Summary |
Phenomenalism is the view that physical reality is
ultimately nothing more than a potential for conscious experience. Classically,
the view is defined in terms of “sensation-conditionals”: counterfactual conditionals
to the effect that experiences with certain phenomenal properties (qualia)
would occur, if experiences with certain other qualia were to occur. Classic phenomenalism
is a combination of two claims: (1) that for every physical state of affairs,
there is some conjunction of sensation-conditionals whose truth logically entails
the existence of that state of affairs, and, (2) that in order for a physical state
of affairs to exist, it’s unnecessary for there to be anything (monads, God,
noumena, or whatever) that makes the relevant sensation-conditionals true. It
is the second claim that distinguishes phenomenalism from canonical idealism. Influential objections to (1) include (a) that the claimed
entailment only seems to hold if the phenomenalist cheats by using conditionals
whose antecedents refer to physical features of observers and their
environments, (b) that the claimed entailment only seems to hold if the
phenomenalist cheats by using conditionals that refer to physical time and
space, (c) that the claimed entailment fails as a reduction, since we have to
use physical vocabulary to characterize the relevant qualia, and, (d) that it’s
impossible to give a plausible phenomenological analysis of imperceptible physical
entities (like electrons).
Influential objections to (2) include (e) that the states of
affairs described by counterfactual conditionals can’t be fundamental states of
affairs, but must have some categorical basis, (f) that if nothing makes sensation-conditionals
true, the most that their truth entails is the existence of a convincing appearance
of physical reality, and, (g) that we have to posit truth-makers for
sensation-conditionals, in order to account for the non-chaotic character of
our experience. |