About this topic
Summary

Phenomenalism is the view that physical reality is ultimately nothing more than a potential for conscious experience. Classically, the view is defined in terms of “sensation-conditionals”: counterfactual conditionals to the effect that experiences with certain phenomenal properties (qualia) would occur, if experiences with certain other qualia were to occur. Classic phenomenalism is a combination of two claims: (1) that for every physical state of affairs, there is some conjunction of sensation-conditionals whose truth logically entails the existence of that state of affairs, and, (2) that in order for a physical state of affairs to exist, it’s unnecessary for there to be anything (monads, God, noumena, or whatever) that makes the relevant sensation-conditionals true. It is the second claim that distinguishes phenomenalism from canonical idealism. 

Influential objections to (1) include (a) that the claimed entailment only seems to hold if the phenomenalist cheats by using conditionals whose antecedents refer to physical features of observers and their environments, (b) that the claimed entailment only seems to hold if the phenomenalist cheats by using conditionals that refer to physical time and space, (c) that the claimed entailment fails as a reduction, since we have to use physical vocabulary to characterize the relevant qualia, and, (d) that it’s impossible to give a plausible phenomenological analysis of imperceptible physical entities (like electrons).

Influential objections to (2) include (e) that the states of affairs described by counterfactual conditionals can’t be fundamental states of affairs, but must have some categorical basis, (f) that if nothing makes sensation-conditionals true, the most that their truth entails is the existence of a convincing appearance of physical reality, and, (g) that we have to posit truth-makers for sensation-conditionals, in order to account for the non-chaotic character of our experience. 

Key works Chapters 11 and 12 of Mill 1865 contain the original statement of the phenomenalist position. The first attempt to develop phenomenalism in detail is Carnap 1928 (for subsequent attempts, see Price 1932, Chapter 8 of Lewis 1946, and Pelczar 2015). Other sympathetic discussions include Ayer 1946 and Chapters 5 and 6 of Fumerton 1985. Important critical discussions include Chisholm 1948 (who raises objection [a]), Chapters 5 and 6 of Armstrong 1961 (who raises objections [b], [d], and [e]), Chapter 3 of Sellars 1963 (who raises objections [a], [b], and [c]), Chapter 2 of Smart 1963 (who raises objections [a], [d], [e], and [g]), and Mackie 1969 (who raises objections [f] and [g]).
Introductions Richard Fumerton's entry for phenomenalism in the Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy is a good place to start (for a more detailed discussion along the same lines, see Chapters 5 and 6 of Fumerton 1985). Armstrong 1961 and Smart 1963 summarize most of the main objections to phenomenalism in a concise and accessible way. 
  Show all references
Related categories
Siblings:
83 found
Search inside:
(import / add options)   Order:
1 — 50 / 83
  1. R. I. Aaron (1939). IX.—How May Phenomenalism Be Refuted? Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 39 (1):167-184.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2. R. I. Aaron (1938). How May Phenomenalism Be Refuted? Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 39:167 - 184.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3. E. M. Adams (1959). The Inadequacy of Phenomenalism. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 20 (1):93-102.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4. Robert Merrihew Adams (1983). Phenomenalism and Corporeal Substance in Leibniz. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 8 (1):217-257.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  5. Leslie Allan, The Existence of Mind-Independent Physical Objects.
    The author challenges both the eliminative idealist's contention that physical objects do not exist and the phenomenalist idealist's view that statements about physical objects are translatable into statements about private mental experiences. Firstly, he details how phenomenalist translations are parasitic on the realist assumption that physical objects exist independently of experience. Secondly, the author confronts eliminative idealism head on by exposing its heuristic sterility in contrast with realism's predictive success.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6. Richard E. Aquila (1975). Kant's Phenomenalism. Idealistic Studies 5 (2):108-126.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  7. David M. Armstrong (1961). Perception And The Physical World. Humanities Press.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   41 citations  
  8. A. J. Ayer (1947). IX.—Phenomenalism. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 47 (1):163-196.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9. A. J. Ayer (1946). Phenomenalism. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 47:163 - 196.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  10. E. Barkin (2003). Relative Phenomenalism - Toward a More Plausible Theory of Mind. Journal of Consciousness Studies 10 (8):3-13.
    Most philosophers believe that qualitative states must be explained in terms of physical states of the brain in order to resolve the mind/ body problem. But the severe difficulties involved in deriving the mental from the physical or, even more bizarrely, eliminating the mental altogether, have caused some to seriously investigate Russell's longstanding ideas about the intrinsic nature of physical entities. The resulting microphenomenal approaches, however, are of necessity extremely vague and complicated. Consequently, a macrophenomenal theory of mind may well (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11. Monroe C. Beardsley (1942). Phenomenalism and Determinism. Journal of Philosophy 39 (26):711-717.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12. Helen Beebee & Julian Dodd (eds.) (2005). Truthmakers: The Contemporary Debate. Clarendon Press.
    This volume will be the starting point for future discussion and research.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   17 citations  
  13. M. Black (1939). Comments on a Recent Version of Phenomenalism. Analysis 7 (1):1 - 12.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14. John Bolender (1998). Factual Phenomenalism: A Supervenience Theory. Sorites 9 (9):16-31.
    Broadly speaking, phenomenalism is the position that physical facts depend upon sensory facts. Many have thought it to imply that physical statements are translatable into sensory statements. Not surprisingly, the impossibility of such translations led many to abandon phenomenalism in favor of materialism. But this was rash, for if phenomenalism is reformulated as the claim that physical facts supervene upon sensory facts, then translatability is no longer required. Given materialism's failure to account for subjective experience, there has been a revival (...)
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15. R. B. Braithwaite (1938). XIV.—Propositions About Material Objects. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 38 (1):269-290.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16. C. D. Broad (1915). VIII.—Phenomenalism. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 15 (1):227-251.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17. C. D. Broad (1914). Phenomenalism. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 15:227 - 251.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18. Gregory Brown (1987). God's Phenomena and the Pre-Established Harmony. Studia Leibnitiana 19 (2):200-214.
    In this paper I wish to examine the nature and role of "the phenomena of God" in Leinbiz's mature thought. In the first part of the paper, I discuss the nature of the universal harmony and argue that they are the perceptiual states of finite substances and the relations among them that constitute God's phenomena. In the second part of the paper, I attempt to specify the theoretical role that God's phenomena play in Leibniz's phenomenalism. This leads finally to a (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  19. Robert Brown & John Watling (1951). Hypothetical Statements in Phenomenalism. Synthese 8 (8/9):355 - 366.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20. Mario Bunge (2006). 2. Phenomena, Phenomenalism, and Science. In Chasing Reality: Strife Over Realism. University of Toronto Press. pp. 34-55.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21. Rudolf Carnap (1967). The Logical Structure of the World. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  22. Roderick M. Chisholm (1948). The Problem of Empiricism. Journal of Philosophy 45 (19):512-517.
  23. Mark Thomas Coppenger (1974). A Defense of Phenomenalism. Dissertation, Vanderbilt University
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24. James W. Cornman (1973). Theoretical Phenomenalism. Noûs 7 (2):120-138.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  25. J. W. Davis (1962). Berkeley and Phenomenalism. Dialogue 1 (1):67-80.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  26. Steven French & James Ladyman (2003). Between Platonism and Phenomenalism: Reply to Cao. Synthese 136 (1):73-78.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  27. Steven French & James Ladyman (2003). The Dissolution of Objects: Between Platonism and Phenomenalism. [REVIEW] Synthese 136 (1):73 - 77.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   21 citations  
  28. Richard Fumerton (1998). Phenomenalism (Encyclopedia Entry). Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29. Richard A. Fumerton (1985). Metaphysical And Epistemological Problems Of Perception. Lincoln: University Nebraska Press.
  30. Richard Anthony Fumerton (1974). Phenomenalism. Dissertation, Brown University
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31. Montgomery Furth (1967). Monadology. Philosophical Review 76 (2):169-200.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  32. Robert L. Greenwood (1985). C.I. Lewis and the Issue of Phenomenalism. Philosophy Research Archives 11:441-452.
    According to the received view, the philosophy of C.I. Lewis is a form of phenomenalism. The first part of this paper is an argument designed to show that Lewis does not support one of the necessary conditions for ontological phenomenalism; namely, the sense-datum theory. The secondpart is an argument designed to show that Lewis’ theory is incompatible with linguistic phenomenalism, a view according to which there is an equivalence of meaning between physical object statements and sense-data statements. The argument is (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33. Andy Hamilton (1998). Mill, Phenomenalism, and the Self. In John Skorupski (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Mill. Cambridge University Press. pp. 139--75.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34. W. F. R. Hardie (1946). VI.—The Paradox of Phenomenalism. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 46 (1):127-154.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35. W. F. R. Hardie (1945). The Paradox of Phenomenalism. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 46:127 - 154.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  36. Alan Hobbs (1975). New Phenomenalism as an Account of Perceptual Knowledge. Royal Institute of Philosophy Lectures 9:109-121.
    To be an Empiricist with respect to knowledge of the natural world, is to insist that all knowledge of that world is rooted in perceptual experience. All claims which go beyond the deliverances of the senses must, in the end, be justified by, and understood in terms of, relations holding between those claims and sensory data. Crucial to the Empiricist case, therefore, is an account of how perception can be a source of knowledge. How can sensory experiences provide, for the (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37. David Hume (1739/2000). A Treatise of Human Nature. Oxford University Press.
    A Treatise of Human Nature (1739-40), David Hume's comprehensive attempt to base philosophy on a new, observationally grounded study of human nature, is one of the most important texts in Western philosophy. It is also the focal point of current attempts to understand 18th-century philosophy. -/- The Treatise first explains how we form such concepts as cause and effect, external existence, and personal identity, and to form compelling but unconfirmable beliefs in the entities represented by these concepts. It then offers (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   766 citations  
  38. Takeo Iwasaki (1974). A Criticism of Phenomenalism. Revue Internationale de Philosophie 28 (1/2=107/108):116.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39. Vladimir Jankélévitch (1959). Le Je-Ne-Sais-Quol Et le Presque-Rien. Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 15 (2):216-217.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40. Nicholas Jolley (1986). Leibniz and Phenomenalism. Studia Leibnitiana 18 (1):38-51.
    Leibniz est-il devenu phénoménaliste pendant ses années dernières ? Contre Furth et Loeb, ce travail rend une réponse négative à cette question. Quoique Leibniz a caressé les idées phénoménalistes, il ne les a jamais vraiment acceptées ; au contraire, il soutient une autre thèse réductioniste, c'est-à-dire que les corps sont des agrégats des monades. Cependant, cette conclusion entraîne ses propres difficultés, car à certains égards, la doctrine phénoménaliste paraît plus satisfaisante que l'option concurrante. On soutient que la répugnance leibnizienne à (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  41. T. Z. Lavine (1981). C. I. Lewis and the Problem of Phenomenalism. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 41 (3):386-395.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42. Geoffrey Lee (2016). Worlds, Voyages and Experiences: Commentary on Pelczar’s Sensorama. [REVIEW] Analysis 76 (4):453-461.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43. C. I. Lewis (1955). Realism or Phenomenalism? Philosophical Review 64 (2):233-247.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  44. C. I. Lewis (1946). An Analysis of Knowledge and Valuation. Open Court.
    We are republishing these classic works in affordable, high quality, modern editions, using the original text and artwork.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   109 citations  
  45. David Liggins (2005). Truthmakers and Explanation. In Helen Beebee & Julian Dodd (eds.), Truthmakers: The Contemporary Debate. Clarendon Press. pp. 105--115.
    Truthmaker theory promises to do some useful philosophical work: equipping us to argue against phenomenalism and Rylean behaviourism, for instance, and helping us decide what exists (Lewis 1999, 207; Armstrong 1997, 113-119). But it has proved hard to formulate a truthmaker theory that is both useful and believable. I want to suggest that a neglected approach to truthmakers – that of Ian McFetridge – can surmount some of the problems that make other theories of truthmaking unattractive. To begin with, I’ll (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   12 citations  
  46. J. L. Mackie (1969). What's Really Wrong with Phenomenalism? Proceedings of the British Academy 55:113-127.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47. D. G. C. Macnabb (1941). IV.—Phenomenalism. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 41 (1):67-90.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48. D. G. C. Macnabb (1940). Phenomenalism. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 41:67 - 90.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49. J. P. McKinney (1959). Phenomenalism: A Survey and Reassessment. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 37 (3):221 – 233.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50. Robert McRae (1948). Phenomenalism and J. S. Mill's Theory of Causation. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 9 (2):237-250.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 83