Philosophy of Sexuality

I contrast a liberal and a conservative approach to the morality of sex, endorsing the former with a concession as to the special nature of sex, and note Pruss’ philosophical and theological endorsement of the latter. I criticize his argumentative strategy in three regards: first, he defends Christian love as equivalent to benevolence; second, he allows for only a moral evaluation of sex; third, he moves too quickly from some factual claims to others, and thence to normative conclusions. His account (...) of the moral impermissibility of non-veridical pleasures trades on ambiguities in ‘real’ pleasure.I respond to three arguments Pruss offers against IVF : gamete donors can discharge their parental obligations; reproduction need not only be by coitus; and those who use fertility treatment need not thereby do wrong in treating any resultant child as an ‘artefact’.I conclude with critical observations about the distance between Pruss’ views and those commonly held by most people, including increasing numbers of Catholics. (shrink)

This article considers the transgressive and transformative possibilities in the sexual silences of the U.K.’s Civil Partnership Act 2004. The absence of a consummation requirement and adultery as a specific ground of dissolution do open up some possibilities but are not unproblematic. These issues are explored in the context of the England and Wales Law Commission’s apparent ‘return’ to a conjugal model in its forthcoming consultation on cohabitation. It is concluded that though the Act may open up possibilities for expanding (...) the legal recognition of relationships beyond those that are sexual, this raises concerns about the further privatisation of care as well as increased state intervention in relationships. Instead, I argue that the purpose and function of relationship recognition should be deconstructed and separated from ideology and romantic mythology about what families and relationships are and should be. If it does wed itself so closely to the conjugal marriage model in the consultation document, the Law Commission will miss a valuable opportunity to ask important questions about the purpose and function of relationship recognition. (shrink)

Alex Pruss argues that romantic love is a basic form of human love that is properly fulfilled in sex oriented towards reproduction. As a result, homoerotic sexual activity cannot obtain the proper consummation and therefore involves misunderstanding the other person’s nature and the possibility of union with them. Although same-sex sexual activity may feel like a consummation of romantic love, it is wrong to generate such a false experience in oneself or another. Presented is an apparent dilemma for Pruss’s thesis (...) suggesting that either both postmenopausal homosexuals and postmenopausal heterosexuals ought to be allowed to marry for their romantic love is not dysfunctional despite not being oriented towards reproduction, or that matrimony is inappropriate for both groups. I suggest avoiding the dilemma in either of two ways that would allow Pruss to distinguish the infertility of homosexual couples from the infertility of post-menopausal women. (shrink)

In recent years, philosophers and political theorists began to treat sex as a serious intellectual topic. Though their work involves broad disciplinary and theoretical differences, it is in all cases characterized by a conception of sexual motivation. That is the topic I attempt to pursue here. Toward that end, I examine the behavioral specifications that analytic philosophers have given for states of 'sexual desire' ; I inquire into the problems of consciousness that phenomenologists have thought 'sexual desire' to entail ; (...) I survey the attempts of moral philosophers to account for the moral dimension of sexual experience ; I examine the psychoanalytic attempt to isolate the emotional basis of 'sexual desire', and to account for the sorts of emotional conflict often given sexual expression . I give particular attention to feminist views of sexuality , and to political views of the liberating and/or repressive character of sexual experience . ;I offer two main arguments: Concerning the definition of sexuality, I argue that 'sexual desire' is neither a glanduar, bodily phenomenon nor a matter of social relations, but is best thought of as a subjunctive sort of desire, a desire in which bodily and social aims are mixed, and often distorted. Concerning the political significance of sexuality, I argue that political thinking about sexuality is unduly limited by contraints which derive from the work of Marx and Freud: Sexuality tends to be seen as either a model for communal relations or as a dangerous energy, best repressed. Neither view seems sufficient on its own. If there is to be a political theory of sex that will support a sexual politics, it must be a theory that maintains a critical perspective upon the psychologically ambivalent character of sexuality, while at the same time allowing for the possible reinvention of sexuality. Though no such theory has yet been advanced, this essay is intended as a step in that direction. (shrink)

The various kinds and conditions of love are a common theme for Kierkegaard, beginning with his early Either/Or, through "The Diary of the Seducer" and Judge William's eulogy on married love, to his last work, on the changelessness of God's love. Works of Love, the midpoint in the series, is also the monumental high point, because of its penetrating, illuminating analysis of the forms and sources of love. Love as feeling and mood is distinguished from works of love, love of (...) the lovable from love of the unlovely, preferential love from love as the royal law, love as mutual egotism from triangular love, and erotic love from self-giving love.This work is marked by Kierkegaard's Socratic awareness of the reader, both as the center of awakened understanding and as the initiator of action. Written to be read aloud, the book conveys a keenness of thought and an insightful, poetic imagination that make such an attentive approach richly rewarding. Works of Love not only serves as an excellent place to begin exploring the writings of Kierkegaard, but also rewards many rereadings. (shrink)

Responsibility, Complexity, and Abortion: Toward a New Image of Ethical Thought draws from feminist theory, post-structuralist theory, and complexity theory to develop a new set of ethical concepts for broaching the thinking challenges that attend the experience of unwanted pregnancy.

This Product Demonstrating Excellence illustrates the ancient Chinese philosophy of Taoism, a Spiritual, philosophical, psychological body of wisdom and knowledge, a way to understand the conditioned self, the True Self, and marital intimacy. Fulfilling and lasting marriage requires the interdependence of two authentic people. Only through encountering and confronting the psycho-social and cultural obstacles within oneself and those affecting the relationship can contemporary marriages be improved. A contextual essay covering methodology, interpretation and other issues begins the document. An introduction follows (...) discussing problematic psychological precursors as motives for marrying, the problem of family disintegration and the suffering that results, lack of self-understanding and capacity for intimate relationship. Also discussed will be the high level of authenticity and integrity required for finding existential meaning in life. ;The goal of the PDE is to apply Taoist wisdom to the process of self-realization and marital intimacy actualization. The author attempts to provide a vision for integrating and applying these perspectives to enhance personal understanding and growth and, therefore, marital intimacy. The text provides a prospective path for repairing personal and relational difficulties through an understanding of an early philosophical Taoist perspective. ;Part One of the PDE, a critical essay, explores the bases of, manifestation of, and effects of true authenticity on one's life and the quality of one's relationships philosophically, psychologically, and Spiritually by drawing upon Taoist philosophy. It also examines particular perspectives of Western existential humanist philosophy and psychology from psychoanalytic and systemic perspectives, and Spiritual Humanism. A literature review continues through remaining chapters exploring personal meaning, authenticity, intimacy, Taoist cosmological and ontological perspectives. ;Part Two, The Tao of Self in Marriage, a creative project, covers forty of the Tao Teh Ching chapters from the interpretations of various scholars. At times the author has re-interpreted them in consonance with the purposes stated above. Reflections follow, including relevant poetry written by the author and selections from other literary sources. (shrink)

One argument Robert and Baylis do not raise in their article on the creation of interspecies chimeras using human cellular material is that the creation of these chimeras would, or could, offend human dignity. Yet, human dignity is one of the most common concerns raised in public debates, academic arguments, and policy documents regarding biotechnology in general, and the creation animal-human chimeras in particular. … The concept is ill-defined within bioethics and … risks being dismissed as meaningless or uselessly vague. (...) However, this lack of definition should not yet cause us to abandon or ignore human dignity. At least in arguments about creating chimeras, an examination of what may be meant by appeals to human dignity can uncover important concerns or arguments that are not captured by other formulations of the debate. (shrink)

This essay is about liberal and conservative views of marriage. I'll begin by mentioning that I would really, really like to avoid use of the terms ‘liberal’ and ‘conservative’, but when push comes to shove, I know of no better labels for the positions that will be discussed in what follows. I would like to avoid these labels for a simple reason: many people strongly self-identify as liberals or as conservatives, and this can undermine our ability to investigate the topic (...) in a sane, rational way. Politics, at least in the contemporary English-speaking world, functions a lot like the world of sports. Many people have a particular team to which their allegiance has been pledged, and the team's successes and failures on the field are shared in the hearts and minds of its loyal followers. In my own case – and here, I ask for your pity – I am a fan of the National Football League's Cleveland Browns. As much as I might wish things were otherwise, I rejoice in the Browns' triumphs and suffer when they lose. I do not wait to see what happens in the game before I decide which team to cheer for; if it's an NFL game, and I see orange and brown, I know where my allegiance lies. Furthermore, I identify with my fellow Browns fans in a way that I cannot identify with followers of, say, the Pittsburgh Steelers. Clevelanders are my people. We share something, and what we share unites us in opposition to Steeler Nation. Their victories are our defeats. It is a zero-sum game: for one of us to win, the other must lose. (shrink)

A sample of 871 currently married urban Bangladeshi women was used to assess the impact of mass media family planning programmes on current contraceptive use. The analyses suggested that radio had been playing a significant role in spreading family planning messages among eligible clients; 38% of women with access to a radio had heard of family planning messages while the figures for TV and newspaper were 18·5% and 8·5% respectively. Education, number of living children and current contraceptive use were important (...) predictors of exposure to any mass media family planning messages. There was a negative relationship between breast-feeding and the current use of contraception indicating a low need for contraception among women who were breast-feeding. (shrink)

Sexual Justice defends a robust a robust conception of lesbian and gay rights, emphasizing protection against discrimination and recognition of queer relationships and families. Synthesizing materials from law, philosophy, psychoanalysis and literature, Kaplan argues that sexual desire is central to the pursuit of happiness: equal citizenship requires individual freedom to shape oneself through a variety of intimate associations.

Marital and family structures, together with the closely related areas of gender relations and attitudes to sexuality, constitute one area in which scholars have suggested medieval England clearly differs from other regions. It is always difficult to compare across regions when the nature of the evidence differs; but because marriage and sexual behavior were under the jurisdiction of the church courts and because the ecclesiastical court system used the same set of legal rules across Europe, one level of difficulty disappears (...) from a comparison. Records from different regions reflect somewhat different procedures or penalties, based on local synodal statutes, but are more commensurable than records of the secular courts, which did not depend on a common set of rules. Basic principles of canon law were universally accepted in western Christendom: marriage was formed by the consent of the parties; marital promises followed by sexual intercourse created an indissoluble marriage; and any extramarital sexual activity by either a husband or a wife was adultery. An examination of church court records from late-medieval Paris compared with better-known records from England suggests that differences between England and northern France in the understanding of sexual behavior and the formation of unions, while they reflect different approaches, were still addressing fundamentally the same issues, and the demographic patterns may not have been as different as scholars have assumed. (shrink)