This category needs an editor. We encourage you to help if you are qualified.
Volunteer, or read more about what this involves.
Related categories
Siblings:
1292 found
Search inside:
(import / add options)   Order:
1 — 50 / 1292
  1. A. (1899). Comte Et Stuart Mill d'Apres Leur Correspondence. Philosophical Review 8:436.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2. Ruth Abbey (1997). Odd Bedfellows: Nietzsche and Mill on Marriage. History of European Ideas 23 (2-4):81-104.
    This paper examines Nietzsche's views on love and marriage in the works of his middle period. Contrary to the general consensus in the secondary literature regarding Nietzsche's ideas on these matters, it shows that he offers several positive reflections on love and marriage. Indeed, at times he accepts that friendship is possible between the genders and even models marriage on friendship. Modelling marriage on friendship creates an overlap between Nietzsche's thought and that of John Stuart Mill and Harriet Taylor. However, (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  3. James Adams (1992). Philosophical Forgetfulness: John Stuart Mill's "Nature". Journal of the History of Ideas 53 (3):437-454.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4. Gerhard Adler, Michael Fordham & Sir Herbert Read (eds.) (1973). Collected Works of C.G. Jung: The First Complete English Edition of the Works of C.G. Jung. Routledge.
    Contains revised versions of works previously published, works not previously translated, and new translations of virtually all of Jung's writings. Prior to his death he supervised the textual revision. Several of the volumes are extensively illustrated; each contains an index and most a bibliography.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5. E. J. Aiton (1986). Complete Works. Volume III: Minor WorksNicholas Copernicus Pawel Czartoryski Edward Rosen Erna Hilfstein. Isis 77 (4):714-715.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6. E. J. Aiton (1971). Seventeenth Century The Mathematical and Philosophical Works of the Right Rev. John Wilkins. London: F. Cass. 1970. Two Volumes Bound as One: Vol. I, Pp. Xii + 261; Vol. II, Pp. Xvi + 265, Figs., Index. £7.35. [REVIEW] British Journal for the History of Science 5 (3):308.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7. Ernest Albee & Charles Douglas (1899). The Ethics of John Stuart Mill. Philosophical Review 8 (4):411.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8. Edward Alexander (ed.) (1999). On Liberty. Broadview Press.
    Mill predicted that “[t]he Liberty is likely to survive longer than anything else that I have written … because the conjunction of [Harriet Taylor’s] mind with mine has rendered it a kind of philosophic text-book of a single truth, which the changes progressively taking place in modern society tend to bring out in ever greater relief.” Indeed, _On Liberty_ is one of the most influential books ever written, and remains a foundational document for the understanding of vital political, philosophical and (...)
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  9. Edward Alexander (1965). Matthew Arnold and John Stuart Mill. Routledge & Kegan Paul.
    This study defines the relationship between humanism and liberalism by comparing the two Victorian figures who were most concerned with the preservation of humanistic values in a free and democratic society: Matthew Arnold and John Stuart Mill. The book sets apart Arnold and Mill from their contemporaries and points out their similarities to one another in discussions of their theories of history, poetry, their celebration of the contemplative life and their willingness to welcome democracy. At the same time it examines (...)
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10. Patrick Proctor Alexander (1990). Mill and Carlyle an Examination of Mr John Stuart Mill's Doctrine of Causation in Relation to Moral Freedom.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11. Patrick Proctor Alexander (1866). Mill and Carlyle: An Examination of Mr. John Stuart Mill's Doctrine of Causation in Relation to Moral Freedom Wth an Occasional Discourse on Sauerteig by Smelfungus. R. West.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12. Patrick Proctor Alexander (1866). Mill and Carlyle: An Examination of Mr. John Stuart Mill's Doctrine of Causation in Relation to Moral Freedom with an Occasional Discourse on Sauerteig by Smelfungus [I.E. P. P. Alexander]. [REVIEW] Norwood Editions.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13. Patrick Proctor Alexander & John Stuart Mill (1868). Moral Causation; or, Notes on Mr. Mill's Notes to the Chapter on 'Freedom' in the Third Ed. Of His Examination of Sir W. Hamilton's Philosophy. [REVIEW]
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14. Necip Fikri Alican (1994). A Defense of John Stuart Mill's Proof of the Principle of Utility. Dissertation, Washington University
    In my dissertation, I analyze, interpret, and defend John Stuart Mill's proof of the principle of utility in the fourth chapter of his Utilitarianism. My purpose is not to glorify utilitarianism, in a full sweep, as the best normative ethical theory, or even to vindicate, on a more specific level, Mill's universalistic ethical hedonism as the best form of utilitarianism. I am concerned only with Mill's utilitarianism, and primarily with his proof of the principle of utility. ;My overarching purpose guiding (...)
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15. S. Ambirajan (1992). John Stuart Mill, Writings on India, Ed. John M. Robson, Martin Moir, and Zawahir Moir , Toronto, University of Toronto Press, 1990, Pp. Lviv + 336. [REVIEW] Utilitas 4 (1):154.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16. Brian A. Anderson (1982). John Stuart Mill, Self-Culture, and the Critique of Benthamism.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17. Elizabeth S. Anderson (1991). John Stuart Mill and Experiments in Living. Ethics 102 (1):4-26.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   7 citations  
  18. Elizabeth S. Anderson, F. R. Berger, David O. Brink, D. G. Brown, Amy Gutmann, Peter Railton, J. O. Urmson & Henry R. West (1997). Mill's Utilitarianism: Critical Essays. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
    John Stuart Mill's Utilitarianism continues to serve as a rich source of moral and theoretical insight. This collection of articles by top scholars offers fresh interpretations of Mill's ideas about happiness, moral obligation, justice, and rights. Applying contemporary philosophical insights, the articles challenge the conventional readings of Mill, and, in the process, contribute to a deeper understanding of utilitarian theory as well as the complexity of moral life.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19. Susan Leigh Anderson (2006). Mill on God: The Pervasiveness and Elusiveness of Mill's Religious Thought - By Alan P.F. Sell. Philosophical Books 47 (4):359-360.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20. Susan Leigh Anderson (2006). Mill's Life. In Henry West (ed.), The Blackwell Guide to Mill's Utilitarianism. Wiley-Blackwell.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21. Susan Leigh Anderson & Gerald J. Postema (2006). Part I The Background of Mill's Utilitarianism. In Henry West (ed.), The Blackwell Guide to Mill's Utilitarianism. Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 9.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22. Pietro Di Angelo Cea Anfossi (2011). Relación felicidad-conciencia en John Stuart mill Y Peter Singer a patir de la ética utilitarista. Theoria 20 (2):13-19.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23. Tom P. S. Angier (ed.) (2012). Ethics: The Key Thinkers. Continuum.
    Plato Tom Angier -- Aristotle Timothy Chappell -- Stoics Jacob Klein -- Aquinas Vivian Boland O.P -- Hume Peter Millican -- Kant Ralph Walker -- Hegel Kenneth Westphal -- Marx Sean Sayers -- Mill Krister Bykvist -- Nietzsche Ken Gemes and Christoph Schuringa -- Macintyre David Solomon.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24. José García Añón (1997). John Stuart Mill Justicia y Derecho.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25. R. P. Anschutz (1953). The Philosophy of J.S. Mill. Greenwood Press.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  26. R. P. Anschutz (1949). The Logic of J. S. Mill. Mind 58 (231):277-305.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  27. Willi Apel (1955). John Dunstable: Complete WorksManfred F. Bukofzer. Speculum 30 (3):463-465.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28. Lorraine Marie Arangno (2013). Pleasure: 'The Choice of Hercules'. The European Legacy 18 (2):197-208.
    In this article I contend that John Stuart Mill's Utilitarianism has been widely misunderstood, and hence the importance of his philosophical project has been diminished. This misunderstanding arises primarily from misconceptions regarding Mill's definition of pleasure. However, these misconceptions may be successfully resolved by reflecting on Mill's educational roots and his commitment to Greco-Roman philosophy. In particular, I hold that a deeper understanding of Mill's philosophical progenitors (i.e., Aristotle and Epicurus) would lead us to conclude that for Mill the 'pleasures' (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29. Richard Arneson (1985). Book Review:Happiness, Justice and Freedom: The Moral and Political Philosophy of John Stuart Mill. Fred R. Berger; Paternalism. John Kleinig. [REVIEW] Ethics 95 (4):954-.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30. Richard J. Arneson (1985). Book Review:John Stuart Mill and the Pursuit of Virtue. Bernard Semmel. [REVIEW] Ethics 95 (3):757-.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31. Richard J. Arneson (1984). John Stuart Mill and the Pursuit of Virtue.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32. Richard J. Arneson (1982). Democracy and Liberty in Mill's Theory of Government. Journal of the History of Philosophy 20 (1):43-64.
  33. Richard Ashcraft (1994). Bruce L. Kinzer, Ann P. Robson and John M. Robson, A Moralist In and Out of Parliament: John Stuart Mill at Westminster, 1865–1868, Toronto, University of Toronto Press, 1992. Pp. Viii + 317. [REVIEW] Utilitas 6 (1):140.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34. Richard Ashcraft (1989). Class Conflict and Constitutionalism in JS Mill's Thought. In Nancy L. Rosenblum (ed.), Liberalism and the Moral Life. pp. 105--26.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  35. R. F. Atkinson (1957). J. S. Mill's “Proof” Of The Principle Of Utility: PHILOSOPHY. Philosophy 32 (121):158-167.
    In Chapter 4 of his essay Utilitarianism , “Of what sort of Proof the Principle of Utility is susceptible,” J. S. Mill undertakes to prove , in some sense of that term, the principle of utility. It has very commonly been argued that in the course of this “proof” Mill commits two very obvious fallacies. The first is the naturalistic fallacy which he is held to commit when he argues that since “the only proof capable of being given that an (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  36. R. F. Atkinson (1957). J. S. Mill's "Proof" of the Principle of Utility. Philosophy 32 (121):158 - 167.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37. Eugene R. August (1976). John Stuart Mill: A Mind at Large. Vision Press.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  38. Frederick Temple Blackwood Dufferin and Ava (1868). Mr. Mill's Plan for the Pacification of Ireland Examined. John Murray.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39. Golam Azam (2005). Mill's Utilitarianism: Exposition and Evaluation. Philosophy and Progress 37:137.
    The objective of the paper is to critically explicate the views of JS Mill in his "Utilitarianism" in regards to his efforts to clarify the concept of utilitarianism. In the first part of the paper it examined how successful was Mill in clarifying the idea of utilitarianism. In the second part of the paper, a critical discussion is presented to justify the applicability of his theory in dealing with contemporary moral dilemmas.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40. R. J. B. (1969). Mill. Review of Metaphysics 22 (4):772-772.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41. Jovan Babić (2006). Postupci koji se tiču nas samih / postupci koji se tiču ostalih: neka zapažanja. Prolegomena 5 (2):193-207.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42. Jovan Babic (2006). Self-Regarding / Other-Regarding Acts: Some Remarks. Prolegomena 5 (2):193-207.
    In his essay On Liberty, John Stuart Mill presents the famous harm principle in the following manner: “[…] the sole end for which mankind are warranted, individually or collectively, in interfering with the liberty of action of any of their number, is self-protection. […] The only part of the conduct of anyone, for which he is amenable to society, is that which concerns others. […] Over himself, over his own body and mind, the individual is sovereign.” Hence, there is a (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  43. Jovan Babic (2006). Self-Regarding / Other-Regarding Acts: Some Remarks: Postupci Koji Se Tiču Nas Samih / Postupci Koji Se Tiču Ostalih: Neka Zapažanja. Prolegomena 5 (2):193-207.
    U svome spisu O slobodi, John Stuart Mill predstavlja svoje poznato načelo nenanošenja štete na sljedeći način: “… samozaštita [je] jedina svrha zbog koje se čovječanstvo, pojedinačno ili kolektivno, ima pravo miješati u slobodu djelovanja svakog od svojih članova. […] On je odgovoran društvu samo za ono svoje ponašanje koje se tiče ostalih. […] Pojedinac je neograničeni gospodar nad samim sobom, nad svojim tijelom i dušom.” Dakle, postoji razlika između postupaka koji se tiču nas samih i postupaka koji se tiču (...)
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44. Julian Baggini (1998). Move Over Mill and Bentham. The Philosophers' Magazine 3:52-52.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45. Andrew R. Bailey (ed.) (2016). Utilitarianism - Ed. Andrew Bailey. Broadview Press.
    _Utilitarianism_ is a classic work of ethical theory, arguably the most persuasive and comprehensible presentation of this widely influential position. Mill argues that it is pleasure and pain that ought to guide our decision-making&and not the pleasure and pain of any one person or group, but the summative experience of all who are affected by our actions. While he didn’t invent utilitarianism, Mill offered its clearest expression and strongest defense, and expanded the theory to account for the variety in quality (...)
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46. A. Bain (1880). John Stuart Mill. Mind 5 (17):82-104.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47. A. Bain (1880). John Stuart Mill, IV. Mind 5:82.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48. A. Bain (1880). 5.--John Stuart Mill. Mind 17:82-104.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49. A. Bain (1879). V.—John Stuart Mill. Mind 16:520-541.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50. A. Bain (1879). John Stuart Mill. Mind 4 (14):211-229.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 1292