This category needs an editor. We encourage you to help if you are qualified.
Volunteer, or read more about what this involves.
Related categories

18 found
Order:
  1. added 2019-06-07
    Le Commentaire de Jean Philopon Sur le Troisième Livre du ‘Traité de l'Ame’ d'Aristote. [REVIEW]D. J. Allan - 1935 - The Classical Review 49 (4):153-154.
  2. added 2018-07-21
    S. Broadie Philoponus: On Aristotle Physics 4.10–14. With an Introduction by Richard Sorabji. Pp. Xiv + 128. London: Bristol Classical Press, 2011. Cased, £60. ISBN: 978-0-7156-4088-3. [REVIEW]M. J. Edwards - 2013 - The Classical Review 63 (1):293-293.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  3. added 2017-11-22
    A Crítica de Filopono de Alexandria à Tese Aristotélica da Eternidade do Mundo.Fátima Regina Rodrigues Évora - 2003 - Analytica 7 (1):15-47.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  4. added 2017-08-30
    Plato and Aristotle in Agreement: The Neoplatonist Commentaries on Aristotle's "Categories".Thomas James Bole - 1993 - Dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin
    The dissertation is a case study of the thesis of the Neoplatonist commentators that Aristotle's philosophy was in basic harmony with Plato's. The cases examined are the surviving Greek commentaries on Aristotle's Categories authored by Porphyry, Dexippus, Ammonius, Simplicius, Philoponus, Olympiodorus, and David. The Categories was the traditional introduction to a systematic reading of Aristotle's works; it is also blatantly anti-Platonist: if it could be shown to be harmonious with Plato's philosophy, Aristotle's other works could more easily be accommodated. ;The (...)
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  5. added 2017-01-23
    Body and Soul in Philoponus.H. J. Blumenthal - 1986 - The Monist 69 (3):370-382.
    For a true Platonist the nature of the soul is, in a sense, unproblematic. So too is its status. It is an immaterial entity, with all the attributes that that entails, and it is independent of any body with which it might, from time to time, be associated. And yet this extreme dualism must be modified in some way or other, if any account is to be given of the life and activities of a man, or any other living thing, (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  6. added 2016-11-27
    The Problem of Title of the «Posterior Analytics», and Thoughts From Commentators.Owen Goldin - 2009 - Documenti E Studi Sulla Tradizione Filosofica Medievale 20:127-147.
    The Prior and Posterior Analytics were entitled Ta Analutika by Aristotle himself. But it is not at all clear what Aristotle had in mind in grouping these two works together and in giving them this common title. This question was discussed at length by the ancient Greek commentators on Aristotle. Two main possibilities emerged. The first is that taken by Alexander of Aphrodisias, Ammonius, and Philoponus in his commentary on APr. According to this line of thought, Aristotle has in mind (...)
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  7. added 2016-05-03
    A New Manuscript of Pseudo-Philoponus' Commentary on Aristotle's Metaphysics Containing a Hitherto Unknown Ascription of the Work.Stefan Alexandru - 1999 - Phronesis 44 (4):347-352.
  8. added 2015-08-17
    Philoponus, On Aristotle's Physics 5-8, with Simplicius, On Aristotle on the Void. [REVIEW]Lee Pearcy - 1994 - The Medieval Review 10.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  9. added 2015-06-02
    'It Makes No Difference': Optics and Natural Philosophy in Late Antiquity.Sylvia Berryman - 2012 - Apeiron 45 (3):201-220.
  10. added 2014-10-24
    Philoponus and the Rejection of Aristotelian Science.Thomas J. Bole - 1988 - Review of Metaphysics 41 (3):635-637.
    These papers, arising from a 1983 conference on one of the last and most acute Neoplatonist commentators on Aristotle, a Christian later condemned for his monophysitism and tritheism, focus on the arguments in which he objects to tenets of Aristotle's philosophy of nature, notably on the eternity of the world and the natures of place and projectile motion.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  11. added 2014-08-20
    On Aristotle's Physics 1.4-6.John Philoponus & Catherine Osborne - 2009 - Duckworth.
    Aristotle's Physics 1.4-9 explores a range of questions about the basic structure of reality, the nature of prime matter, the principles of change, the relation between form and matter, and the issue of whether things can come into being out of nothing, and if so, in what sense that is true. Philoponus' commentaries do not merely report and explain Aristotle and the other thinkers whom Aristotle is discussing. They are also the philosophical work of an independent thinker in the Neoplatonic (...)
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  12. added 2014-08-20
    On Aristotle's "Physics 1.1-3".John Philoponus & Catherine Osborne - 2006 - Cornell University Press.
  13. added 2014-06-02
    Psychic Disharmony: Philoponus and Epicurus on Plato's Phaedo.James Warren - 2006 - Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 30:235-259.
  14. added 2014-04-17
    Positioning Heaven: The Infidelity of a Faithful Aristotelian.Jon McGinnis - 2006 - Phronesis 51 (2):140-161.
    Aristotle's account of place in terms of an innermost limit of a containing body was to generate serious discussion and controvery among Aristotle's later commentators, especially when it was applied to the cosmos as a whole. The problem was that since there is nothing outside of the cosmos that could contain it, the cosmos apparently could not have a place according to Aristotle's definition; however, if the cosmos does not have a place, then it is not clear that it could (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  15. added 2014-04-17
    Interpreting Aristotle on Mixture: Problems About Elemental Composition From Philoponus to Cooper.Michael Weisberg - 2004 - Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 35 (4):681–706.
    Aristotle’s On generation and corruption raises a vital question: how is mixture, or what we would now call chemical combination, possible? It also offers an outline of a solution to the problem and a set of criteria that a successful solution must meet. Understanding Aristotle’s solution and developing a viable peripatetic theory of chemical combination has been a source of controversy over the last two millennia. We describe seven criteria a peripatetic theory of mixture must satisfy: uniformity, recoverability, potentiality, equilibrium, (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  16. added 2013-09-11
    Philoponus on Theophrastus on Composition in Nature.F. A. J. Haades - unknown
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  17. added 2013-08-30
    On Aristotle on the Intellect (De Anima 3.4-8).John Philoponus - 1991 - Cornell University Press.
  18. added 2013-08-30
    Commentaire Sur le de Anima d'Aristote, Traduction de Guillaume de Moerbeke.John Philoponus - 1966 - Editions Beatrice-Nauwelaerts.