About this topic
Summary The nature of the human mind is a central concern in all of Kant's major works. His view of the mind is shaped by two fundamental distinctions: (1) activity vs. passivity and (2) form vs. matter. The paradigmatic activity of the mind, for Kant, is judgment, which involves the unification of representations through concepts. This activity is directed at intuitions/sensations, which are distinguished by our passivity in receiving them. While both judgment and intuition involve certain forms, the latter is the source of all the matter of our experience. Judgments, for Kant, are essentially connected to self-consciousness. Kant gives broadly similar accounts of practical and aesthetic experience, in each case emphasizing forms that we actively apply to the passive elements of our mental lives.
Key works The Critique of Pure Reason is taken by most scholars as the definitive statement of Kant's philosophy of mind, especially the 1787 B edition. Many of Kant's later works provide useful elaborations, however, especially the introductions to the 1790 Critique of the Power of Judgment.
Introductions The secondary literature on Kant's philosophy of mind is vast. For an overview of issues concerning the nature of the mind and self-consciousness, see Brook 2008. For an overview of Kant's theory of judgment and how it fits into his larger project, see Hanna 2008. For an introductory discussion of how Kant's views of the mind relate to his early modern predecessors, see Kitcher 2006.
Related categories

2270 found
Order:
1 — 50 / 2270
Material to categorize
  1. Kant and Psychological Monism: The Case of Inclination.Melissa Merritt - forthcoming - In Jonas Held & James Conant (eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of German Idealism and Analytic Philosophy. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
    It is widely assumed that Kant’s moral psychology draws from the dualist tradition of Plato and Aristotle, which takes there to be distinct rational and non-rational parts of the soul. My aim is to challenge the air of obviousness that psychological dualism enjoys in neo-Kantian moral psychology, specifically in regard to Tamar Schapiro’s account of the nature of inclination. I argue that Kant’s own account of inclination instead provides evidence of his commitment to psychological monism, the idea that the mentality (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  2. Kant on Reason as the Capacity for Comprehension.Karl Schafer - forthcoming - Australasian Journal of Philosophy:1-19.
    This essay develops an interpretation of Kant’s conception of the faculty of reason as the capacity for what he calls "comprehension" (Begreifen). In doing so, it first discusses Kant's characterizations of reason in relation to what he describes as the two highest grades of cognition—insight and comprehension. Then it discusses how the resulting conception of reason relates to more familiar characterizations as the faculty for inference and the faculty of principles. In doing so, it focuses on how the idea of (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  3. Corijn van Mazijk: Perception and Reality in Kant, Husserl, and McDowell, New York: Routledge, 2020, 192 Pp., ISBN 978-0-367-44180-7, ISBN 978-1-003-01022-7. [REVIEW]Kristjan Laasik - 2022 - Continental Philosophy Review 55 (1):119-123.
    Corijn van Mazijk’s book is a critical exploration of the relations between Immanuel Kant’s, Edmund Husserl’s, and John McDowell’s transcendental philosophies. His primary aim is not to conduct a historical study, but “to show that history provides us with viable alternatives to McDowell’s theory of our perceptual access to reality.” The book covers a variety of McDowellian themes: the Myth of the Given, the space of reasons vs. the space of nature, conceptualism, disjunctivism, naturalism, and realism—uncovering the roots of McDowell’s (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  4. Equine Driving: Plato, Kant and Fichte on the Teamwork of the Mind.Günter Zöller - 2021 - In Manja Kisner & Jörg Noller (eds.), The Concept of Drive in Classical German Philosophy: Between Biology, Anthropology, and Metaphysics. Palgrave-Macmillan. pp. 191-211.
    The chapter places the recourse to the concept of drive in the accounts of practical subjectivity in Fichte into the historical and systematic context of Platonic and Kantian thinking about the psycho-politics of self-rule. Part 1 presents Plato’s comparison of the soul’s set-up and manner of operation to a team of horses of opposed character that are driven by a seriously challenged charioteer. Part 2 first addresses Kant’s account of the irrational and rational modes of practical subjectivity and then traces (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  5. The Drive to Society in Kant’s Critique of the Power of Judgment.Dietmar Heidemann - 2021 - In Manja Kisner & Jörg Noller (eds.), The Concept of Drive in Classical German Philosophy: Between Biology, Anthropology, and Metaphysics. Palgrave-Macmillan. pp. 149-168.
    Prima facie, the concept of “drive” is not central or even relevant to the project of the Critique of the Power of Judgment. Other than one might expect, Kant, especially in the teleology, is not engaging with this concept and its cognates in great detail. On the other hand, the concept of “drive” is pivotal in his philosophy of history and culture as spelled out in the “Doctrine of Method” of the third Critique. For it is nature that drives human (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  6. Feeling and Life in Kant’s Account of the Beautiful and the Sublime.Yoon H. Choi & Alix Cohen - 2021 - In Manja Kisner & Jörg Noller (eds.), The Concept of Drive in Classical German Philosophy: Between Biology, Anthropology, and Metaphysics. Palgrave-Macmillan. pp. 169-189.
    This chapter explores what Kant means by “life”, the “feeling of life”, the “feeling of the promotion of life”, and related notions, such as the idea of a “vital power”, through the contrast between Kant’s account of the beautiful and his account of the sublime. We argue that it is significant that Kant characterizes the feeling of the beautiful as a feeling of the promotion of life but the feeling of the sublime in terms of vital powers. We account for (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  7. Drive, Will, and Reason: Reinhold and Schiller on Realizing Freedom After Kant.Jörg Noller - 2021 - In Manja Kisner & Jörg Noller (eds.), The Concept of Drive in Classical German Philosophy: Between Biology, Anthropology, and Metaphysics. Palgrave-Macmillan. pp. 241-254.
    Karl Leonhard Reinhold’s and Friedrich Schiller’s conception of drive can be interpreted as a systematic response to an ambivalence in Kant’s conception of drive and driving force, which he associates with heteronomy and autonomy. Reinhold distinguishes between a selfish and an unselfish drive. In doing so, he revaluates the drive as something that is compatible with our freedom of the will. Both drives are the vital basis of our free decision and therefore united. Schiller distinguishes between three kinds of drive. (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  8. Kant on Driving Forces: Parallels and Differences in Kant’s Conceptualization of Trieb and Triebfeder.Manja Kisner - 2021 - In Manja Kisner & Jörg Noller (eds.), The Concept of Drive in Classical German Philosophy: Between Biology, Anthropology, and Metaphysics. Palgrave-Macmillan. pp. 127-148.
    The concept of Triebfeder, commonly translated into English as “incentive,” plays a crucial role in Kant’s moral philosophy. In the Critique of Practical Reason, in which a whole chapter is dedicated to the Triebfedern of pure practical reason, Kant argues that the moral law is not only the objective determining ground of the will but also functions as a Triebfeder, that is, as a subjective determining ground of the will. Kant’s concept of Trieb, by contrast, is much less clearly defined, (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  9. Kant and the Determinacy of Intuition.Jacob Browning - forthcoming - Wiley: European Journal of Philosophy.
    European Journal of Philosophy, EarlyView.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  10. Transcendental Knowability and A Priori Luminosity.Andrew Stephenson - forthcoming - History of Philosophy & Logical Analysis.
    This paper draws out and connects two neglected issues in Kant’s conception of a priori knowledge. Both concern topics that have been important to contemporary epistemology and to formal epistemology in particular: knowability and luminosity. Does Kant commit to some form of knowability principle according to which certain necessary truths are in principle knowable to beings like us? Does Kant commit to some form of luminosity principle according to which, if a subject knows a priori, then they can know that (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  11. Kant, I Think, and the Question of Self-Identification.Luca Forgione - 2021 - Studi Filosofici 44.
    The of aim of this paper is to enquire about some theoretical aspects of Kant’s philosophy that are connected to the representation ‘I’ and the question of self-identification in self-consciousness. The subjective capacity to represent itself through the representation ‘I’ will be articulated on the basis of the structure the so-called de se or I-thoughts developed by Perry and Recanati. In this regard, a contrast between Longuenesse’s view and my approach on self-identification and the different uses of I as subject (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  12. Mendelssohn and Kant on Virtue as a Skill.Melissa McBay Merritt - 2020 - In Ellen Fridland & Carlotta Pavese (eds.), Routledge Handbook of Skill and Expertise. Routledge. pp. 88-99.
    The idea that virtue can be profitably conceived as a certain sort of skill has a long history. My aim is to examine a neglected episode in this history — one that focuses on the pivotal role that Moses Mendelssohn played in rehabilitating the skill model of virtue for the German rationalist tradition, and Immanuel Kant’s subsequent, yet significantly qualified, endorsement of the idea. Mendelssohn celebrates a certain automatism in the execution of skill, and takes this feature to be instrumental (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  13. Перевод: Т. Розефельдт. Как быть реалистом относительно идеализма Канта?Marharyta Rouba - 2021 - Studies in Transcendental Philosophy 2 (1).
    Данный текст представляет собой перевод статьи Тобиаса Розефельдта (Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin) "Being Realistic about Kant’s Idealism", готовящейся к печати в сборнике "The Sensible and the Intelligible Worlds. New Essays on Kant’s Metaphysics and Epistemology" (ed. by K. Schafer, N. Stang. Oxford : Oxford University Press). Перевод выполнен мной в рамках научно-исследовательской стажировки в Берлинском университете им. братьев Гумбольдт.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  14. The Beach of Skepticism: Kant and Hume on the Practice of Philosophy and the Proper Bounds of Skepticism.Karl Schafer - forthcoming - In Peter Thielke (ed.), Cambridge Critical Guide to Kant’s Prolegomena. Cambridge: Cambridge. pp. 111-132.
    The focus of this chapter will be Kant’s understanding of Hume, and its impact on Kant’s critical philosophy. Contrary to the traditional reading of this relationship, which focuses on Kant’s (admittedly real) dissatisfaction with Hume’s account of causation, my discussion will focus on broader issues of philosophical methodology. Following a number of recent interpreters, I will argue that Kant sees Hume as raising, in a particularly forceful fashion, a ‘demarcation challenge’ concerning how to distinguish the legitimate use of reason in (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  15. The Science of the Soul and the Unyielding Architectonic: Kant Versus Wolff on the Foundations of Psychology.Michael Bennett McNulty - 2021 - In Saulo de Freitas Araujo, Thiago Constâncio Ribeiro Pereira & Thomas Sturm (eds.), The Force of an Idea: New Essays on Christian Wolff's Psychology. pp. 251–69.
    Thorough comparison of Immanuel Kant’s and Christian Wolff’s divergent appraisals of the science of psychology reveals various ways in which Kant fundamentally altered the Wolffian philosophical apparatus that he inherited. Wolff conceived of a thoroughgoing interplay between empirical and rational psychology, of combining different sorts of cognition in psychology, and of a mathematical science of the soul, or psychometrics. Kant however rejected each of these particular theses and deemed psychology to be no natural science, “properly so-called.” This chapter details these (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  16. On the Necessity of the Categories.Anil Gomes, Andrew Stephenson & A. W. Moore - 2022 - Philosophical Review 131 (2):129–168.
    For Kant, the human cognitive faculty has two sub-faculties: sensibility and the understanding. Each has pure forms which are necessary to us as humans: space and time for sensibility; the categories for the understanding. But Kant is careful to leave open the possibility of there being creatures like us, with both sensibility and understanding, who nevertheless have different pure forms of sensibility. They would be finite rational beings and discursive cognizers. But they would not be human. And this raises a (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  17. Transparency and Apperception.David Hunter, Thomas Land & Boris Hennig (eds.) - 2019 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy Special Issue.
  18. Fictionalism and Illusion: Comments on Chapter 5 of Kraus' Kant on Self-Knowledge and Self-Formation. [REVIEW]Corey W. Dyck - manuscript
    These comments are my contribution to the author-meets-critics session on Katharina Kraus' recently published Kant on Self-Knowledge and Self-Formation, at the APA Pacific meeting. In my comments, I challenge Kraus' characterization of my fictionalism concerning the idea of the soul, and contend for the importance of transcendental illusion in that idea's function of guiding the empirical investigation of inner appearances.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  19. The Universe of Science. The Architectonic Ideas of Science, Sciences and Their Parts in Kant.Michael Lewin - 2020 - Kantian Journal 39 (2):26-45.
    I argue that Kant has developed a broad systematic account of the architectonic functionality of pure reason that can be used and advanced in contemporary contexts. Reason, in the narrow sense, is responsible for the picture of a well-ordered universe of science consisting of architectonic ideas of science, sciences and parts of sciences. In the first section (I), I show what Kant means by the architectonic ideas by explaining and interrelating the concepts of (a) the faculty of reason, (b) ideas (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  20. Reason, ideas and their functions in classical German philosophy [in Russian] | Разум, идеи и их функции в классической немецкой философии.Michael Lewin - 2020 - Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Philosophy and Conflict Studies 36 (1):4-23.
    Over the last two decades there has been a growing interest in the transcendental dialectic of Critique of Pure Reason in Germany. Authors, however, often do not pay enough attention to the fact that Kant’s theory of reason (in the narrow sense) and the concept of ideas derived from it is not limited to this text. The purpose of this article is to compare and analyze the functionality of mind as a subjective ability developed by Kant and Fichte with the (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  21. On Kant’s Analysis of Berkeley.Gale Justin - 1974 - Kant Studien 65 (1-4).
  22. Hegel’s Critique of Kant’s Concept of Reason: The Problem of Different Demands.Michael Lewin - 2020 - Hegel Jahrbuch 2019 (1):146-153.
    I analyze the demands Hegel puts on the concept of reason in the first part of the Encyclopedia, which are of (1) epistemological, (2) functional and (3) methodological nature, and show how the critique of “subjective idealism” and Kant’s concept of reason emerges from them. Afterwards I outline two possible problems with Hegel’s demands and suggest that he overlooks the broad functional structure of the Kantian concept of reason as the faculty of principles.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  23. Invited Book Review of Paul Bishop’s Synchronicity and Intellectual Intuition in Kant, Swedenborg, and Jung (Lewiston, N.Y.: The Edwin Mellen Press, 2000). [REVIEW]Stephen R. Palmquist - 2004 - Journal of Scientific Exploration 18 (3):500-509.
  24. James R. O’Shea (Ed.), Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason: A Critical Guide Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2017 Pp. 297 ISBN 9781107074811 (Hbk) $99.99. [REVIEW]Andrew Jones - 2020 - Kantian Review 25 (2):317-321.
  25. Replies to the Comments of Paul Guyer and Andrew Chignell.Marcus Willaschek - 2020 - Kantian Review 25 (2):295-311.
  26. Alfredo Ferrarin, Thinking and the I: Hegel and the Critique of Kant Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 2019 Pp. 256ISBN: 9780810139381 (Pbk) $34.95. [REVIEW]Paul T. Wilford - 2020 - Kantian Review 25 (2):327-333.
  27. Kant’s Innovative Theory of Judgment and Cognition in the False Subtlety of Syllogistic Figures.Mihaela Vatavu - 2019 - Kant Studien 110 (4):527-553.
    Kant’s early work The False Subtlety of the Four Syllogistic Figures is typically considered a narrow, technical work still embedded in the tradition of Wolffian logic. I argue instead that it needs to be considered in light of Kant’s developing theory of cognition and his corresponding criticism of the Wolffian single faculty theory. Whereas the mature Kant criticizes the rationalists for misrepresenting the nature of sensibility, the urgent task facing him at this stage seems to have been a proper determination (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  28. Matthias Birrer: Kant und die Heterogenität der Erkenntnisquellen. Berlin/boston: De Gruyter, 2017. 327 Seiten. ISBN 978-3-11-054238-7.Kant und die Heterogenität der Erkenntnisquellen. [REVIEW]Reinhard Hiltscher - 2020 - Kant Studien 111 (1):139-145.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  29. Immanuel Kant: Die Einheit des Bewusstseins. Hrsg. von Giuseppe Motta und Udo Thiel. Kantstudien-Ergänzungshefte 197. Berlin/boston: Walter de Gruyter, 2017. VI, 284 Seiten. ISBN 978-3-11-055766-4.Immanuel Kant: Die Einheit des Bewusstseins. [REVIEW]Michael Pluder - 2020 - Kant Studien 111 (1):148-151.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  30. Sankarāchārya and Kantian Notion of Consciousness.Manas Kumar Sahu - forthcoming - Advaitya Utsav Conference.
    In this paper, my objective is to show how Sankarāchārya's concept of reality is deferent from the Kantian notion of reality, despite many similarities between them. Cartesian skepticism of universal doubt is a challenge for the Kantian notion of reality; however, it can't be applied to Sankarāchārya's concept of reality because of the acceptance of different paradigm to explain the reality and Sankarāchārya's non-representationalistic approach towards the reality. The attack on representationalism can't be applicable to Sankarāchārya's philosophy.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  31. Robert Hanna: Cognition, Content, and the A Priori. A Study in the Philosophy of Mind and Knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015. 464 Seiten. ISBN 978-0-19871629-7.Cognition, Content, and the A Priori. A Study in the Philosophy of Mind and Knowledge. [REVIEW]Reinhard Hiltscher - 2019 - Kant Studien 110 (2):303-307.
  32. Lucy Allais: Manifest Reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015. 329 Pp. ISBN 978-0-19-874713-0. Manifest Reality. [REVIEW]Jacinto Rivera de Rosales - 2019 - Kant Studien 110 (2):290-294.
  33. Béatrice Longuenesse: I, Me, Mine. Back to Kant, and Back Again. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017. XVIII, 257 Seiten. ISBN 978-0-19-966576-1.I, Me, Mine. Back to Kant, and Back Again. [REVIEW]Annett Wienmeister - 2019 - Kant Studien 110 (2):297-303.
    Name der Zeitschrift: Kant-Studien Jahrgang: 110 Heft: 2 Seiten: 297-303.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  34. Kant on Common-Sense and the Unity of Judgments of Taste.Samuel A. Stoner - 2019 - Kant Yearbook 11 (1):81-99.
    Though the notion of common-sense plays an important role in Kant’s aesthetic theory, it is not immediately clear what Kant means by this term. This essay works to clarify the role that common-sense plays in the logic of Kant’s argument. My interpretive hypothesis is that a careful examination of the way common-sense functions in Kant’s account of judgments of taste can help explain what this notion means. I argue that common-sense names the capacity to discern the relation between the cognitive (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  35. Die Zeit der Einbildungskraft - Die Rolle des Schematismus in Kants Erkenntnistheorie.Rainer Schäfer - 2019 - Kant Studien 110 (3):437-462.
    In this paper, I focus on Kant’s doctrine of figurative synthesis. Figurative synthesis is the result of the activity of productive transcendental imagination. This is the chief problem of the so-called “second proof step” in Kant’s deduction of the categories according to the second edition of the Critique of Pure Reason. The pure original synthetic apperception forms in the inner and outer sense - i. e. in time and space - by self-affection structures of order that make it possible to (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  36. Martin Bondeli: Kant Über Selbstaffektion. Basel: Colmena Verlag, 2018. 136 Seiten. ISBN: 978-3-906896-06-9.Kant Über Selbstaffektion.Jindřich Karásek - 2019 - Kant Studien 110 (3):512-515.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  37. Oxford Handbook of Kant.Andrew Stephenson & Anil Gomes (eds.) - forthcoming - Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  38. Martin Bondeli: Kant Über Selbstaffektion. Basel: Colmena Verlag, 2018. 136 Seiten. ISBN: 978-3-906896-06-9.Kant Über Selbstaffektion. [REVIEW]Jindřich Karásek - 2019 - Kant Studien 110 (3):512-515.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  39. Lucy Allais: Manifest Reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015. 329 Pp. ISBN 978-0-19-874713-0. Manifest Reality. [REVIEW]Jacinto Rivera de Rosales - 2019 - Kant Studien 110 (2):290-294.
    Name der Zeitschrift: Kant-Studien Jahrgang: 110 Heft: 2 Seiten: 290-294.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  40. Robert Hanna: Cognition, Content, and the A Priori. A Study in the Philosophy of Mind and Knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015. 464 Seiten. ISBN 978-0-19871629-7.Cognition, Content, and the A Priori. A Study in the Philosophy of Mind and Knowledge. [REVIEW]Reinhard Hiltscher - 2019 - Kant Studien 110 (2):303-307.
    Name der Zeitschrift: Kant-Studien Jahrgang: 110 Heft: 2 Seiten: 303-307.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  41. R. Lanier Anderson: The Poverty of Conceptual Truth. Kant’s Analytic/Synthetic Distinction and the Limits of Metaphysics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015. XVIII U. 408 Seiten. ISBN: 978-0-19872457-5. [REVIEW]Michael Pluder - 2019 - Kant Studien 110 (2):294-297.
    Name der Zeitschrift: Kant-Studien Jahrgang: 110 Heft: 2 Seiten: 294-297.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  42. Algunos comentarios sobre las dos ediciones de la ‘Crítica de la Razón Pura’ y su recepción en la fenomenología de Husserl.Stephanie Martinic Caneo - 2019 - Hybris, Revista de Filosofí­A 10 (1):197-216.
    En este artículo me propongo mostrar ciertos aspectos de la filosofía de Kant que podrían haber servido como antecedente a la elaboración de la fenomenología por parte de Husserl. Se toma para este respecto la Deducción de los conceptos puros del entendimiento como sistematización del criticismo kantiano, pero, además, por la controversia que las dos ediciones de la Crítica de la razón pura suscitan en torno a la imaginación en esta sección. Una vez expuesta esta parte de la Crítica en (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  43. The Parity and Disparity Between Inner and Outer Experience in Kant.Katharina Kraus - 2019 - Kantian Review 24 (2):171-195.
    This article advocates a new interpretation ofinner experience– the experience that one has of one’s empirical-psychological features ‘from within’ – in Kant. It argues that for Kant inner experience is the empirical cognition of mental states, but not that of a persistent mental substance. The schema of persistence is thereby substituted with the regulative idea of the soul. This view is shown to be superior to two opposed interpretations: the parity view that regards inner experience as empirical cognition of a (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  44. Kelly Sorensen and Diane Williamson , Kant and the Faculty of Feeling Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018 Pp. X + 276 ISBN: 9781107178229 £75.00. [REVIEW]Michael H. Walschots - 2019 - Kantian Review 24 (2):322-327.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  45. Kant: Constitutivism as Capacities-First Philosophy.Karl Schafer - 2019 - Philosophical Explorations 22 (2):177-193.
    Over the last two decades, Kant’s name has become closely associated with the “constitutivist” program within metaethics. But is Kant best read as pursuing a constitutivist approach to meta- normative questions? And if so, in what sense? In this essay, I’ll argue that we can best answer these questions by considering them in the context of a broader issue – namely, how Kant understands the proper methodology for philosophy in general. The result of this investigation will be that, while Kant (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  46. Perceptual Experience in Kant and Merleau-Ponty.Antich Peter - 2019 - Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 50 (3):220-233.
    I argue that the descriptions of perceptual experience offered by Kant and Merleau-Ponty are, contrary to what many commentators suppose, largely compatible. This is because the two are simply referring to different things when they talk about experience: Kant to empirical cognition and Merleau-Ponty to perception. Consequently, while Merleau-Ponty correctly denies that Kant accurately describes the conditions for the possibility of perception, Kant nevertheless provides a plausible account of the conditions of empirical judgment. Further, the two approach experience with different (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  47. Kant on de Se.Luca Forgione - 2018 - In Violetta Waibel, Margit Ruffing & David Wagner (eds.), Natur und Freiheit: Akten des XII. Internationalen Kant-Kongresses. Berlino, Germania: De Gruyter. pp. 3779-3786.
    Since the classic works by Castañeda, Perry and Lewis, de se thoughts have been described as thoughts about oneself ‘as oneself’. In recent years, various theoretical perspectives have gained ground, and even if the transcendental system does not seem to contemplate an explicit articulation of de se thoughts, apparently a few features of transcendental apperception and I think do anticipate a few points in Perry and Recanati’s claims on the so-called implicit de se thoughts in the specific terms of Transcendentalism.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  48. Yirmiyahu Yovel, Kant’s Philosophical Revolution: A Short Guide to the Critique of Pure Reason Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2018 Pp. X + 128 ISBN 9780681180526. [REVIEW]J. Colin McQuillan - 2019 - Kantian Review 24 (1):166-168.
  49. Kant and the Primacy of Judgment Before the First Critique.Patrick R. Leland - 2019 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 57 (2):281-312.
    Some claim Kant’s commitment to the explanatory priority of judgments over concepts is one of his most important contributions to the philosophy of mind. There is, however, extensive disagreement over the nature and extent of this commitment. Existing interpretations ignore a substantial body of textual evidence and offer no account of the origins of Kant’s view. This paper corrects for these deficiencies. I explain, first, the relevant accounts of concept possession Kant encountered in the writings of his predecessors; and, second, (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  50. Критика Кантом учения Декарта о cogito.Arsenii Khitrov - 2005 - In Форум молодых кантоведов (По материалам Международного конгресса, посвященного 280-летию со дня рождения и 200-летию со дня смерти Иммануила Канта). pp. 44–51.
1 — 50 / 2270