This category needs an editor. We encourage you to help if you are qualified.
Volunteer, or read more about what this involves.

8 found
  1. Mental Faculties and Powers and the Foundations of Hume’s Philosophy.Karl Schafer - forthcoming - In Sebastian Bender & Dominik Perler (eds.), Powers and Abilities in Early Modern Philosophy. Routledge.
    With respect to the topic of “powers and abilities,” most readers will associate David Hume with his multi-pronged critique of traditional attempts to make robust explanatory use of those notions in a philosophical or scientific context. But Hume’s own philosophy is also structured around the attribution to human beings of a variety of basic faculties or mental powers – such as the reason and the imagination, or the various powers involved in Hume’s account of im- pressions of reflection and the (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
    Export citation  
  2. Identità narrativa e unità dell'io.Lorenzo Greco - 2019 - Notizie di Politeia 35 (135):34-43.
  3. Husserl’s Phenomenologization of Hume: Reflections on Husserl’s Method of Epoché.Stefanie Rocknak - 2001 - Philosophy Today 45 (5):28-36.
    This paper argues that Husserl’s method is partially driven by an attempt to avoid certain absurdities inherent in Hume’s epistemology. In this limited respect, we may say that Hume opened the door to phenomenology, but as a sacrificial lamb. However, Hume was well aware of his self-defeating position, and perhaps, in some respects, the need for an alternative. Moreover, Hume’s “mistakes” may have incited Husserl’s discovery of the epoche, and thus, transcendental phenomenology.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
    Export citation  
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  4. Self-Knowledge, Externalism, and Skepticism.Brian Mclaughlin & David Owens - 2000 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 74 (74):93-142.
    In recent years, some philosophers have claimed that we can know a priori that certain external world skeptical hypotheses are false on the basis of a priori knowledge that we are in certain kinds of mental states, and a priori knowledge that those mental states are individuated by contingent environmental factors. Appealing to a distinction between weak and strong a priority, I argue that weakly a priori arguments of this sort would beg the question of whether the skeptical hypothesis under (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (8 more)  
    Export citation  
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  5. Ockham, Descartes, and Hume. Self-Knowledge, Substance, and Causality. By Julius R. Weinberg. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press, 1977. 179 + x pages. $15.00. [REVIEW]Jerome V. Brown - 1979 - Dialogue 18 (1):118-122.
  6. Ockham, Descartes, & Hume. Self-knowledge, Substance, and Causality.J. D. North & Julius R. Weinberg - 1979 - Philosophical Quarterly 29 (117):358.
  7. Ockham, Descartes, and Hume: Self-Knowledge, Substance, and Causality. [REVIEW]Donald A. Cress - 1978 - International Studies in Philosophy 10:229-229.
  8. Ockham, Descartes, and Hume: self-knowledge, substance, and causality.Julius Rudolph Weinberg - 1977 - Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.