This category needs an editor. We encourage you to help if you are qualified.
Volunteer, or read more about what this involves.
Related categories

52 found
Order:
1 — 50 / 52
  1. added 2020-02-12
    The Self and Its Brain: An Argument for Interactionism.Daniel C. Dennett - 1979 - Journal of Philosophy 76 (2):91-97.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   39 citations  
  2. added 2019-06-06
    Concevoir l'esprit comme une force: L'hypothèse métaphysique de Karl Popper.Joël Dolbeault - 2013 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 138 (4):505-526.
    Au sujet de la relation esprit-corps, Popper rejette le physicalisme, défini par le principe de clôture causale du domaine physique, et tente de construire une hypothèse interactionniste en accord avec la science contemporaine. Plus précisément, Popper reproche aux formes les plus élaborées du physicalisme d'entrer en contradiction avec la théorie de l'évolution, ainsi qu'avec le rationalisme. À l'opposé, il considère que l'hypothèse interactionniste peut se nourrir d'une comparaison minutieuse entre l'esprit et les forces physiques. Cette comparaison tend à rapprocher Popper (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  3. added 2019-06-06
    Interactionism and Evolution: A Critique of Popper.Jeroen Van Rooijen - 1987 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 38:87.
  4. added 2019-04-12
    Między Światami. Karl Popper o Problemie Psychofizycznym.Tożsamość Podmiotu - 2014 - Przeglad Filozoficzny - Nowa Seria 92.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  5. added 2017-06-30
    Clock System or Cloud System?: Applying Popper's Metaphor to the Study of Human Consciousness.Hillary S. Webb - 2012 - Paranthropology 3 (4).
    The question of what human consciousness “is,” how it “works,” and what it “does” is currently being approached by myriad fields of study, each with their own particular goals and research techniques. But despite the undeniably complex nature of this enigmatic phenomenon, the prevailing scientific and institutional paradigm seems to imply that only quantitative, experimentally focused approaches are a worthy means of illuminating “truth” about human consciousness. -/- In this paper, I begin by borrowing Popper’s metaphor of “clock systems” versus (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  6. added 2017-06-30
    Popper and the Mind-Body Problem.Roland Puccetti - 1985 - In Gregory Currie & Alan Musgrave (eds.), Popper and the Human Sciences. Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 45--55.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  7. added 2017-06-30
    Reply to Popper's Attack on Epiphenomenalism.Gerhard D. Wassermann - 1979 - Mind 88 (October):572-75.
  8. added 2017-06-30
    Natural Selection and the Emergence of Mind.Karl Popper - 1978 - Dialectica 32 (3‐4):339-55.
  9. added 2017-06-29
    Popper Et le Problème du Corps Et de L’'Me.Thomas Chabin - 2007 - Philosophia Scientae 11:159-193.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  10. added 2017-06-29
    Objective Knowledge Out of Ignorance: Popper on Body, Mind, and the Third World.Herbert Keuth - 1974 - Theory and Decision 5 (4):391-412.
  11. added 2017-01-29
    How to Keep Fit, Lects., by W. Mca. Eccles [and Others].William Mcadam How & Eccles - 1914
  12. added 2017-01-21
    Interactionism and Evolution: A Critique of Popper.Jeroen Rooijevann - 1987 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 38 (1):87-92.
  13. added 2017-01-20
    Review Symposium : Sir Karl Popper and Sir John Eccles. The Self and its Brain. New York: Springer Verlag, 1977. Pp. XVI + 597. $17.90. Unpacking Some Dualities Inherent in a Mind/Brain Dualism Karl H.Pribram Psychology, Stanford University. [REVIEW]Karl H. Pribram, Donald O. Hebb & Frank Jackson - 1980 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 10 (3):295-308.
  14. added 2017-01-18
    A Review of Eccles' Arguments for Dualist-Interactionism. [REVIEW]Sven Rosenkranz - 1994 - In Ulla Wessels & Georg Meggle (eds.), Analyomen 1. Hawthorne: De Gruyter. pp. 689-694.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  15. added 2017-01-18
    A Note on the Body-Mind Problem.Karl R. Popper - 1954 - Analysis 15 (June):131-35.
  16. added 2016-05-26
    Brightman and Popper on the Emergence of the Person: Implications for the Abortion Issue.Joe Barnhart - 2006 - The Pluralist 1 (2):57 - 67.
  17. added 2016-05-26
    Taking Popper Seriously.Michael Bradie - 1996 - Biology and Philosophy 11 (2):259-270.
  18. added 2016-03-01
    Knowledge and the Body-Mind Problem & the Myth of the Framework by Karl Popper.Michael Ben-Chaim - 1998 - Philosophia 26 (3-4):529-544.
  19. added 2016-03-01
    Review: Karl Popper. The Myth of the Framework. Knowledge and the Body-Mind Problem. [REVIEW]A. Bird - 1996 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 47 (1):149-151.
  20. added 2015-12-22
    John Carew Eccles, un neurocientífico en busca del alma: Una aproximación bibliográfica.Alberto Gutiérrez Martínez - 2005 - Ciudad de Dios: Revista Agustiniana 218 (1):145-158.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  21. added 2015-12-22
    Causal Emergentism.Olga Markič - 2004 - Acta Analytica 19 (33):65-81.
    In this paper I describe basic features of traditional (British) emergentism and Popper’s emergentist theory of consciousness and compare them to the contemporary versions of emergentism present in connectionist approach in cognitive sciences. I argue that despite their similarities, the traditional form, as well as Popper’s theory belong to strong causal emergentism and yield radically different ontological consequences compared to the weaker, contemporary version present in cognitive science. Strong causal emergentism denies the causal closure of the physical domain and introduces (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  22. added 2015-12-22
    Consciousness-Poppers Contribution.Roger James - 1995 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 2 (2):188-190.
    Popper, who was 92 when he died on 17 September 1994, was widely acclaimed as the greatest philosopher of science and by many as the greatest philosopher of any kind of the twentieth century. His most outstanding achievement was probably his solving of the age-old problem of induction . He showed that there is no such thing. Induction does not exist. Hume in his Treatise of Human Nature, 1739, had succeeeded in proving that experience and reason have no necessary connection (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  23. added 2015-12-22
    Interactionism Revived?Frank Jackson - 1980 - Philosophy of Social Science 10 (September):316-23.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  24. added 2015-12-22
    Karl R. Popper and John C. Eccles's "The Self and its Brain". [REVIEW]Ruth Macklin - 1979 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 40 (2):290.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  25. added 2015-12-22
    POPPER, K. R. And ECCLES, J. C.: "The Self and its Brain". [REVIEW]C. Mortensen - 1978 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 56:264.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  26. added 2015-12-22
    A Note on Popper's Argument for Dualism.Wilfrid S. Sellars - 1954 - Analysis 15 (October):23-24.
  27. added 2015-12-22
    Language and the Body-Mind Problem.Karl R. Popper - 1953 - Proceedings of the XIth International Congress of Philosophy 7:101-107.
  28. added 2015-12-20
    Knowledge and the Body-Mind Problem: In Defence of Interaction.Karl R. Popper (ed.) - 1994 - Routledge.
    One of the most influential thinkers of the 20th century, Sir Karl Popper here examines the problems connected with human freedom, creativity, rationality and the relationship between human beings and their actions. In this illuminating series of papers, Popper suggests a theory of mind-body interaction that relates to evolutionary emergence, human language and what he calls "the three worlds." Rene; Descartes first posited the existence of two worlds--the world of physical bodies and the world of mental states. Popper argues for (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   18 citations  
  29. added 2015-12-20
    Popper, Karl and Eccles, John-the Question of the Body-Mind Relationship Between Philosophy and Science.A. Vigliani - 1983 - Filosofia 34 (2):87-144.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  30. added 2015-12-20
    Mind-Brain Interaction: Mentalism Yes, Dualism No.Roger W. Sperry - 1980 - Neuroscience 5 (2):195-206.
  31. added 2015-12-20
    POPPER, KARL R. And JOHN C. ECCLES "The Self and Its Brain: An Argument for Interactionism". [REVIEW]Godfrey Vesey - 1979 - Philosophy 54:249.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  32. added 2015-12-20
    "The Self and Its Brain: An Argument for Interactionism," by Karl R. Popper and John C. Eccles.George J. Stack - 1979 - Modern Schoolman 56 (3):269-276.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  33. added 2015-12-20
    The Self and Its Brain: An Argument for Interactionism By Karl R. Popper and John C. Eccles Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1977, Xvi + 597 Pp., 66 Figs., £9.40. [REVIEW]Godfrey Vesey - 1979 - Philosophy 54 (208):249-.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  34. added 2015-12-20
    The Self and Its Brain: An Argument for Interactionism.Karl R. Popper & John C. Eccles - 1977 - Springer.
    Physical and chemical processes may act upon the mind; and when we are writing a difficult letter, our mind acts upon our body and, through a chain of physical...
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   492 citations  
  35. added 2015-12-20
    Language and the Body-Mind Problem: A Restatement of Interactionism.Karl R. Popper - 1953 - Proceedings of the XI International Congress of Philosophy 7:101-107.
    It is not a paper on linguistic analysis (the analysis of word-usages). For I completely reject the claim of certain language analysts that the source of philosophical difficulties is to be found in the misuse of language. No doubt some people talk nonsense, but I claim (a) that there does not exist a logical or language-analytical method of detecting philosophical nonsense (which, by the way, does not stop short of the ranks of logicians, language analysts and semanticists); (b) that the (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  36. added 2015-12-19
    Mind as a Force Field: Comments on a New Interactionistic Hypothesis.B. I. B. Lindahl & P. Århem - 1994 - Journal of Theoretical Biology 171:111-22.
    The survival and development of consciousness in biological evolution call for an explanation. An interactionistic mind-brain theory seems to have the greatest explanatory value in this context. An interpretation of an interactionistic hypothesis, recently proposed by Karl Popper, is discussed both theoretically and based on recent experimental data. In the interpretation, the distinction between the conscious mind and the brain is seen as a division into what is subjective and what is objective, and not as an ontological distinction between something (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  37. added 2015-12-19
    Epiphenomenalism and Machines: A Discussion of Van Rooijen's Critique of Popper.Davor Pećnjak - 1989 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 40 (3):404-408.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (11 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  38. added 2015-12-19
    Popper and the Evolution of Consciousness.K. Jones - 1986 - Philosophical Studies 31:176-182.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  39. added 2015-12-19
    ECCLES, JOHN C. The Human Psyche. [REVIEW]J. M. Hinton - 1982 - Philosophy 57:137.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  40. added 2015-12-19
    The Human Psyche By John C. Eccles Springer International, 1980, Xv+278 Pp., US £26.00. [REVIEW]J. M. Hinton - 1982 - Philosophy 57 (219):137-.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  41. added 2015-12-19
    John C. Eccles.Can Materialism Be - 1976 - In G. Gordon, Grover Maxwell & I. Savodnik (eds.), Consciousness and the Brain: A Scientific and Philosophical Inquiry. Plenum.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  42. added 2015-12-19
    Déterminisme Et Liberté. Nouvelle Position d'Un Ancien Problème: Le Modèle de Popper.Jean Ladrière - 1967 - Revue Philosophique De Louvain 65 (88):467-496.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  43. added 2015-08-04
    Wittgenstein and Physicalism.Joseph Agassi - 1991 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 41:67-97.
    In the light of a sketch of the history of modem Anti-Metaphysics up from Francis Bacon Wittgenstein's position - the refusal of the possibility of metaphysical assertions - is compared with the views of Mach, of Camap and Neurath and of Popper. Analysing the notions of 'nonsense', 'meaninglessness' and 'Scheinproblem', their interrelations and connections to physicalism three variants of Anti-Metaphysics are distinguished: the Enlightenment view, the positivistMachian view and the linguistic Wittgensteinian view. The present day actuality of these views is (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  44. added 2015-07-21
    Sir John Eccles in Memoriam a Tireless Warrior for Dualism.Helena Eccles & H. J. Biersack - 2000
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  45. added 2015-07-21
    Eccles-Iastical Dualism: Review of Evolution of the Brain: Creation of the Self by John Eccles. [REVIEW]Selmer Bringsjord & Joseph Daraio - 1999 - PSYCHE: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Research On Consciousness 5.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  46. added 2015-07-21
    Review of John C. Eccles's How the Self Controls Its Brain. [REVIEW]Manuel Bremer - 1998 - Sorites 9:56-59.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  47. added 2015-07-21
    Popper's Critique of Panpsychism and Process Proto-Mentalism.Andrew G. Bjelland - 1982 - Modern Schoolman 59 (May):233-43.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  48. added 2015-07-19
    Reflections on the Interactionist Dualism of Karl Popper.R. Corvi - 1997 - Rivista di Filosofia Neo-Scolastica 89 (2-3):338-354.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  49. added 2015-07-19
    Popper and Eccles' Psychophysical Interaction Theses Examined.Rodney J. Douglas & Bernard P. Keaney - 1985 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 23 (1):129-153.
    Popper and Eccles present two different notions of Interactionism. Popper's arguments arise out of the traditional philosophical debate, whereas Eccles' arguments arise out of a mixture of neurophysiology and personal belief. Popper's three-world ontology is the philosophical foundation of both their positions. However, it is precisely against the background of the three Worlds that the considerable differences between their positions are apparent. Despite these defects, Interactionism is a productive notion since it does not place the Self beyond experimental investigation. Indeed, (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  50. added 2015-07-19
    Consciousness and Complexity: Evolutionary Perspectives on the Mind-Body Problem.William P. Bechtel & Robert C. Richardson - 1983 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 61 (4):378-95.
    (1983). Consciousness and complexity: Evolutionary perspectives on the mind-body problem. Australasian Journal of Philosophy: Vol. 61, No. 4, pp. 378-395.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
1 — 50 / 52