This category needs an editor. We encourage you to help if you are qualified.
Volunteer, or read more about what this involves.
Related categories

33 found
Order:
  1. Analysis, Language, and Concepts: The Second Paradox of Analysis.Felicia Ackerman - 1990 - Philosophical Perspectives 4:535-543.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  2. Comments on the Paradox of Analysis.Lennart Äqvist - 1962 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 5 (1-4):260-264.
    A version of the so?called paradox of analysis is enunciated which involves two principles of synonymy, referred to respectively as that of substitution and that of triviality. It is argued that for most ?familiar? concepts of synonymy the former principle can be maintained whereas the latter one has to be rejected. I deal with some solutions to the paradox that have been proposed or discussed by Carnap, Lewy, Feyerabend and Hare, and adhere to Carnap's view that the puzzle arises from (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  3. Intuitions About Disagreement Do Not Support the Normativity of Meaning.Derek Baker - 2016 - Dialectica 70 (1):65-84.
    Allan Gibbard () argues that the term ‘meaning’ expresses a normative concept, primarily on the basis of arguments that parallel Moore's famous Open Question Argument. In this paper I argue that Gibbard's evidence for normativity rests on idiosyncrasies of the Open Question Argument, and that when we use related thought experiments designed to bring out unusual semantic intuitions associated with normative terms we fail to find such evidence. These thought experiments, moreover, strongly suggest there are basic requirements for a theory (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  4. A Note on a Paradox of Analysis.Kenneth Barber - 1968 - Philosophical Studies 19 (3):37 - 43.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5. Remarks on Classical Analysis.George Bealer - 1983 - Journal of Philosophy 80 (11):711-712.
    Abstract of a paper to be presented in an APA symposium on Classical Analysis, December 30, 1983, commenting on a paper by Ernest Sosa.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  6. The "Paradox of Analysis" Again: A Reply.Max Black - 1945 - Mind 54 (215):272-273.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7. The "Paradox of Analysis".Max Black - 1944 - Mind 53 (211):263-267.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8. Context for Meaning and Analysis: A Critical Study in the Philosophy of Language.H. G. Callaway - 1993 - Rodopi.
    This book provides a concise overview, with excellent historical and systematic coverage, of the problems of the philosophy of language in the analytic tradition. Howard Callaway explains and explores the relation of language to the philosophy of mind and culture, to the theory of knowledge, and to ontology. He places the question of linguistic meaning at the center of his investigations. The teachings of authors who have become classics in the field, including Frege, Russell, Carnap, Quine, Davidson, and Putnam are (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9. The Paradox of Analysis: A Solution.RoderickM Chisholm & Richard C. Potter - 1981 - Metaphilosophy 12 (1):1-6.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  10. The Paradox of Analysis.Jeffrey Lamont Cobb - 1987 - Dissertation, Brown University
    Chapters 1-5 develop and criticize a solution to the paradox of analysis based on some recent work in the theory of reference and the analysis of propositional attitudes. This solution holds that the analysandum and analysans in a true analysis are the same property, and that sentences like: being a male sibling analyzes being a brother; and being a brother analyzes being a brother, express the same proposition. It holds that the property referent of "being a brother" and "being a (...)
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11. A Semantic Resolution of the Paradox of Analysis.Dennis Earl - 2007 - Acta Analytica 22 (3):189-205.
    The paradox of analysis has been a problem for analytic philosophers at least since Moore’s time, and it is especially significant for those who seek an account of analysis along classical lines. The present paper offers a new solution to the paradox, where a theory of analysis is given where (1) analysandum and analysans are distinct concepts, due to their failing to share the same conceptual form, yet (2) they are related in virtue of satisfying various semantic constraints on the (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  12. A Note on the Paradox of Analysis.P. K. Feyerabend - 1956 - Philosophical Studies 7 (6):92 - 96.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  13. The Paradox of Analysis.Richard A. Fumerton - 1983 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 43 (4):477-497.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  14. Equivalence: The Paradox of Theoretical Analysis.Norwood Russell Hanson - 1963 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 41 (2):217 – 232.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15. Salmon on Fregean Approaches to the Paradox of Analysis.Gary Kemp - 1995 - Philosophical Studies 78 (2):153 - 162.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  16. Comments on the Paradox of Analysis. Lennart - 1962 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 5 (1-4):260 – 264.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17. Some Notes on Carnap's Concept of Intensional Isomorphism and the Paradox of Analysis.Leonard Linsky - 1949 - Philosophy of Science 16 (4):343-347.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  18. ``The Paradox of the Preface".D. C. Makinson - 1965 - Analysis 25 (6):205-207.
  19. Moore's Paradox of Analysis.C. Mason Myers - 1971 - Metaphilosophy 2 (4):295–308.
    The nature of conceptual analysis is elucidated by a proposed solution to moore's paradox of analysis. Occurrent, Dispositional, And property concepts are distinguished, And the notion of epistemic gain is introduced and explained. It is shown that although a correct analysis equates property concepts this is done with epistemic gain. It is argued that in a correct analysis there must be no identity between analysans and analysandum in respect to occurrent concepts. The relevance of thought experiments to conceptual analysis is (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20. Frege and the Paradox of Analysis.Michael Nelson - 2008 - Philosophical Studies 137 (2):159-181.
    In an unpublished manuscript of 1914 titled ‘Logic in mathematics’, Gottlob Frege offered a rich account of the paradox of analysis. I argue that Frege there claims that the explicandum and explicans of a successful analysis express the same sense and that he furthermore appreciated that this requires that one cannot conclude that two sentences differ in sense simply because it is possible for a (minimally) competent speaker to accept one without accepting the other. I claim that this is shown (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  21. A Note on Analysis and Circular Definitions.Francesco Orilia & Achille C. Varzi - 1998 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 54:107-113.
    Analyses, in the simplest form assertions that aim to capture an intimate link between two concepts, are viewed since Russell's theory of definite descriptions as analyzing descriptions. Analysis therefore has to obey the laws governing definitions including some form of a Substitutivity Principle (SP). Once (SP) is accepted the road to the paradox of analysis is open. Popular reactions to the paradox involve the fundamental assumption (SV) that sentences differing only in containing an analysandum resp. an analysans express the same (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  22. Truth Incorporated.Gurpreet Rattan - 2016 - Noûs 50 (2):227-258.
    What is the cognitive value of the concept of truth? What epistemic difference does the concept of truth make to those who grasp it? This paper employs a new perspective for thinking about the concept of truth and recent debates concerning it, organized around the question of the cognitive value of the concept of truth. The paper aims to defend a substantively correct and dialectically optimal account of the cognitive value of the concept of truth. This perspective is employed in (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  23. Epistemological Semantics Beyond Irrationality and Conceptual Change.Gurpreet Rattan - 2014 - Journal of Philosophy 111 (12):667-688.
    Quine’s arguments in the final two sections of “Two Dogmas of Empiricism” bring semantic and epistemic concerns into spectacular collision. Many have thought that the arguments succeed in irreparably smashing a conception of a distinctively analytic and a priori philosophy to pieces. In Constructing the World, David Chalmers argues that much of this distinctively analytical and a priori conception of philosophy can be reconstructed, with Quine’s criticisms leaving little lasting damage. I agree with Chalmers that Quine’s arguments do not have (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  24. Shaw Arms and The Man - Academia.Edu.Rituparna Ray Chaudhuri - 2015
    "The theory of Darwin was improved upon by Lamarck. He laid down the principle that living organisms change because they want to. Lamarck , while making this statement, actually, introduced the Element of Mind in the universe. He observed that every cell or unit of life has a will, a purpose, a design and a hope. In other words, he came to the conclusion that everything has a soul. In this regard, there was a sort of conflict between the believers (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25. The Way I Upheld 'Macbeth'.Rituparna Ray Chaudhuri - 2015
    'When Macbeth comes from the murder of Duncan, his hands are covered in King's blood; he looks at them, and feels that all the waters in the ocean cannot wash away the blood, but that- "this my hand will rather The multitudinous seas incarnadine, Making the green one red.,"... -/- (http://philpapers.org/profile/112741 ).
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26. The Paradoxes of Analysis and Synonymy.S. D. Rieber - 1994 - Erkenntnis 41 (1):103 - 116.
    The very idea of informative analysis gives rise to a well-known paradox. Yet a parallel puzzle, herein called the paradox of synonymy, arises for statements which do not express analyses. The paradox of synonymy has a straightforward metalinguistic solution: certain words are referring to themselves. Likewise, the paradox of analysis can be solved by recognizing that certain expressions in an analysis statement are referring to their own semantic structures.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  27. The Paradox of Analysis: A Solution.Richard C. Potter Roderickm Chisholm - 1981 - Metaphilosophy 12 (1):1-6.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28. Kant, Analyticity, and the Paradox of Analysis. Schick - 1986 - Idealistic Studies 16 (2):125-131.
  29. Gestalt Qualities and the Paradox of Analysis.Wilfrid Sellars - 1950 - Philosophical Studies 1 (6):92 - 94.
  30. The Identity of Linguistic Expressions and the Paradox of Analysis.Wilfrid Sellars - 1950 - Philosophical Studies 1 (2):24 - 31.
  31. A Propositional Logic with Relative Identity Connective and a Partial Solution to the Paradox of Analysis.Xuefeng Wen - 2007 - Studia Logica 85 (2):251-260.
    We construct a a system PLRI which is the classical propositional logic supplied with a ternary construction , interpreted as the intensional identity of statements and in the context . PLRI is a refinement of Roman Suszko’s sentential calculus with identity (SCI) whose identity connective is a binary one. We provide a Hilbert-style axiomatization of this logic and prove its soundness and completeness with respect to some algebraic models. We also show that PLRI can be used to give a partial (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32. On the Church-Frege Solution of the Paradox of Analysis.Morton G. White - 1948 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 9 (2):305-308.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  33. A Note on the "Paradox of Analysis".Morton G. White - 1945 - Mind 54 (213):71-72.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography