Bookmark and Share

Jürgen Habermas

Edited by Chad Kautzer (University of Colorado at Denver)
Related categories
Siblings:
1349 found
Search inside:
(import / add options)   Order:
1 — 50 / 1349
  1. Abad I. Ninet Antoni & Molas Josep Monserrat (2009). Habermas and Ackerman: A Synthesis Applied to the Legitimation and Codification of Legal Norms. Ratio Juris 22 (4):510-531.
    In this article we consider certain elements of the normative theory of Jürgen Habermas in the light of the proposals of Bruce Ackerman, with a view to strengthening a concept of deliberative democracy applied to the legitimation of juridical rules. We do not construct a hierarchy of the two positions, but seek to bring together certain elements to achieve a common project. As the starting point for examining the work of the two authors, we take the scheme proposed by Habermas (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2. L. M. Abbott (forthcoming). The Conceptual Public Sphere and its Problems: Habermas, Political Action and the Arab States. Journal of International Political Theory.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3. Farid Abdel-Nour (2004). Farewell to Justification: Habermas, Human Rights, and Universalist Morality. Philosophy and Social Criticism 30 (1):73-96.
    In his recent work, Jürgen Habermas signals the abandonment of his earlier claims to justify human rights and universalist morality. This paper explains the above shift, arguing that it is the inescapable result of his attempts in recent years to accommodate pluralism. The paper demonstrates how Habermas’s universal pragmatic justification of modern normative standards was inextricably tied to his consensus theory of validity. He was compelled by the structure of that argument to count on the current or future availability of (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  4. Arash Abizadeh (2007). On the Philosophy/Rhetoric Binaries: Or, is Habermasian Discourse Motivationally Impotent? Philosophy and Social Criticism 33 (4):445-472.
    The susceptibility of Habermas' socio-political theory to the charge of motivational impotence can be traced to a problem in the way in which he conceives of discursive practical reason. By implicitly constructing the notion of discursive rationality in contrast to, and in abstraction from, the rhetorical and affective components of language use, Habermas' notion of discursive practical reason ends up reiterating the same binaries — between reason and passion, abstract and concrete, universal and particular — that provide the tacit parameters (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  5. Arash Abizadeh (2005). In Defence of the Universalization Principle in Discourse Ethics. Philosophical Forum 36 (2):193–211.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (11 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  6. Mitchell Aboulafia, Myra Orbach Bookman & Cathy Kemp (eds.) (2002). Habermas and Pragmatism. Routledge.
    Jürgen Habermas is one of the most important thinkers of this century. His work has been highly influential not only in philosophy, but particularly in the fields of politics, sociology and law. This is the first collection that explores the connections between his body of work and North America's biggest philosophical movement, pragmatism. Habermas and Pragmatism investigates the influences of pragmatism on Habermas' thought in a collection of stellar essays with contributions by Habermas himself, leading representatives of pragmatism, as well (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7. Carlo Invernizzi Accetti (2010). Can Democracy Emancipate Itself From Political Theology? Habermas and Lefort on the Permanence of the Theologico-Political. Constellations 17 (2):254-270.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8. N. Adams (2003). Review Articles : Recent Books in English by Jurgen Habermas: On the Pragmatics of Communication, Edited by Maeve Cooke. Cambridge: Polity, 1998. 454 Pp. Pb. ISBN 0-74563-047-2. The Inclusion of the Other: Studies in Political Theory, Edited by C. Cronin and P. De Grieff. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1998. 300 Pp. Pb. ISBN 0-26258-186-8. The Postnational Constellation: Political Essays, Trans. And Edited by M. Pensky. Cambridge: Polity, 2001. 190 Pp. Pb. ISBN 0-74562- 352-2. The Liberating Power of Symbols: Philosophical Essays, Trans. P. Dews. Cambridge: Polity, 2001. 130 Pp. Pb. ISBN 0-74562-552-5. Religion and Rationality: Essays on Reason, God, and Modernity, Edited by E. Mendieta. Cambridge: Polity, 2002.176 Pp. Pb. ISBN 0-74562- 487-. [REVIEW] Studies in Christian Ethics 16 (1):72-79.
  9. Nicholas Adams (2006). Habermas and Theology. Cambridge University Press.
    How can the world's religious traditions debate within the public sphere? In this book Nicholas Adams shows the importance of Habermas' approaches to this question. The full range of Habermas' work is considered, with detailed commentary on the more difficult texts. Adams energetically rebuts some of Habermas' arguments, particularly those which postulate the irrationality or stability of religious thought. Members of different religious traditions need to understand their own ethical positions as part of a process of development involving ongoing disagreements, (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10. Ben Agger (1979). Work and Authority in Marcuse and Habermas. Human Studies 2 (1):191 - 208.
    I have argued that Marcuse's notions of the merger of work and play and of the possibility of nondominating organizational rationality and authority fly in the face of the mainstream Weberian tradition which venerates the labor-leisure dualism and the bureaucratic coordination of labor. I have further argued that this Weberian current is reappropriated by Jürgen Habermas in his own recent work on the epistemological foundations of social science. The counterpoint between Marcuse and Habermas reveals a split within modern critical theory. (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11. J. Aguirre (2013). Habermas' Account of the Role of Religion in the Public Sphere A Response to Cristina Lafont's Critiques Through an Illustrative Political Debate About Same-Sex Marriage. Philosophy and Social Criticism 39 (7):637-673.
    This article is meant as a response to Cristina Lafont’s critiques of Habermas’ view of religion’s role in the public sphere. For Lafont, the burdens that Habermas places on secular citizens, by requiring them to avoid secularism, may entail dangerous consequences for a correct understanding of the concept of deliberative democracy. For this reason, she presents a proposal of her own in which no citizen, whether religious or secular, has the obligation to engage in a way of thinking alien to (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12. Javier Aguirre (2012). Jürgen Habermas and Religion in the Public Sphere. Ideas Y Valores 61 (148):59-78.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13. Javier Aguirre (2012). Jürgen Habermas Y la religión en la esfera pública. Ideas Y Valores 61 (148):59-78.
    Se examinan las dificultades que tiene la propuesta de Jürgen Habermas sobre el papel de la religión en la esfera pública, para dilucidar y analizar sus presupuestos filosóficos. Una vez presentada la propuesta habermasiana, se presentan cinco objeciones, tomando como base el debate sobre los matrim..
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14. Rolf Ahlers (1975). How Critical is Critical Theory?: Reflections on Jurgen Habermas. Philosophy and Social Criticism 3 (2):119-136.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15. I. Ahn (2009). Decolonization of the Lifeworld by Reconstructing the System: A Critical Dialogue Between Jurgen Habermas and Reinhold Niebuhr. Studies in Christian Ethics 22 (3):290-313.
    For all Habermas's remarkable contribution to moral theory, his discourse ethics has left behind some debatable points. In particular, `delinguistified media' such as money and power have been excluded from the domain of moral discourse. The exclusion of money and power from the domain of moral discourse has also motivated Habermas to develop an idea of `colonization of lifeworld by system' by giving us the impression that the delinguistified media are the main culprit of colonizing the lifeworld. In this article, (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16. Jacob Ale Aigbodioh (2011). Stigmatization in African Communalistic Societies and Habermas' Theory of Rationality. Cultura 8 (1):27-48.
    The phenomenon of widespread stigmatization of victims of deadly, or previously incurable, diseases in African traditional societies would appear to pragmatically contradict the humanistic values of communalism associated with those societies. However, the implied contradiction of the phenomenon, which borders on irrationality and injustice, seems amenable to a rational explanation when one considers the thick ontological underpinnings of African traditional communalism along with their epistemic significance. The justification of the proffered explanation, the paper avers, is made clearer when it is (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17. Jan Ajzner (1994). Some Problems of Rationality, Understanding, and Universalistic Ethics in the Context of Habermas's Theory of Communicative Action. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 24 (4):466-484.
    The arguments presented in this discussion point to some problems in the theory of communicative action considered as a starting point for a sociological theory with both normative and explanatory aspirations. It is argued that Habermas's notion of consensus is not sufficiently developed to constitute a foundation of the ethics of public debates; that both social action and communicative action are grounded in social actors' references to the same three worlds, which makes the coordination of actions by means of understanding (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  18. Lars Albinus (2013). Can Science Cope with More Than One World? A Cross-Reading of Habermas, Popper, and Searle. Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 44 (1):3-20.
    The purpose of this article is to critically assess the ‘three-world theory’ as it is presented—with some slight but decisive differences—by Jürgen Habermas and Karl Popper. This theory presents the philosophy of science with a conceptual and material problem, insofar as it claims that science has no single access to all aspects of the world. Although I will try to demonstrate advantages of Popper’s idea of ‘the third world’ of ideas, the shortcomings of his ontological stance become visible from the (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  19. Robert Alexy (1994). Basic Rights and Democracy in Jurgen Habermas's Procedural Paradigm of the Law. Ratio Juris 7 (2):227-238.
  20. Luigi Alfieri & Antonio De Simone (eds.) (2009). Per Habermas: Seminario (2009): Interventi Su "Intersoggettività E Norma". Morlacchi.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21. C. F. Alford (1987). Habermas, Post-Freudian Psychoanalysis, and the End of the Individual. Theory, Culture and Society 4 (1):3-29.
    For some time now a number of critics have argued that Juergen Habermas has misinterpreted Freud. The gist of this criticism is that Habermas' interpretation of psychoanalysis as `depth hermeneutics' must violate the intent of Freud's work, which is so deeply grounded in drive theory. In other words, Habermas confuses philosophical reflection with psychoanalysis. This paper takes a somewhat different focus. It examines the consequences of Habermas' interpretation of Freud for Habermas' view of the individual. It is shown that Habermas' (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22. C. Fred Alford (1985). Is Jürgen Habermas's Reconstructive Science Really Science? Theory and Society 14 (3):321-340.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  23. C. Fred Alford (1985). Science and the Revenge of Nature Marcuse & Habermas.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  24. A. Allen (2014). Reason, Power and History: Re-Reading the Dialectic of Enlightenment. Thesis Eleven 120 (1):10-25.
    This paper re-examines the relationship between power, reason and history in Horkheimer and Adorno’s "Dialectic of Enlightenment." Contesting Habermas’ highly influential reading of the text, I argue that "Dialectic of Enlightenment," far from being a dead-end for critical theory, opens up important lines of thought in the philosophy of history that contemporary critical theorists would do well to recover. My focus is on the relationship that Horkheimer and Adorno trace between enlightenment rationality and the domination of inner and outer nature.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25. A. Allen (2011). The Power of Disclosure: Comments on Nikolas Kompridis' Critique and Disclosure. Philosophy and Social Criticism 37 (9):1025-1031.
    This article discusses the relationship between power and reflective disclosure in Nikolas Kompridis' book "Critique and Disclosure." Although the concept of power is not explicitly theorized in great detail in this book, I argue that power is highly relevant for Kompridis' account of reflective disclosure. I offer a few ways in which a thematization of power relations might complicate and enrich Kompridis' understanding of disclosure.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26. Amy Allen (2016). Psychoanalysis and the Methodology of Critique. Constellations 23 (2):244-254.
    In his account of critical theory as diagnosing social pathologies of reason, Axel Honneth has rehabilitated the analogy between critical theory and psychoanalysis – according to which the critical theorist stands in relation to the pathological social order as the analyst stands in relation to the analysand, and the aim of critical theory is to effect the diagnosis and, ultimately, the cure of social disorders or pathologies. In this article, I show that Honneth, like Habermas before him, has an overly (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27. Amy Allen (2012). The Unforced Force of the Better Argument: Reason and Power in Habermas' Political Theory. Constellations 19 (3):353-368.
    The tension between reason and power has a long and illustrious history in political theory. In his magnum opus of legal and political theory, "Between Facts and Norms," Jürgen Habermas presents his most complex, sophisticated, and ambitious attempt to confront this tension. My thesis in this article is that though Habermas’s political theory thematizes the tension between reason and power in a way that is initially quite promising, he ultimately forecloses that tension in the direction of a rationality that has (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28. Amy Allen (2009). Discourse, Power, and Subjectivation: The Foucault/Habermas Debate Reconsidered. Philosophical Forum 40 (1):1-28.
    In this article, I take up one strand – arguably the central one – of the Foucault/Habermas debate: their respective accounts of subjectivation. Against those who hold that Foucault and Habermas occupy such drastically different theoretical perspectives as to preclude the integration of their views into a common framework, I begin to lay the groundwork for an account of subjectivation that draws on the conceptual insights to be found on each side of the debate. While both Foucault and Habermas offer (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  29. Amy R. Allen (2007). Systematically Distorted Subjectivity?: Habermas and the Critique of Power. Philosophy and Social Criticism 33 (5):641-650.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  30. Barry Allen (1990). Jürgen Habermas, The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry Into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Trans. Thomas Burger Reviewed By. [REVIEW] Philosophy in Review 10 (6):228-232.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31. Barry Allen (1988). Jürgen Habermas, The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 8 (10):402-405.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32. Barry Allen (1988). Jürgen Habermas, The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity. [REVIEW] Philosophy in Review 8:402-405.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33. Federico Altbach-Núñez (2010). Cultura urbana y educación como desafíos a la teoría de Habermas del actuar comunicativo. Conjectura: Filosofia E Educação 14 (3):85-106.
    Resumen : Habermas realiza una contribución significativa a los estudios urbanos y a las ciencias de la educación. El mundo urbano representa un verdadero reto para la racionalidad comunicativa. La vida en las ciudades latinoamericanas parece ser, hasta cierto punto, un caos de códigos lingüísticos y de símbolos, donde mucha gente actúa de un modo individualista y apático. De ahí que sea difícil esperar que los habitantes urbanos sean capaces de cooperar mutuamente a fin de construi rsu sociedad sobre la (...)
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34. Danilo Alterado (2009). Universities and Democratization: Habermas on Education. Philosophia 38 (1).
    This paper is an attempt to explicate Jürgen Habermas’s discourse on education vis-à-vis his political project of a democratized society. Arguably, Habermas sees in the structures and processes inherent in the universities an ideal place for self-reflection and communicative action. Thus, his idea of a university is tied up with the potentials of establishing an emancipated, enlightened society. The agencies of selfreflection hinge with democratic practices and processes, and the facility of communicative action even in a differentiated and specialized learning (...)
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35. Lilian Alweiss (2005). Philosophy in a Time of Terror. Review of Metaphysics 59 (2):406-409.
  36. Peter Amato (2001). Habermas's “Other” Legitimation Crisis: Critical-Philosophical Dimensions. Radical Philosophy Review 4 (1/2):205-228.
    A kind of political complacency has become a common complaint of Habermasian philosophy. At odds with some earlier stances, according to which he had claimed to represent the best critical hopes of a Marxist tradition that he regarded as exhausted, Habermas has come to defend the legitimacy of liberal democratic institutions and forms ofpolitical expression. No longer the last Marxist, but a hesitant post-Marxist, Habermas is today arguably the foremost intellectual spokesperson for a presently existing democracy which bears as much (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37. Javed Iqbal Ameeri, Habermas Philosophy of Language.
    Jurgen Habermas is today not only of Germany’s but also one of the west’s leading philosophers, social and political theorists. He combines all three qualities in himself. This thesis, therefore explores his philosophy of language in an expository mode and set in a developmental framework. The former facet is meant to bring but the strengths and weaknesses of his theory while the latter puts his work in perspective showing how Habermas has responded to criticisms and modified, improved or strengthened his (...)
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38. Joel Anderson (2005). Jurgen Habermas, The Future of Human Nature, Translated by Hella Beister, Max Pensky, and William Rehg:The Future of Human Nature. Ethics 115 (4):816-821.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39. Alexander Anievas (2010). 13 On Habermas, Marx and the Critical Theory Tradition. In Cerwyn Moore & Chris Farrands (eds.), International Relations Theory and Philosophy: Interpretive Dialogues. Routledge. pp. 80--144.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40. F. R. Ankersmit (2004). The Postnational Constellation. Common Knowledge 10 (2):358-358.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41. Londoño Ángel Edgar Antonio, Ética Y democracia en Jürgen Habermas. Discurso 1:2.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42. Karl-Otto Apel, Ma De Oliveira & L. Moreira (2002). Regarding the Relationship of Morality, Law and Democracy: On Habermas's Philosophy of Law (1992) From a Transcendental-Pragmatic Point of View. In.: ABOULAFIA, M. In Mitchell Aboulafia, Myra Orbach Bookman & Cathy Kemp (eds.), Habermas and Pragmatism. Routledge.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  43. Karl-Otto Appel (2001). La relation entre morale, droit et démocratie. Les Etudes Philosophiques 56 (1):67.
    L’article est une prise de position critique à propos du livre de Habermas Faktizität und Geltung . Plus précisément, il s’agit d’une critique de l’ « architectonique” de la différenciation discussionnelle, menée à propos du rapport entre principe de discussion, principe moral, principe du droit et principe démocratique. Mon point de vue résulte de la position de l’éthique de la discussion comme discipline de base de la philosophie pratique, dans la perspective d’une fondation pragmatique-transcendantale ultime. Une « architectonique » alternative (...)
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44. Luiz Bernardo Leite Araújo (2007). Liberalismo, identidade e reconhecimento em Habermas. Veritas: Revista de Filosofia da PUCRS 52 (1):120-136.
    O artigo apresenta a posição ocupada pela teoria discursiva de Jürgen Habermas no debate entre liberalismo e multiculturalismo. Adotando uma perspectiva universalista sensível às diferenças, resultante da tese da relação interna entre democracia e estado constitucional, Habermas enfoca três aspectos interligados e diretamente vinculados à questão do reconhecimento: a idéia liberal de igualdade, os direitos de grupos e o igual tratamento das culturas. A defesa da conjugação do ideal igualitário da cidadania democrática com as demandas legítimas de indivíduos e grupos (...)
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45. Johann Pall Arnason (2000). Globalism, Ideology and Traditions: Interview with Jurgen Habermas. Thesis Eleven 63 (1):1-10.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  46. Vilhjálmur Árnason (2014). From Species Ethics to Social Concerns: Habermas’s Critique of “Liberal Eugenics” Evaluated. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 35 (5):353-367.
    Three arguments of Habermas against “liberal eugenics”—the arguments from consent, responsibility, and instrumentalization—are critically evaluated and explicated in the light of his discourse ethics and social theory. It is argued that these arguments move partly at a too deep level and are in part too individualistic and psychological to sufficiently counter the liberal position that he sets out to criticize. This is also due to limitations that prevent discourse ethics from connecting effectively to the moral and political domains, e.g., through (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  47. Samantha Ashenden (2014). On Violence in Habermas's Philosophy of Language. European Journal of Political Theory 13 (4):427-452.
    Habermas does not rule out the possibility of violence in language. In fact his account explicitly licenses a broad conception of violence as ‘systematically distorted communication’. Yet he does rule out the possibility that language simultaneously imposes as it discloses. That is, his argument precludes the possibility of recognizing that there is an antinomy at the heart of language and philosophical reason. This occlusion of the simultaneously world-disclosing and world-imposing character of language feeds and sustains Habermas’s legal and political arguments, (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48. Samantha Ashenden (1998). Pluralism Within the Limits of Reason Alone? Habermas and the Discursive Negotiation of Consensus. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 1 (3):117-136.
  49. Samantha Ashenden & David Owen (eds.) (1999). Foucault Contra Habermas: Recasting the Dialogue Between Genealogy and Critical Theory. Sage Publications.
    Foucault contra Habermas is an incisive examination of, and a comprehensive introduction to, the debate between Foucault and Habermas over the meaning of enlightenment and modernity. It reprises the key issues in the argument between critical theory and genealogy and is organised around three complementary themes: defining the context of the debate; examining the theoretical and conceptual tools used; and discussing the implications for politics and criticism. In a detailed reply to Habermas' Philosophical Discourse of Modernity, this volume explains the (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  50. Catherine Audard (2011). Rawls and Habermas on the Place of Religion in the Political Domain. In James Gordon Finlayson & Fabian Freyenhagen (eds.), Habermas and Rawls: Disputing the Political. Rouledge.
1 — 50 / 1349