About this topic
Summary The nature of the human mind is a central concern in all of Kant's major works. His view of the mind is shaped by two fundamental distinctions: (1) activity vs. passivity and (2) form vs. matter. The paradigmatic activity of the mind, for Kant, is judgment, which involves the unification of representations through concepts. This activity is directed at intuitions/sensations, which are distinguished by our passivity in receiving them. While both judgment and intuition involve certain forms, the latter is the source of all the matter of our experience. Judgments, for Kant, are essentially connected to self-consciousness. Kant gives broadly similar accounts of practical and aesthetic experience, in each case emphasizing forms that we actively apply to the passive elements of our mental lives.
Key works The Critique of Pure Reason is taken by most scholars as the definitive statement of Kant's philosophy of mind, especially the 1787 B edition. Many of Kant's later works provide useful elaborations, however, especially the introductions to the 1790 Critique of the Power of Judgment.
Introductions The secondary literature on Kant's philosophy of mind is vast. For an overview of issues concerning the nature of the mind and self-consciousness, see Brook 2008. For an overview of Kant's theory of judgment and how it fits into his larger project, see Hanna 2008. For an introductory discussion of how Kant's views of the mind relate to his early modern predecessors, see Kitcher 2006.
Related categories

2159 found
Order:
1 — 50 / 2159
Material to categorize
  1. James R. O’Shea (Ed.), Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason: A Critical Guide Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017 Pp. 297 ISBN 9781107074811 (Hbk) $99.99. [REVIEW]Andrew Jones - 2020 - Kantian Review 25 (2):317-321.
  2. Replies to the Comments of Paul Guyer and Andrew Chignell.Marcus Willaschek - 2020 - Kantian Review 25 (2):295-311.
  3. Alfredo Ferrarin, Thinking and the I: Hegel and the Critique of Kant Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 2019 Pp. 256ISBN: 9780810139381 (Pbk) $34.95. [REVIEW]Paul T. Wilford - 2020 - Kantian Review 25 (2):327-333.
  4. Kant’s Innovative Theory of Judgment and Cognition in the False Subtlety of Syllogistic Figures.Mihaela Vatavu - 2019 - Kant-Studien 110 (4):527-553.
    Kant’s early work The False Subtlety of the Four Syllogistic Figures is typically considered a narrow, technical work still embedded in the tradition of Wolffian logic. I argue instead that it needs to be considered in light of Kant’s developing theory of cognition and his corresponding criticism of the Wolffian single faculty theory. Whereas the mature Kant criticizes the rationalists for misrepresenting the nature of sensibility, the urgent task facing him at this stage seems to have been a proper determination (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  5. Matthias Birrer: Kant und die Heterogenität der Erkenntnisquellen. Berlin/boston: De Gruyter, 2017. 327 Seiten. ISBN 978-3-11-054238-7.Kant und die Heterogenität der Erkenntnisquellen. [REVIEW]Reinhard Hiltscher - 2020 - Kant-Studien 111 (1):139-145.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  6. Immanuel Kant: Die Einheit des Bewusstseins. Hrsg. von Giuseppe Motta und Udo Thiel. Kantstudien-Ergänzungshefte 197. Berlin/boston: Walter de Gruyter, 2017. VI, 284 Seiten. ISBN 978-3-11-055766-4.Immanuel Kant: Die Einheit des Bewusstseins. [REVIEW]Michael Pluder - 2020 - Kant-Studien 111 (1):148-151.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  7. Sankarāchārya and Kantian Notion of Consciousness.Manas Kumar Sahu - forthcoming - Advaitya Utsav Conference.
    In this paper, my objective is to show how Sankarāchārya's concept of reality is deferent from the Kantian notion of reality, despite many similarities between them. Cartesian skepticism of universal doubt is a challenged for the Kantian notion of reality; however, it can't be applied to Sankarāchārya's concept of reality because of the acceptance of different paradigm to explain the reality and Sankarāchārya's non-representationalistic approach towards the reality. The attack on representationalism can't be applicable to Sankarāchārya's philosophy.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  8. Robert Hanna: Cognition, Content, and the A Priori. A Study in the Philosophy of Mind and Knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015. 464 Seiten. ISBN 978-0-19871629-7.Cognition, Content, and the A Priori. A Study in the Philosophy of Mind and Knowledge. [REVIEW]Reinhard Hiltscher - 2019 - Kant-Studien 110 (2):303-307.
  9. Lucy Allais: Manifest Reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015. 329 Pp. ISBN 978-0-19-874713-0. Manifest Reality. [REVIEW]Jacinto Rivera de Rosales - 2019 - Kant-Studien 110 (2):290-294.
  10. Béatrice Longuenesse: I, Me, Mine. Back to Kant, and Back Again. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017. XVIII, 257 Seiten. ISBN 978-0-19-966576-1.I, Me, Mine. Back to Kant, and Back Again. [REVIEW]Annett Wienmeister - 2019 - Kant-Studien 110 (2):297-303.
    Name der Zeitschrift: Kant-Studien Jahrgang: 110 Heft: 2 Seiten: 297-303.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  11. Kant on Common-Sense and the Unity of Judgments of Taste.Samuel A. Stoner - 2019 - Kant Yearbook 11 (1):81-99.
    Though the notion of common-sense plays an important role in Kant’s aesthetic theory, it is not immediately clear what Kant means by this term. This essay works to clarify the role that common-sense plays in the logic of Kant’s argument. My interpretive hypothesis is that a careful examination of the way common-sense functions in Kant’s account of judgments of taste can help explain what this notion means. I argue that common-sense names the capacity to discern the relation between the cognitive (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  12. Aesthetic Judgment as Parasitic on Cognition.Aaron Halper - 2019 - Kant Yearbook 11 (1):41-59.
    When we judge something to be beautiful, do we identify an inherent feature of the object, or only our subjective response to it? This paper argues that, for Kant, pure aesthetic judgment occupies a middle ground. Such judgments are based upon affective responses to our own cognitive faculties. Thus, pure aesthetic judgment is subjective insofar as it concerns our feeling ourselves to be engaged in a certain task; it is objective insofar as the task we are engaged in is cognition (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  13. Die Zeit der Einbildungskraft - Die Rolle des Schematismus in Kants Erkenntnistheorie.Rainer Schäfer - 2019 - Kant-Studien 110 (3):437-462.
    In this paper, I focus on Kant’s doctrine of figurative synthesis. Figurative synthesis is the result of the activity of productive transcendental imagination. This is the chief problem of the so-called “second proof step” in Kant’s deduction of the categories according to the second edition of the Critique of Pure Reason. The pure original synthetic apperception forms in the inner and outer sense - i. e. in time and space - by self-affection structures of order that make it possible to (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  14. Martin Bondeli: Kant Über Selbstaffektion. Basel: Colmena Verlag, 2018. 136 Seiten. ISBN: 978-3-906896-06-9.Kant Über Selbstaffektion.Jindřich Karásek - 2019 - Kant-Studien 110 (3):512-515.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  15. The Oxford Handbook of Kant.Andrew Stephenson & Anil Gomes - forthcoming - Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  16. Martin Bondeli: Kant Über Selbstaffektion. Basel: Colmena Verlag, 2018. 136 Seiten. ISBN: 978-3-906896-06-9.Kant Über Selbstaffektion. [REVIEW]Jindřich Karásek - 2019 - Kant-Studien 110 (3):512-515.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  17. Lucy Allais: Manifest Reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015. 329 Pp. ISBN 978-0-19-874713-0. Manifest Reality. [REVIEW]Jacinto Rivera de Rosales - 2019 - Kant-Studien 110 (2):290-294.
    Name der Zeitschrift: Kant-Studien Jahrgang: 110 Heft: 2 Seiten: 290-294.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  18. Robert Hanna: Cognition, Content, and the A Priori. A Study in the Philosophy of Mind and Knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015. 464 Seiten. ISBN 978-0-19871629-7.Cognition, Content, and the A Priori. A Study in the Philosophy of Mind and Knowledge. [REVIEW]Reinhard Hiltscher - 2019 - Kant-Studien 110 (2):303-307.
    Name der Zeitschrift: Kant-Studien Jahrgang: 110 Heft: 2 Seiten: 303-307.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  19. R. Lanier Anderson: The Poverty of Conceptual Truth. Kant’s Analytic/Synthetic Distinction and the Limits of Metaphysics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015. XVIII U. 408 Seiten. ISBN: 978-0-19872457-5. [REVIEW]Michael Pluder - 2019 - Kant-Studien 110 (2):294-297.
    Name der Zeitschrift: Kant-Studien Jahrgang: 110 Heft: 2 Seiten: 294-297.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  20. Algunos comentarios sobre las dos ediciones de la ‘Crítica de la Razón Pura’ y su recepción en la fenomenología de Husserl.Stephanie Martinic Caneo - 2019 - Hybris, Revista de Filosofí­A 10 (1):197-216.
    En este artículo me propongo mostrar ciertos aspectos de la filosofía de Kant que podrían haber servido como antecedente a la elaboración de la fenomenología por parte de Husserl. Se toma para este respecto la Deducción de los conceptos puros del entendimiento como sistematización del criticismo kantiano, pero, además, por la controversia que las dos ediciones de la Crítica de la razón pura suscitan en torno a la imaginación en esta sección. Una vez expuesta esta parte de la Crítica en (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  21. The Parity and Disparity Between Inner and Outer Experience in Kant.Katharina Kraus - 2019 - Kantian Review 24 (2):171-195.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  22. Kelly Sorensen and Diane Williamson , Kant and the Faculty of Feeling Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018 Pp. X + 276 ISBN: 9781107178229 £75.00. [REVIEW]Michael H. Walschots - 2019 - Kantian Review 24 (2):322-327.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  23. Kant: Constitutivism as Capacities-First Philosophy.Karl Schafer - 2019 - Philosophical Explorations 22 (2):177-193.
    Over the last two decades, Kant’s name has become closely associated with the “constitutivist” program within metaethics. But is Kant best read as pursuing a constitutivist approach to meta- normative questions? And if so, in what sense? In this essay, I’ll argue that we can best answer these questions by considering them in the context of a broader issue – namely, how Kant understands the proper methodology for philosophy in general. The result of this investigation will be that, while Kant (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  24. Perceptual Experience in Kant and Merleau-Ponty.Peter Antich - 2019 - Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 50 (3):220-233.
    I argue that the descriptions of perceptual experience offered by Kant and Merleau-Ponty are, contrary to what many commentators suppose, largely compatible. This is because the two are simply referring to different things when they talk about experience: Kant to empirical cognition and Merleau-Ponty to perception. Consequently, while Merleau-Ponty correctly denies that Kant accurately describes the conditions for the possibility of perception, Kant nevertheless provides a plausible account of the conditions of empirical judgment. Further, the two approach experience with different (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  25. Kant on de Se.Luca Forgione - 2018 - In Violetta Waibel, Margit Ruffing & David Wagner (eds.), Natur und Freiheit: Akten des XII. Internationalen Kant-Kongresses. Berlino, Germania: De Gruyter. pp. 3779-3786.
    Since the classic works by Castañeda, Perry and Lewis, de se thoughts have been described as thoughts about oneself ‘as oneself’. In recent years, various theoretical perspectives have gained ground, and even if the transcendental system does not seem to contemplate an explicit articulation of de se thoughts, apparently a few features of transcendental apperception and I think do anticipate a few points in Perry and Recanati’s claims on the so-called implicit de se thoughts in the specific terms of Transcendentalism.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  26. Yirmiyahu Yovel, Kant’s Philosophical Revolution: A Short Guide to the Critique of Pure Reason Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2018 Pp. X + 128 ISBN 9780681180526. [REVIEW]J. Colin McQuillan - 2019 - Kantian Review 24 (1):166-168.
  27. Kant and the Primacy of Judgment Before the First Critique.Patrick R. Leland - 2019 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 57 (2):281-312.
    Some claim Kant’s commitment to the explanatory priority of judgments over concepts is one of his most important contributions to the philosophy of mind. There is, however, extensive disagreement over the nature and extent of this commitment. Existing interpretations ignore a substantial body of textual evidence and offer no account of the origins of Kant’s view. This paper corrects for these deficiencies. I explain, first, the relevant accounts of concept possession Kant encountered in the writings of his predecessors; and, second, (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  28. Критика Кантом учения Декарта о cogito.Arsenii Khitrov - 2005 - In Форум молодых кантоведов (По материалам Международного конгресса, посвященного 280-летию со дня рождения и 200-летию со дня смерти Иммануила Канта). pp. 44–51.
  29. Was heißt „Ich denke ist ein empirischer Satz“?Hyeongjoo Kim - 2019 - Kant-Studien 110 (1):136-159.
    Name der Zeitschrift: Kant-Studien Jahrgang: 110 Heft: 1 Seiten: 136-159.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  30. Kants Begriff der Vernunft.Esther Marx - 2019 - Kant-Studien 110 (1):1-48.
    Name der Zeitschrift: Kant-Studien Jahrgang: 110 Heft: 1 Seiten: 1-48.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  31. Thomas C. Vinci: Space, Geometry, and Kant’s Transcendental Deduction of the Categories. New York 2015. 264 Seiten. ISBN 978-0-19-938116-6.Space, Geometry, and Kant’s Transcendental Deduction of the Categories. [REVIEW]P. D. Arno Schubbach - 2019 - Kant-Studien 110 (1):166-171.
    Name der Zeitschrift: Kant-Studien Jahrgang: 110 Heft: 1 Seiten: 166-171.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  32. Kant and the Problem of Self-Knowledge.Luca Forgione - 2018 - New York, Stati Uniti: Routledge.
    This book addresses the problem of self-knowledge in Kant’s philosophy. As Kant writes in his major works of the critical period, it is due to the simple and empty representation ‘I think’ that the subject’s capacity for self-consciousness enables the subject to represent its own mental dimension. This book articulates Kant’s theory of self-knowledge on the basis of the following three philosophical problems: 1) a semantic problem regarding the type of reference of the representation ‘I’; 2) an epistemic problem regarding (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  33. Kant’s Intuitionism: A Commentary on the Transcendental Aesthetic.Lorne Falkenstein (ed.) - 1995 - University of Toronto Press.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   34 citations  
  34. Religion and Early German Romanticism.Jacqueline Mariña - forthcoming - In Elizabeth Millan (ed.), Palgrave Handbook of German Romantic Philosophy.
    This paper explores the reception of Kant's understanding of consciousness by both Romantics and Idealists from 1785 to 1799, and traces its impact on the theory of religion. I first look at Kant's understanding of consciousness as developed in the first Critique, and then looks at how figures such as Fichte, Jacobi, Hölderlin, Novalis, and Schleiermacher received this theory of consciousness and its implications for their understanding of religion.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  35. Selfhood and Relationality.Jacqueline Mariña - 2017 - In Joel Rasmussen, Judith Wolfe & Johannes Zachhuber (eds.), Oxford Handbook for Nineteenth Century Christian Thought. Oxford University Press. pp. 127-142.
    Nineteenth century Christian thought about self and relationality was stamped by the reception of Kant’s groundbreaking revision to the Cartesian cogito. For René Descartes (1596-1650), the self is a thinking thing (res cogitans), a simple substance retaining its unity and identity over time. For Immanuel Kant (1724-1804), on the other hand, consciousness is not a substance but an ongoing activity having a double constitution, or two moments: first, the original activity of consciousness, what Kant would call original apperception, and second, (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  36. Kant and Husserl on Bringing Perception to Judgment.Corijn Van Mazijk - 2016 - Meta: Research in Hermeneutics, Phenomenology, and Practical Philosophy 8 (2):419-441.
    There is today much debate about the contents of perceptual experience relative to our capacity to make them figure in judgments. There is considerably less interest, however, in how we subsume perceptual contents in judgments, that is, what judging about a perception is like for us. For Kant and Husserl, this second question is as important as the first. Whereas Kant tries to answer it in the schematism section of the first Critique, Husserl addresses it at length in Experience and (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  37. On Wayne Waxman's Kant's Anatomy of the Intelligent Mind. [REVIEW]John J. Callanan - 2018 - Critique 2018.
    Longer review of Waxman's recent book, Kant's Anatomy of the Intelligent Mind.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  38. On the Border of Self-Appearance. Self-Affection and Reflection in the Remembering in Kant and Husserl.Guillermo Ferrer - 2015 - HORIZON. Studies in Phenomenology 4 (2):87-98.
  39. The Preface to the Translation of K. Kaehler’s Article “Consciousness and its Phenomena: Leibniz, Kant, Husserl”.A. Patkul & O. Bashkina - 2014 - HORIZON. Studies in Phenomenology 3 (1):165-170.
  40. Husserl’s Covert Critique of Kant in the Sixth Book of Logical Investigations.Corijn van Mazijk - 2019 - Continental Philosophy Review 52 (1):15-33.
    In the final book of Logical Investigations from 1901, Husserl develops a theory of knowledge based on the intentional structure of consciousness. While there is some textual evidence that Husserl considered this to entail a critique of Kantian philosophy, he did not elaborate substantially on this. This paper reconstructs the covert critique of Kant’s theory of knowledge which LI contains. With respect to Kant, I discuss three core aspects of his theory of knowledge which, as Husserl’s reflections on Kant indicate, (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  41. Reconstructing Opacity. Husserlian Motivation as a ‘Third Synthesis’.Francesca Dell'Orto - 2011 - Lebenswelt: Aesthetics and Philosophy of Experience 1:88-96.
    In this article I propose to read the Husserlian notion of ‘motivation’ by comparison with the Kantian Schematism, in order to understand its peculiar status and time frame. I maintain that motivations – like a third synthesis in addition to retention and recollection – mediate and organize the flux of retentions and protentions by intercession of external supports. Thus, they offer the means to thematize history and, consequently, to recast the transcendental basis of Phenomenology taking the opacity of consciousness into (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  42. Kant on the Logical Form of Singular Judgments.Huaping Lu-Adler - 2014 - Kantian Review 19 (3):367-92.
    At A71/B96–7 Kant explains that singular judgements are ‘special’ because they stand to the general ones as Einheit to Unendlichkeit. The reference to Einheit brings to mind the category of unity and hence raises a spectre of circularity in Kant’s explanation. I aim to remove this spectre by interpreting the Einheit-Unendlichkeit contrast in light of the logical distinctions among universal, particular and singular judgments shared by Kant and his logician predecessors. This interpretation has a further implication for resolving a controversy (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  43. Teoria crítica da sensibilidade e contrapartidas incongruentes em Kant.Marcos Seneda - 2017 - Kant E-Prints 12 (2):10-27.
    A Estética Transcendental é uma peça chave no programa de pesquisa que Kant desenvolveu e nomeou de filosofia transcendental. Ela se anuncia na Dissertação de 1770 e se configura de forma bem explícita na primeira edição da Crítica da razão pura, de 1781. O modo como Kant a concebeu permitiu-lhe separar radicalmente intelecto e sensibilidade, mas seria importante compreender a raiz dessa separação. Nesse texto procuramos mostrar que o opúsculo “Sobre o primeiro fundamento da distinção de direções no espaço”, de (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  44. Review: Beatrice Longuenesse, I , Me, Mine: Back to Kant and Back Again. [REVIEW]Naomi Fisher - 2018 - Review of Metaphysics 71 (4):812-814.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  45. Kant on Consciousness in Animals.Patrick R. Leland - 2018 - Studi Kantiani 31:75-107.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  46. Overcoming the Disunity of Understanding.Alexander Albert Jeuk - 2017 - Meta: Research in Hermeneutics, Phenomenology, and Practical Philosophy 9 (2):630-653.
    I argue that embodied understanding and conceptual-representational understanding interact through schematic structure. I demonstrate that common conceptions of these two kinds of understanding, such as developed by Wheeler (2005, 2008) and Dreyfus (2007a, b, 2013), entail a separation between them that gives rise to significant problems. Notably, it becomes unclear how they could interact; a problem that has been pointed out by Dreyfus (2007a, b, 2013) and McDowell (2007) in particular. I propose a Kantian strategy to close the gap between (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  47. From the Naturalistic to the Transcendental Conception of Intentionality.Zhongwei Li - 2018 - Comparative and Continental Philosophy 10 (1):74-87.
    ABSTRACTThis paper reconstructs and defends a Husserlian transcendental conception of intentionality. Initially, naturalistic conception of intentionality seems attractive, however, a naturalistic understanding conceals the true meaning of the puzzle and the nature of intentionality. Following Kant and primarily Husserl, this paper tries to determine the conditions a transcendental conception of intentionality must satisfy in order to be qualified as “transcendental”. Additionally, following Husserl, this paper argues that the alternative transcendental conception is not only possible, hence plausible; but also necessary, in (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  48. Deduction Difficulties – ADDENDUM.Robert Howell - 2018 - Kantian Review 23 (2):347-347.
  49. Anil Gomes and Andrew Stephenson , Kant and the Philosophy of Mind: Perception, Reason, and the Self Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017 Pp. Xiv+282 9780198724957 $60.00. [REVIEW]Tim Jankowiak - 2018 - Kantian Review 23 (2):332-337.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  50. Dennis Schulting , Kantian Nonconceptualism Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2016 Pp. xxvi+322 9781137535160 £72.00.Alexandra Newton - 2018 - Kantian Review 23 (2):329-332.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
1 — 50 / 2159