Treatise, Hume writes several seemingly incompatible things about the moral sentiments, thus there is no general agreement about where they fit within his taxonomy of the perceptions. Some passages speak in favor of the view that moral sentiments are indirect passions, a few in favor of the view that they are direct passions, and yet a couple of explicit statements strongly suggest otherwise. Due to these tensions in Hume’s text, we find at least five competing characterizations in the (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  10. added 2016-12-08
    Hume’s Rejection of Hutcheson’s Moral Theology.Miguel A. Badía Cabrera - 2013 - The European Legacy 18 (4):1-12.
    Hume did not criticize Hutcheson’s moral-empirical argument in his published philosophical works, even though he forcefully denied, especially in Parts X and XI of the Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion, that we could empirically prove the moral attributes of the Deity. Yet he seemingly rejected this particular reasoning in a famous letter to Hutcheson, dated March 16, 1740. Hutcheson’s claim that our moral sense is a likely to be expected effect of divine benevolence and Hume’s critique of this claim are analyzed (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  11. added 2016-09-14
    Effects on the Mind as Objects of Reasoning: A Perspectivist Reading of the Reason–Passion Relation in Hume's Ethics.Henrik Bohlin - 2014 - Hume Studies 40 (1):29-51.
    Hume’s ethics is concerned not only with the metaphysical status of moral qualities but equally, if not more, with the problem of determining to what extent and under what conditions issues of moral disagreement and inquiry can be decided by rational argumentation. This paper argues that Hume’s solution to the second problem is a form of perspectivism: the rational decidability of moral issues depends on the existence of shared perspectives, or sets of assumptions and correlated dispositions to feelings, and is (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  12. added 2016-02-25
    How to Be a Moral Taste Theorist.John McAteer - 2016 - Essays in Philosophy 17 (1):05-21.
    In this paper, I attempt to recover an 18th Century approach to moral theory that can be called Moral Taste Theory. Through an exploration of 18th Century sources I define the characteristics of moral taste theory and to distinguish it from its closest rival, moral sense theory. In general a moral taste theorist holds that moral judgments are analogous to aesthetic judgments while a moral sense theorist holds that moral judgments are analogous to physical sense perception. Francis Hutcheson was a (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  13. added 2016-01-30
    Reasoning About Morals From Butler to Hume.Aaron Garrett - 2012 - In Ruth Savage (ed.), Philosophy and Religion in Enlightenment Britain: New Case Studies. Oxford University Press.
  14. added 2016-01-30
    Aesthetics and Morals in the Philosophy of David Hume.Timothy M. Costelloe - 2007 - Routledge.
    The book has two aims. First, to examine the extent and significance of the connection between Hume's aesthetics and his moral philosophy; and, second, to consider how, in light of the connection, his moral philosophy answers central questions in ethics. The first aim is realized in chapters 1-4. Chapter 1 examines Hume's essay "Of the Standard of Taste" to understand his search for a "standard" and how this affects the scope of his aesthetics. Chapter 2 establishes that he treats beauty (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  15. added 2016-01-30
    JONES, PETER Hume's Sentiments: Their Ciceronian and French Context. [REVIEW]J. C. A. Gaskin - 1984 - Philosophy 59:408.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  16. added 2016-01-30
    KYDD, R. M. -Reason and Conduct in Hume's Treatise. [REVIEW]A. C. Ewing - 1946 - Mind 55:273.
  17. added 2015-12-05
    Moral Sentiment and Moral Judgment in Hume.Dennis Farrell Fried - 1977 - Dissertation, University of Massachusetts Amherst
  18. added 2015-11-07
    Hume's Theory of Moral Judgments.Lawrence Foster - 1966 - Dissertation, University of Pennsylvania
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  19. added 2015-09-04
    Moral Sense and Natural Reason.Maria Elton - 2008 - Review of Metaphysics 62 (1):79-110.
    The concern of this paper is to relate the moral philosophy of Hutcheson with a traditional point of view, according to which moral philosophy depends on natural theology. The analysis of this relationship is important because it is a crucial feature of the Hutchesonian moral philosophy. However, this theological outlook does not entirely match his empirical moral epistemology, and this inconsistency allowed David Hume and Adam Smith to throw aside the theological foundation, taking from Hutcheson only the empirical aspects of (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  20. added 2015-09-04
    Hume's Theory of Moral Judgment.Marvin Leon Easterling - 1958 - Dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  21. added 2015-07-03
    Simpatía y Espectáculo En la Moral de David Hume.Ángela Calvo de Saavedra - 1994 - Universitas Philosophica 22:11-28.
    La investigación humeana acerca de los principios de la moral parte de la pasión como motivo de la acción y al mismo tiempo pretende que su valoración ha de guiarse por la utilidad. Si bien son dos afirmaciones difíciles de combinar, la tesis del presente estudio es que la posibilidad de tender un puente entre la aspiración a la felicidad privada y el interés por el bienestar público está anclada, en su origen, en el sentimiento de benevolencia que el autor (...)
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  22. added 2015-06-09
    Beauty and Deformity: Hume, Kant, and the Nature of Moral Life.Timothy Michael Costelloe - 2001 - Dissertation, Emory University
    This dissertation investigates the role of beauty in the moral philosophies of Hume and Kant. It interprets Hume's thought by showing how he applies "beauty" to conduct and character as well as nature and art; how his "critique" of philosophical reason informs his view of morality; and how his approach compares and contrasts to that of Kant. ;Chapter one examines Hume's concept of "general rules," concluding that philosophy involves reflecting upon ordinary life and formulating "principles" to explain it. This clarifies (...)
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  23. added 2015-06-09
    A Personal Element in Morality.William Davie - 1988 - Hume Studies 14 (1):191-205.
  24. added 2015-06-09
    Hume's Apology.William Davie - 1987 - Hume Studies 13 (1):30-45.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  25. added 2015-06-09
    Hume's Theory of Moral Judgments in the 'Treatise.'.Kendall Boice Cox - 1963 - Dissertation, University of Michigan
  26. added 2015-06-04
    Obligation and Human Nature in Hume's Philosophy.Mendel F. Cohen - 1990 - Philosophical Quarterly 40 (160):316-341.
    It is commonly held that moral judgements are implicitly general — or universalizable — in that if anyone is morally obligated to perform or refrain from some action, everyone in relevantly similar circumstances is similarly obligated. I undertake here to show that David Hume fully subscribed to this thesis and that because of the way it is related to his conceptions of obligation and what he terms the practicality of morals he is pushed to insist that the moral sentiments of (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  27. added 2015-05-29
    Sobre la teoría de la evaluación moral de David Hume.J. L. Tasset Carmona - 1989 - Agora 8:53.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  28. added 2015-05-29
    Judgment and Sentiment in Hume's Moral Theory.Nicholas Capaldi - 1965 - Dissertation, Columbia University
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  29. added 2015-05-24
    John Passmore and Hume's Moral Philosophy.Keith Campbell - 1985 - Hume Studies 11 (2):109-124.
    This paper identifies passmore's interpretation of hume as having skeptical principles so powerful that they should issue in a complete irrationalist which he did not embrace. The idea of such an inconsistency within hume's philosophy is then applied to his theory of morals. The way of ideas, Pessimistic rationalism, And the theory of association should issue in moral skepticism. Instead, Hume equivocates between subjectivist and realist views of the relation between morality and our pleasure or pain in contemplation of actions.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  30. added 2015-05-24
    J.L. Mackie, Hume's Moral Theory. [REVIEW]Nicholas Capaldi - 1983 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 21 (2):250-252.
  31. added 2015-05-24
    Some Misconceptions About Hume's Moral Theory.Nicholas Capaldi - 1966 - Ethics 76 (3):208-211.
    There are eight major misconceptions about Hume's moral theory. First,many believe that there is no essential difference between the Treatise and the Enquiry. Second, some commentators believe that Hume has an extraordinary theory about the moral point of view. Third, many assume that Hume has an explicit theory of moral judgment. Fourth, several commentators have attributed to Hume a multiple theory about the relationship between moral judgment and moral sentiment. Fifth, some assert that Hume has a qualified- or ideal-spectator theory (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  32. added 2015-05-24
    Hume's Rejection of "Ought" as a Moral Category.Nicholas Capaldi - 1966 - Journal of Philosophy 63 (5):126-137.
    One of the most persistent issues of contemporary moral theory is the possibility of inferring moral judgments from factual nonmoral judgments. Another way of stating this issue is to inquire into the possibility of inferring "ought-judgments" from "is-judgments." It is generally accepted that the first person to deny the possibility of this inference was David Hume. The denial is supposed to be articulated in the last paragraph of the section of A Treatise of Human Nature entitled "Moral Distinctions not derived (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  33. added 2015-05-16
    Hume's Theory of Moral Judgment: A Study of "a Treatise of Human Nature".Walter Saul Brand - 1991 - Dissertation, City University of New York
    While Hume insists that "sympathy," or fellow feeling, is the primary source of moral evaluation, he recognizes that sympathetically acquired feelings vary in emotional intensity according to a number of factors he regards as morally irrelevant. The question arises as to how the changeableness of sympathy can be reconciled with the "stable" moral judgment. It emerges that the sympathetic judgment becomes corrected by adopting, what Hume calls, a "general point of view." Specifically, the theory of belief and "general rules" in (...)
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  34. added 2015-01-27
    Character Traits and the Humean Approach to Ethics.Donald Ainslie - 2007 - Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 94 (1):79-110.
  35. added 2015-01-25
    Two Portraits of the Humean Moral Agent.Kate Abramson - 2002 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 83 (4):301–334.
    Among contemporary ethicists, Hume is perhaps best known for his views about morality’s practical import and his spectator-centered account of moral evaluation. Yet according to the so-called “spectator complaint”, these two aspects of Hume’s moral theory cannot be reconciled with one another. I argue that the answer to the spectator complaint lies in Hume’s account of “goodness” and “greatness of mind”. Through a discussion of these two virtues, Hume makes clear the connection between his views about moral motivation and his (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   7 citations  
  36. added 2015-01-24
    Hume's Theory of Moral Judgment: A Study in the Unity of A Treatise of Human Nature (Review). [REVIEW]Elizabeth S. Radcliffe - 1994 - Hume Studies 19 (2):324-326.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  37. added 2015-01-24
    Walter Brand, Hume's Theory of Moral Judgment. [REVIEW]Fay Horton Sawyier - 1993 - Philosophy in Review 13 (2):77-79.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  38. added 2015-01-21
    Hume and Smith on Sympathy, Approbation, and Moral Judgment.Geoffrey Sayre-McCord - 2013 - Social Philosophy and Policy 30 (1-2):208-236.
    David Hume and Adam Smith are usually, and understandably, seen as developing very similar sentimentalist accounts of moral thought and practice. As similar as Hume's and Smith's accounts of moral thought are, they differ in telling ways. This essay is an attempt primarily to get clear on the important differences. They are worth identifying and exploring, in part, because of the great extent to which Hume and Smith share not just an overall approach to moral theory but also a conception (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  39. added 2015-01-21
    Hume's and Smith's Partial Sympathies and Impartial Stances.Jon Rick - 2007 - Journal of Scottish Philosophy 5 (2):135-158.
    The moral psychology of sympathy is the linchpin of the sentimentalist moral theories of both David Hume and Adam Smith. In this paper, I attempt to diagnose the critical differences between Hume's and Smith's respective accounts of sympathy in order to argue that Smithian sympathy is more properly suited to serve as a basis for impartial moral evaluations and judgments than is Humean sympathy. By way of arguing this claim, I take up the problem of overcoming sympathetic partiality in the (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  40. added 2015-01-18
    Mind and Morality: An Examination of Hume’s Moral Psychology.John Bricke - 1996 - Oxford University Press.
    This book is a penetrating study of the theory of mind and morality that Hume developed in his Treatise of Human Nature and other writings. Hume rejects any conception of moral beliefs and moral truths. He understands morality in terms of distinctive desires and other sentiments that arise through the correction of sympathy. Hume's theory presents a powerful challenge to recent cognitivist theories of moral judgement, Bricke argues, and suggests significant limitations to recent conventionalist and contractarian accounts of morality's content.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   19 citations  
  41. added 2015-01-16
    Hume's Theory of Moral Judgment: A Study in the Unity of A Treatise of Human Nature. [REVIEW]Robert A. Wilson - 1994 - Review of Metaphysics 48 (2):394-395.
    The central, general claim that Brand defends is that an understanding of Hume's view of general rules in book 1 of the Treatise is crucial to a full appreciation of Hume's account of moral judgment in book 3. Although Brand also discusses other respects in which the Treatise is a unified work, both the book's title and subtitle suggest a study more wide-ranging than we actually find. Moreover, discussion of some of the issues important for Brand's interpretation, such as the (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  42. added 2015-01-16
    Hume's Theory of Moral Judgment: A Study in the Unity of A Treatise of Human Nature.Walter Brand - 1993 - Hume Studies 19 (2):324-326.
  43. added 2015-01-14
    Hume's Sentimentalist Account of Moral Judgement.Julia Driver - 2012 - In Alan Bailey & Dan O'Brien (eds.), The Continuum Companion to Hume. Continuum. pp. 279.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark