This category needs an editor. We encourage you to help if you are qualified.
Volunteer, or read more about what this involves.
Related categories

8 found
  1. added 2019-12-20
    Jaspers and Popper: Two Flawed But Illuminating Philosophers for Contemporary Pluralistic Psychiatry.Neil MacFarlane - 2007 - Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 14 (1):71-73.
  2. added 2017-06-30
    Karl R. Popper y la descalificación científica del psicoanálisis.Teresa Sánchez Sánchez - 1998 - Cuadernos Salmantinos de Filosofía 25:303-317.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
    Export citation  
  3. added 2017-06-29
    Psychoanalyzing Historicists?: The Enigmatic Popper. [REVIEW]Setargew Kenaw - 2010 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 41 (2):315 - 332.
    The paper shows how Karl Popper's critique of 'historicism' is permeated by psychoanalytic discourse regardless of his critique that psychoanalysis is one of the exemplars of pseudoscience. Early on, when he was formulating his philosophy of science, Popper had an apparently stringent criterion, viz. falsifiablity, and painstaking analysis. The central argument of this paper is that despite his representation of psychoanalysis as the principal illustration of the category he dubs as 'pseudoscience', Popper's analysis has been infused with psychoanalysis when it (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
    Export citation  
  4. added 2017-06-29
    Psychoanalysis Interpretation and Science.Jim Hopkins - 1992 - In J. Hopkins & A. Savile (eds.), Psychoanalysis Mind and Art. Blackwell.
    Our commonsense understanding of meaning and motive is realized via the semantic encoding of causal role. Appreciating this together with other features of semantic theories enables us to see that methodological critiques of psychoanalysis, such as those by Popper and Grunbaum, systematically fail to take account of empirical data, and if taken seriously would render commonsense understanding of mind and language void. This is particularly problematic if we consider much of what we regard ourselves as knowing is registered in language, (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
    Export citation  
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  5. added 2015-12-19
    Escape From Evidence?: Popper, Social Science, and Psychoanalytic Social Theory.Neil McLaughlin - 2007 - Dialogue 46 (4):761-780.
  6. added 2015-07-21
    Las Críticas de Popper Al Psicoanálisis.Fernanda Clavel de Kruyff - 2004 - Signos Filosóficos 6 (11s):85-99.
    This article compares Popper´s notion that psychoanalysis is pseudoscientific with the position that psychoanalysis, in its several branches, is a valuable and rational discipline, regardless of its scientific status. It is supported that the frame concept criteria by Popper between what is scien..
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
    Export citation  
  7. added 2015-07-21
    Is Freudian Psychoanalytic Theory Pseudo-Scientific by Karl Popper's Criterion of Demarcation?Adolf Grünbaum - 1979 - American Philosophical Quarterly 16 (2):131 - 141.
  8. added 2015-07-21
    Is Psychoanalysis a Pseudo-Science? Karl Popper Versus Sigmund Freud.Adolf Grünbaum - 1977 - Zeitschrift für Philosophische Forschung 31 (3):333 - 353.