This category needs an editor. We encourage you to help if you are qualified.
Volunteer, or read more about what this involves.
Related categories

51 found
Order:
1 — 50 / 51
  1. Wittgenstein and Physicalism.Joseph Agassi - 1991 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 41:67-97.
    In the light of a sketch of the history of modem Anti-Metaphysics up from Francis Bacon Wittgenstein's position - the refusal of the possibility of metaphysical assertions - is compared with the views of Mach, of Camap and Neurath and of Popper. Analysing the notions of 'nonsense', 'meaninglessness' and 'Scheinproblem', their interrelations and connections to physicalism three variants of Anti-Metaphysics are distinguished: the Enlightenment view, the positivistMachian view and the linguistic Wittgensteinian view. The present day actuality of these views is (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2. Brightman and Popper on the Emergence of the Person: Implications for the Abortion Issue.Joe Barnhart - 2006 - The Pluralist 1 (2):57 - 67.
  3. John C. Eccles.Can Materialism Be - 1976 - In G. Gordon, Grover Maxwell & I. Savodnik (eds.), Consciousness and the Brain: A Scientific and Philosophical Inquiry. Plenum.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4. Consciousness and Complexity: Evolutionary Perspectives on the Mind-Body Problem.William P. Bechtel & Robert C. Richardson - 1983 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 61 (4):378-95.
    (1983). Consciousness and complexity: Evolutionary perspectives on the mind-body problem. Australasian Journal of Philosophy: Vol. 61, No. 4, pp. 378-395.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5. Knowledge and the Body-Mind Problem & the Myth of the Framework by Karl Popper.Michael Ben-Chaim - 1998 - Philosophia 26 (3-4):529-544.
  6. Review: Karl Popper. The Myth of the Framework. Knowledge and the Body-Mind Problem. [REVIEW]A. Bird - 1996 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 47 (1):149-151.
  7. Popper's Critique of Panpsychism and Process Proto-Mentalism.Andrew G. Bjelland - 1982 - Modern Schoolman 59 (May):233-43.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8. Taking Popper Seriously.Michael Bradie - 1996 - Biology and Philosophy 11 (2):259-270.
  9. Review of John C. Eccles's How the Self Controls Its Brain. [REVIEW]Manuel Bremer - 1998 - Sorites 9:56-59.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10. Eccles-Iastical Dualism: Review of Evolution of the Brain: Creation of the Self by John Eccles. [REVIEW]Selmer Bringsjord & Joseph Daraio - 1999 - PSYCHE: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Research On Consciousness 5.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11. Popper Et le Problème du Corps Et de L’'Me.Thomas Chabin - 2007 - Philosophia Scientae 11:159-193.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12. POPPER, K. R. And ECCLES, J. C. "The Self and its Brain". [REVIEW]L. J. Cohen - 1979 - Mind 88:301.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13. Reflections on the Interactionist Dualism of Karl Popper.R. Corvi - 1997 - Rivista di Filosofia Neo-Scolastica 89 (2-3):338-354.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14. The Self and Its Brain: An Argument for Interactionism by Karl R. Popper and John C. Eccles. [REVIEW]Daniel C. Dennett - 1979 - Journal of Philosophy 76 (2):91-97.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  15. Concevoir l'esprit comme une force : l'hypothèse métaphysique de Karl Popper.Joël Dolbeault - 2013 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 138 (4):505-526.
    Au sujet de la relation esprit-corps, Popper rejette le physicalisme, défini par le principe de clôture causale du domaine physique, et tente de construire une hypothèse interactionniste en accord avec la science contemporaine. Plus précisément, Popper reproche aux formes les plus élaborées du physicalisme d'entrer en contradiction avec la théorie de l'évolution, ainsi qu'avec le rationalisme. À l'opposé, il considère que l'hypothèse interactionniste peut se nourrir d'une comparaison minutieuse entre l'esprit et les forces physiques. Cette comparaison tend à rapprocher Popper (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16. Popper and Eccles' Psychophysical Interaction Theses Examined.Rodney J. Douglas & Bernard P. Keaney - 1985 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 23:129-153.
    Popper and Eccles present two different notions of Interactionism. Popper's arguments arise out of the traditional philosophical debate, whereas Eccles' arguments arise out of a mixture of neurophysiology and personal belief. Popper's three-world ontology is the philosophical foundation of both their positions. However, it is precisely against the background of the three Worlds that the considerable differences between their positions are apparent. Despite these defects, Interactionism is a productive notion since it does not place the Self beyond experimental investigation. Indeed, (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17. Sir John Eccles in Memoriam a Tireless Warrior for Dualism.Helena Eccles & H. J. Biersack - 2000
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18. The Human Psyche.John C. Eccles - 1980 - Berlin: Springer.
    The Human Psyche is an in-depth exploration of dualist-interactionism, a concept Sir John Eccles developed with Sir Karl Popper in the context of a wide...
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   147 citations  
  19. ECCLES, JOHN C. The Human Psyche. [REVIEW]J. M. Hinton - 1982 - Philosophy 57:137.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20. The Human Psyche By John C. Eccles Springer International, 1980, Xv+278 Pp., US £26.00. [REVIEW]J. M. Hinton - 1982 - Philosophy 57 (219):137-.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21. How to Keep Fit, Lects., by W. Mca. Eccles [and Others].William Mcadam How & Eccles - 1914
  22. Interactionism Revived?Frank Jackson - 1980 - Philosophy of Social Science 10 (September):316-23.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  23. Consciousness-Poppers Contribution.Roger James - 1995 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 2 (2):188-190.
    Popper, who was 92 when he died on 17 September 1994, was widely acclaimed as the greatest philosopher of science and by many as the greatest philosopher of any kind of the twentieth century. His most outstanding achievement was probably his solving of the age-old problem of induction . He showed that there is no such thing. Induction does not exist. Hume in his Treatise of Human Nature, 1739, had succeeeded in proving that experience and reason have no necessary connection (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  24. Popper and the Evolution of Consciousness.K. Jones - 1987 - Philosophical Studies 31:176-182.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25. Objective Knowledge Out of Ignorance: Popper on Body, Mind, and the Third World.Herbert Keuth - 1974 - Theory and Decision 5 (4):391-412.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26. Déterminisme Et Liberté. Nouvelle Position d'Un Ancien Problème: Le Modèle de Popper.Jean Ladrière - 1967 - Revue Philosophique De Louvain 65 (88):467-496.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27. Mind as a Force Field: Comments on a New Interactionistic Hypothesis.B. I. B. Lindahl & P. Århem - 1994 - Journal of Theoretical Biology 171:111-22.
    The survival and development of consciousness in biological evolution call for an explanation. An interactionistic mind-brain theory seems to have the greatest explanatory value in this context. An interpretation of an interactionistic hypothesis, recently proposed by Karl Popper, is discussed both theoretically and based on recent experimental data. In the interpretation, the distinction between the conscious mind and the brain is seen as a division into what is subjective and what is objective, and not as an ontological distinction between something (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28. Karl R. Popper and John C. Eccles's "The Self and its Brain". [REVIEW]Ruth Macklin - 1979 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 40 (2):290.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29. Causal Emergentism.Olga Markič - 2004 - Acta Analytica 19 (33):65-81.
    In this paper I describe basic features of traditional (British) emergentism and Popper’s emergentist theory of consciousness and compare them to the contemporary versions of emergentism present in connectionist approach in cognitive sciences. I argue that despite their similarities, the traditional form, as well as Popper’s theory belong to strong causal emergentism and yield radically different ontological consequences compared to the weaker, contemporary version present in cognitive science. Strong causal emergentism denies the causal closure of the physical domain and introduces (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30. John Carew Eccles, un neurocientífico en busca del alma: Una aproximación bibliográfica.Alberto Gutiérrez Martínez - 2005 - Ciudad de Dios: Revista Agustiniana 218 (1):145-158.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31. POPPER, K. R. And ECCLES, J. C.: "The Self and its Brain". [REVIEW]C. Mortensen - 1978 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 56:264.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  32. Epiphenomenalism and Machines: A Discussion of Van Rooijen's Critique of Popper.Davor Pećnjak - 1989 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 40 (3):404-408.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (11 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33. Natural Selection and the Emergence of Mind.Karl Popper - 1978 - Dialectica 32 (3‐4):339-55.
  34. Language and the Body-Mind Problem.Karl Popper - 1953 - Proceedings of the XIth International Congress of Philosophy 7:101-107.
  35. Knowledge and the Body-Mind Problem: In Defence of Interaction.Karl R. Popper (ed.) - 1994 - Routledge.
    One of the most influential thinkers of the 20th century, Sir Karl Popper here examines the problems connected with human freedom, creativity, rationality and the relationship between human beings and their actions. In this illuminating series of papers, Popper suggests a theory of mind-body interaction that relates to evolutionary emergence, human language and what he calls "the three worlds." Rene; Descartes first posited the existence of two worlds--the world of physical bodies and the world of mental states. Popper argues for (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  36. A Note on the Body-Mind Problem.Karl R. Popper - 1954 - Analysis 15 (June):131-35.
  37. Language and the Body-Mind Problem: A Restatement of Interactionism.Karl R. Popper - 1953 - Proceedings of the XI International Congress of Philosophy 7:101-107.
    It is not a paper on linguistic analysis (the analysis of word-usages). For I completely reject the claim of certain language analysts that the source of philosophical difficulties is to be found in the misuse of language. No doubt some people talk nonsense, but I claim (a) that there does not exist a logical or language-analytical method of detecting philosophical nonsense (which, by the way, does not stop short of the ranks of logicians, language analysts and semanticists); (b) that the (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38. The Self and Its Brain: An Argument for Interactionism.Karl R. Popper & John C. Eccles - 1977 - Springer.
    Physical and chemical processes may act upon the mind; and when we are writing a difficult letter, our mind acts upon our body and, through a chain of physical...
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   475 citations  
  39. Review Symposium : Sir Karl Popper and Sir John Eccles. The Self and its Brain. New York: Springer Verlag, 1977. Pp. XVI + 597. $17.90. Unpacking Some Dualities Inherent in a Mind/Brain Dualism Karl H.Pribram Psychology, Stanford University. [REVIEW]Karl H. Pribram, Donald O. Hebb & Frank Jackson - 1980 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 10 (3):295-308.
  40. Popper and the Mind-Body Problem.Roland Puccetti - 1985 - In Gregory Currie & Alan Musgrave (eds.), Popper and the Human Sciences. Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 45--55.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41. Interactionism and Evolution: A Critique of Popper.Jeroen van Rooijen - 1987 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 38 (1):87-92.
  42. Interactionism and Evolution: A Critique of Popper.Jeroen Rooijevann - 1987 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 38 (1):87-92.
  43. A Review of Eccles' Arguments for Dualist-Interactionism. [REVIEW]Sven Rosenkranz - 1994 - In Ulla Wessels & Georg Meggle (eds.), Analyomen 1. Hawthorne: De Gruyter. pp. 689-694.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44. A Note on Popper's Argument for Dualism.Wilfrid S. Sellars - 1954 - Analysis 15 (October):23-24.
  45. Mind-Brain Interaction: Mentalism Yes, Dualism No.Roger W. Sperry - 1980 - Neuroscience 5 (2):195-206.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  46. "The Self and Its Brain: An Argument for Interactionism," by Karl R. Popper and John C. Eccles.George J. Stack - 1979 - Modern Schoolman 56 (3):269-276.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47. The Self and Its Brain: An Argument for Interactionism By Karl R. Popper and John C. Eccles Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1977, Xvi + 597 Pp., 66 Figs., £9.40. [REVIEW]Godfrey Vesey - 1979 - Philosophy 54 (208):249-.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48. POPPER, KARL R. And JOHN C. ECCLES "The Self and Its Brain: An Argument for Interactionism". [REVIEW]Godfrey Vesey - 1979 - Philosophy 54:249.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49. Popper, Karl and Eccles, John-the Question of the Body-Mind Relationship Between Philosophy and Science.A. Vigliani - 1983 - Filosofia 34 (2):87-144.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50. Reply to Popper's Attack on Epiphenomenalism.Gerhard D. Wassermann - 1979 - Mind 88 (October):572-75.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   28 citations  
1 — 50 / 51