This category needs an editor. We encourage you to help if you are qualified.
Volunteer, or read more about what this involves.
Related categories

228 found
Order:
1 — 50 / 228
  1. Evolution, Intelligent Design and Public Education: A Comment on Thomas Nagel.Scott Aikin, Michael Harbour & Robert Talisse - 2010 - Spontaneous Generations 3 (1):35-40.
    Thomas Nagel recently proposed that the exclusion of Intelligent Design from science classrooms is inappropriate and that there needs to be room for “noncommittal discussion.” It is shown that Nagel’s policy proposals do not ?t the conclusions of his arguments.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2. There is No Place for Intelligent Design in the Philosophy of Biology : Intelligent Design is Not Science.Francisco J. Ayala - 2010 - In Francisco José Ayala & Robert Arp (eds.), Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Biology. Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 364--390.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3. Sober on Intelligent Design Theory and the Intelligent Designer.John Beaudoin - 2008 - Faith and Philosophy 25 (4):432-442.
    Intelligent design theorists claim that their theory is neutral as to the identity of the intelligent designer, even with respect to whether it is a natural or a supernatural agent. In a recent issue of Faith and Philosophy, Elliott Sober has argued that in fact the theory is not neutral on this issue, and that it entails theexistence of a supernatural designer. I examine Sober’s argument and identify several hurdles it must overcome.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  4. Or We Can Be Philosophers: A Response to Barbara Forrest.Francis J. Beckwith - 2015 - Synthese 192 (S1):1-23.
    This article is a response to Barbara Forrest’ 2011 Synthese article, “On the Non-Epistemology of Intelligent Design.” Forrest offers an account of my philosophical work that consists almost entirely of personal attacks, excursions into my religious pilgrimage, and misunderstandings and misrepresentations of my work as well as of certain philosophical issues. Not surprisingly, the Synthese editors include a disclaimer in the front matter of the special issue in which Forrest’s article was published. In my response, I address three topics: (1) (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5. Evidence for Intelligent Design From Biochemistry.Michael Behe - 2005 - Think 4 (11):27-40.
    Michael Behe makes a case for intelligent design.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6. The Modern Intelligent Design Hypothesis Breaking Rules.Michael Behe - 2003 - In Neil A. Manson (ed.), Philosophia Christi. Routledge. pp. 277.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  7. The Modern Intelligent Design Hypothesis : Breaking Rules.Michael Behe - 2003 - In Neil A. Manson (ed.), Philosophia Christi. Routledge. pp. 65-180.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  8. Nature's Destiny By Michael J. Denton.Michael J. Behe - 1999 - Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 43 (1):151-153.
  9. Intelligent Design is Not Science.Ophelia Benson - 2006 - The Philosophers' Magazine 34:11-13.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10. Simulation of Biological Evolution Under Attack, but Not Really: A Response to Meester.Stefaan Blancke, Maarten Boudry & Johan Braeckman - 2011 - Biology and Philosophy 26 (1):113-118.
    The leading Intelligent Design theorist William Dembski (Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham MD, 2002) argued that the first No Free Lunch theorem, first formulated by Wolpert and Macready (IEEE Trans Evol Comput 1: 67–82, 1997), renders Darwinian evolution impossible. In response, Dembski’s critics pointed out that the theorem is irrelevant to biological evolution. Meester (Biol Phil 24: 461–472, 2009) agrees with this conclusion, but still thinks that the theorem does apply to simulations of evolutionary processes. According to Meester, the theorem shows (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11. How Not to Attack Intelligent Design Creationism: Philosophical Misconceptions About Methodological Naturalism. [REVIEW]Maarten Boudry, Stefaan Blancke & Johan Braeckman - 2010 - Foundations of Science 15 (3):227-244.
    In recent controversies about Intelligent Design Creationism (IDC), the principle of methodological naturalism (MN) has played an important role. In this paper, an often neglected distinction is made between two different conceptions of MN, each with its respective rationale and with a different view on the proper role of MN in science. According to one popular conception, MN is a self-imposed or intrinsic limitation of science, which means that science is simply not equipped to deal with claims of the supernatural (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   7 citations  
  12. Intelligent Design or Natural Design.Raymond Bradley - unknown
    It began in 1945 when I was a 14 year old at Mt Albert Grammar. Our Fourth Form English teacher decided we should learn the skills of debating. The topic chosen was "Creation versus Evolution". And I, as an ardent young Baptist, volunteered, along with a Seventh Day Adventist, to take up the cudgels on behalf of Creation.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13. Intelligent Design and the Nature of Science: Philosophical and Pedagogical Points.Ingo Brigandt - 2013 - In Kostas Kampourakis (ed.), The Philosophy of Biology: A Companion for Educators. Dordrecht: Springer. pp. 205-238.
    This chapter offers a critique of intelligent design arguments against evolution and a philosophical discussion of the nature of science, drawing several lessons for the teaching of evolution and for science education in general. I discuss why Behe’s irreducible complexity argument fails, and why his portrayal of organismal systems as machines is detrimental to biology education and any under-standing of how organismal evolution is possible. The idea that the evolution of complex organismal features is too unlikely to have occurred by (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  14. Critical Notice of Evidence and Evolution: The Logic Behind the Science by Elliott Sober, Cambridge University of Press, 2008.Ingo Brigandt - 2011 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 41 (1):159–186.
    This essay discusses Elliott Sober’s Evidence and Evolution: The Logic Behind the Science. Valuable to both philosophers and biologists, Sober analyzes the testing of different kinds of evolutionary hypotheses about natural selection or phylogenetic history, including a thorough critique of intelligent design. Not at least because of a discussion of different schools of hypothesis testing (Bayesianism, likelihoodism, and frequentism), with Sober favoring a pluralism where different inference methods are appropriate in different empirical contexts, the book has lessons for philosophy of (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (10 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15. Intelligent Thought: Science Versus the Intelligent Design Movement.John Brockman (ed.) - 2006 - Vintage.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  16. Testowalność teorii inteligentnego projektu.Piotr Bylica - 2003 - Filozofia Nauki 2.
    The article covers the problem of testability of intelligent design theory. The objection that intelligent design theory does not correspond to principle of methodological naturalism is discussed. I show that recognizing intelligent causes is commonly applied in science. I present the "specification-complexity" criterion, an attempt to generalize the criteria used to define the problem in particular sciences. This criterion - together with the concept of explanatory filter - is to guarantee the testability of intelligent design theory. The irreducible complexity criterion, (...)
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17. Lonergan, Evolutionary Science, and Intelligent Design.Patrick H. Byrne - 2007 - Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 63 (4):893 - 918.
    This article shows how Bernard Lonergan's philosophy of science can bring resolution to a recent controversy: the controversy that arises from Intelligent Design theorists' and proponents of neo-Darwinian evolution. Intelligent Design theories argue that the complex structures of living organisms cannot be adequately explained by neo-Darwinian theories, especially by its postulate of random variations. Hence, an "intelligent designer" must be postulated in order to fill out scientific explanations. This article finds fault with the Intelligent Design arguments, but proposes a different (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18. The Panda’s Black Box: Opening Up the Intelligent Design Controversy Edited by Nathaniel C. Comfort.W. Malcolm Byrnes - 2008 - The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 8 (2):385-387.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19. Intelligent Design: The Bridge Between Science & Theology.John Angus Campbell - unknown
    In the movie Contact, an astronomer played by Jodie Foster discovers a radio signal with a discernable pattern, a sequence representing prime numbers from 2 to 101. Because the pattern is too specifically arranged to be mere random space noise, the scientists infer from this data that an extraterrestrial intelligence has transmitted this signal on purpose.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20. Intelligent Design?Noam Chomsky - unknown
    To detractors, Intelligent Design is creationism — the literal interpretation of the Book of Genesis — in a thin guise, or simply vacuous, about as interesting as "I don’t understand," as has always been true in the sciences before understanding is reached. Accordingly, there cannot be a "debate.".
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21. Intelligent Design: Neither Scientific nor Religious.David Clarke - 2007 - Theoria 73 (2):148-171.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22. Pitfalls in the Intelligent Design Debate.Peter Coghlan - 2005 - Ethics Education 11 (2).
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23. Intelligent Design and Theodicy.Joseph Corabi - 2009 - Religious Studies 45 (1):21-35.
    This paper explores a seldom discussed difficulty for traditional theists who wish to embrace the purported evidence employed in biochemical intelligent design arguments, and who also employ a commonly used element in their theodicies – namely, the claim that God would have reason to make a relatively orderly and self-sufficient world with stable and simple natural laws. I begin by introducing intelligent design arguments and the varieties of theodicy at issue, then I argue that there is at least a strong (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24. Evolution and Intelligent Design. What is Science and What is Not.George V. Coyne - 2010 - Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 66 (4):717 - 720.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25. Intelligent Design: The Faith That Dare Not Speak its Name.Jerry A. Coyne - 2006 - In John Brockman (ed.), Intelligent Thought: Science Versus the Intelligent Design Movement. Vintage. pp. 272.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26. Review of William Dembski (Ed.), Michael Ruse (Ed.), Debating Design: From Darwin to DNA[REVIEW]Dan D. Crawford - 2005 - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2005 (3).
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27. Intelligent Design in Cultural Evolution.Lee Cronk - 2006 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (4):352-353.
    Intelligent design, though unnecessary in the study of biological evolution, is essential to the study of cultural evolution. However, the intelligent designers in question are not deities or aliens but rather humans going about their lives. The role of intentionality in cultural evolution can be elucidated through the addition of signaling theory to the framework outlined in the target article. (Published Online November 9 2006).
    Remove from this list   Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28. Exploring Mouse Trap History.Joachim L. Dagg - 2011 - Evolution Education and Outreach 4 (3):397-414.
    Since intelligent design (ID) advocates claimed the ubiquitous mouse trap as an example of systems that cannot have evolved, mouse trap history is doubly relevant to studying material culture. On the one hand, debunking ID claims about mouse traps and, by implication, also about other irreducibly complex systems has a high educational value. On the other hand, a case study of mouse trap history may contribute insights to the academic discussion about material culture evolution. Michael Behe argued that mouse traps (...)
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29. Debating Design: From Darwin to DNA - Edited by William A. Dembski and Michael Ruse.Kevin Davey - 2006 - Philosophical Books 47 (4):383-386.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30. What is Wrong with Intelligent Design?Gregory W. Dawes - 2007 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 61 (2):69 - 81.
    While a great deal of abuse has been directed at intelligent design theory (ID), its starting point is a fact about biological organisms that cries out for explanation, namely "specified complexity" (SC). Advocates of ID deploy three kind of argument from specified complexity to the existence of a designer: an eliminative argument, an inductive argument, and an inference to the best explanation. Only the first of these merits the abuse directed at it; the other two arguments are worthy of respect. (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  31. Paley's Ipod: The Cognitive Basis of the Design Argument Within Natural Theology.Helen de Cruz & Johan de Smedt - 2010 - Zygon 45 (3):665-684.
    The argument from design stands as one of the most intuitively compelling arguments for the existence of a divine Creator. Yet, for many scientists and philosophers, Hume's critique and Darwin's theory of natural selection have definitely undermined the idea that we can draw any analogy from design in artifacts to design in nature. Here, we examine empirical studies from developmental and experimental psychology to investigate the cognitive basis of the design argument. From this it becomes clear that humans spontaneously discern (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  32. Schenkerian Analysis and the Intelligent Listener.Mark DeBellis - 2003 - The Monist 86 (4):579-607.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33. DARWIN'S MELTDOWN -- Cover Story Http://Www.Worldmag.Com/World/Issue/04-03- 04/Home.Asp.William Dembski - unknown
    Cover story: WORLD ASKED FOUR leaders of the Intelligent Design Movement to have some fun: Imagine writing in 2025, on the 100th anniversary of the famous Scopes "monkey" trial, and explain how Darwinism has bit the dust, unable to rebut the evidence that what we see around us could not have arisen merely by time plus chance.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34. Is Intelligent Design a Form of Natural Theology?William Dembski - manuscript
    There are good and bad reasons to be skeptical of intelligent design. Perhaps the best reason is that intelligent design has yet to establish itself as a thriving scientific research program. Thus far philosophical, theoretical, and foundational concerns have tended to predominate. From the vantage of design advocates, this simply reflects the earliness of the hour and the need to clear the decks before a shift of paradigms can take place. Give us more time, and we'll deliver on the program. (...)
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35. Infinite Universe or Intelligent Design?William Dembski - manuscript
    To reach the conclusion that the universe is infinite, physicists (a) make some observations; (b) fit those observations to some mathematical model; (c) find that the neatest model that accommodates the data extrapolates to an infinite universe; (d) conclude that the universe is infinite. In my presentation I will examine the logic by which physicists reach this conclusion. Specifically, I will show that there is no way to empirically justify the move from (b) to (c). An infinite universe should therefore (...)
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  36. The Design Revolution: Answering the Toughest Questions About Intelligent Design.William Dembski - manuscript
    Mainstream modern science, with its analytical methods and its “objective” teachings, is the dominant force in modern culture. If science simply discovered and taught the truth about reality, who could object? But mainstream science does not simply “discover the truth”; instead it relies in part on a set of unscientific, false philosophical presuppositions as the basis for many of its conclusions. Thus, crucial aspects of what modern science teaches us are simply shabby philosophy dressed up in a white lab coat.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   8 citations  
  37. Gauging Intelligent Design's Success.William Dembski - manuscript
    Proponents of intelligent design have been remarkably successful, at least in the United States, in creating a cultural movement. They have also been remarkably successful at exasperating a scientific and intellectual world that dismisses intelligent design as the latest incarnation of creationism—more sophisticated than previous incarnations to be sure, but with many of the old faults. In this paper I want to focus on intelligent design’s merits as an intellectual project. I will show that the questions it raises are legitimate (...)
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38. March 21, 2002: For Immediate Release.William Dembski - manuscript
    In today's Washington Times (http://www.washingtontimes.com/op-ed/20020321-76780268.htm#2), Sen. Edward Kennedy takes exception to Sen. Rick Santorum's March 14 Commentary piece, "Illiberal Education in Ohio Schools" (http://asp.washtimes.com/printarticle.asp?action=print&ArticleID=20020314-50858765). Santorum, who supports intelligent design, argues that Ohio public schools should be open to teaching it. Kennedy, who has publicly supported the teaching of alternate scientific theories when there is diversity of opinion among scientists, nevertheless rejects Santorum's argument. Yes, alternate scientific theories should be taught. But, as Kennedy puts it, "intelligent design is not a genuine (...)
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39. Hume, Reid, and Signs of Intelligence.William Dembski - manuscript
    David Hume’s critique of intelligent design is vastly overrated. Nevertheless, his critique, especially at the hands of his contemporary disciples, has been highly effective at shutting down discussion about design. I want here to review Hume’s critique, indicate how modern disciples have updated it, and then describe the response to Hume by his contemporary Thomas Reid. That response in my view is decisive. Would that more philosophers studied it. Hume did not demolish design. Reid demolished Hume.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40. Biology in the Subjunctive Mood: A Response to Nicholas Matzke.William Dembski - manuscript
    On October 11, 2003, the Talk Reason website posted an article by Nicholas Matzke titled "Evolution in (Brownian) Space: A Model for the Origin of the Bacterial Flagellum" (http://www.talkreason.org/articles/flagellum.cfm). Talk Reason advertises itself as a website that presents a collection of articles which aim to defend genuine science from numerous attempts by the new crop of creationists to replace it with theistic pseudo-science under various disguises and names." The most obvious target here is intelligent design. Indeed, Matzke's article attempts to (...)
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41. Intelligent Design.William Dembski - manuscript
    Intelligent design begins with a seemingly innocuous question: Can objects, even if nothing is known about how they arose, exhibit features that reliably signal the action of an intelligent cause? To see what’s at stake, consider Mount Rushmore. The evidence for Mount Rushmore’s design is direct—eyewitnesses saw the sculptor Gutzon Borglum spend the better part of his life designing and building this structure. But what if there were no direct evidence for Mount Rushmore’s design? What if humans went extinct and (...)
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  42. Intelligent Design and the Problem of Evil.William Dembski - manuscript
    Intelligent design—the idea that a designing intelligence plays a substantive and empirically significant role in the natural world—no longer sits easily in our intellectual environment. Science rejects it for invoking an unnecessary teleology. Philosophy rejects it for committing an argument from ignorance. And theology rejects it for, as Edward Oakes contends, making the task of theodicy impossible.1 I want in this lecture to address all these concerns but especially the last. For many thinkers, particularly religious believers, intelligent design exacerbates the (...)
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43. Can Functional Logic Take the Place of Intelligent Design? A Response to Walter Thorson.William Dembski - manuscript
    Walter Thorson's two articles on the legitimacy and scope of naturalism within science attempt to identify a mediating position between the reductive naturalism of thinkers like Richard Dawkins and the complete rejection of naturalism by thinkers like Phillip Johnson. Thorson rightly notes that the purely mechanistic approach to science characteristic of reductive naturalism is inadequate. Nonetheless, he argues that science still needs naturalism as a methodological or regulative principle. Thorson's methodological naturalism leaves room for teleology in nature, though a teleology (...)
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44. The Logical Underpinnings of Intelligent Design.William Dembski - manuscript
    For many natural scientists, design, conceived as the action of an intelligent agent, is not a fundamental creative force in nature. Rather, material mechanisms, characterized by chance and necessity and ruled by unbroken laws, are thought sufficient to do all nature’s creating. Darwin’s theory epitomizes this rejection of design.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  45. Ten Questions to Ask Your Biology Teacher About Design.William Dembski - manuscript
    Professor Will Provine teaches a course for incoming freshman at Cornell University. In it, he contends that Darwin’s theory of evolution removes all rational basis for believing in the existence of a benevolent God, much less the God of Christianity. For Provine, “evolution is the greatest engine of atheism ever invented,” As evidence for this claim, he need look no further than the success of his course at producing new atheists.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46. Intelligent Design Coming Clean.William Dembski - manuscript
    In the movie Dream Team starring Michael Keaton, Keaton plays a psychiatric patient who must feign sanity to save his psychiatrist from being murdered. In protesting his sanity, Keaton informs two New York City policemen that he doesn’t wear women’s clothing, that he’s never danced around Times Square naked, and that he doesn’t talk to Elvis. The two police officers are much relieved. Likewise, I hope with this essay to reassure our culture’s guardians of scientific correctness that they have nothing (...)
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47. Commentary on Eugenie Scott and Glenn Branch's "Guest Viewpoint: 'Intelligent Design' Not Accepted by Most Scientists," 7/2/02. [REVIEW]William Dembski - manuscript
    The National School Boards Association enlisted Eugenie Scott and Glenn Branch to criticize intelligent design bullet point fashion. Here I want to respond to these bullet-point assertions. I would repeat the entire article, but copyright restrictions prevent me. The article is available at http://nsba.org/sbn/02-jul/070202-8.htm.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48. Paul Gross's Dilemma: An Open Letter to the National Association of Scholars in Response to Paul Gross's Article on Intelligent Design in the Nas's September 2003 Issue of Science Insights.William Dembski - manuscript
    I have before me a letter dated January 5, 2000 from Bradford Wilson, the executive director of the NAS. It begins, “I really enjoyed your contribution to the recent symposium in the January issue of First Things, so much so that I’ve also decided to invite you to join the NAS. Many of your fellow contributors including Robert George, Jeffrey Satinover, and Father Neuhaus are among our current members, and I think you’d find it well worth your while if you (...)
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49. Unintelligent Evolution.William Dembski - manuscript
    According to evolutionist Francisco Ayala, Darwin’s greatest achievement was to show that the organized complexity of living things could be brought about without recourse to a designing intelligence. Given this view of Darwin’s achievement, what evolutionary biology has come to mean by “evolution” is an unintelligent or blind form of it. This was brought home to me two years ago at a debate in which I participated. I was invited, along with my colleague and friend Michael Behe, to debate Darwinists (...)
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50. Intelligent Design is Not Optimal Design.William Dembski - manuscript
    I was recently on an NPR program with skeptic Michael Shermer and paleontologist Donald Prothero to discuss intelligent design. As the discussion unfolded, it became clear that they were using the phrase "intelligent design" in a way quite different from how the emerging intelligent design community is using it.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 228