This category needs an editor. We encourage you to help if you are qualified.
Volunteer, or read more about what this involves.
Related categories

9 found
Order:
  1. Popper's Communitarianism.Jeff Kochan - 2009 - In Zuzana Parusniková & Robert S. Cohen (eds.), Rethinking Popper (Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science 272). Springer. pp. 287--303.
    In this chapter, I argue that Karl Popper was a communitarian philosopher. This will surprise some readers. Liberals often tout Popper as one of their champions. Indeed, there is no doubt that Popper shared much in common with liberals. However, I will argue that Popper rejected a central, though perhaps not essential, pillar of liberal theory, namely, individualism. This claim may seem to contradict Popper's professed methodological individualism. Yet I argue that Popper was a methodological individualist in name only. In (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  2. Challenging Cultural Relativism From a Critical-Rationalist Ethical Perspective.Harald Stelzer - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 10:401-407.
    This paper is based on the assumption that critical rationalism represents a middle position between absolutist and relativistic positions because it rejects all attempts of ultimate justification as well as basic relativistic claims. Even though the critical-rationalist problem-solving-approach based on the method of trial and error leads to an acknowledgment of the plurality of theories and moral standards, it must not be confused with relativism. The relativistic claims of the incommensurability of cultures and the equality of all views of the (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  3. Knowledge and the Body-Mind Problem & the Myth of the Framework by Karl Popper.Michael Ben-Chaim - 1998 - Philosophia 26 (3-4):529-544.
  4. Why in Planning the Myth of the Framework is Anything but That.Andreas Faludi - 1998 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 28 (3):381-399.
    The Myth of the Framework, Popper attacks the doctrine that truth is relative to one's intellectual background. The same collection refers to his "situational analysis." This article explores the implications of both for spatial planning. Spatial planners have to justify proposals. The article first summarizes earlier work on planning methodology evolving around the rationality principle and the implications for it of Popper's work for how to do this. It then discusses the notion of the definition of the decision situation, which (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  5. The Myth of the Framework: In Defence of Science and Rationality Karl R. Popper, Edited by M. A. Notturno London and New York: Routledge, Xiii + 229 Pp. £27.50.Knowledge and the Body-Mind Problem: In Defence of Interaction Karl R. Popper, Edited by M. A. Notturno London and New York: Routledge, Ix + 158 Pp. £25. [REVIEW]John Watkins - 1996 - Philosophy 71 (276):315-.
  6. The Myth of the Framework: In Defense of Science and Rationality.Karl R. Popper - 1994 - In Mark Amadeus Notturno (ed.), The Myth of the Framework: In Defence of Science and Rationality. London: Routledge. pp. 33-64.
  7. Refined Falsificationism Meets the Challenge From the Relativist Philosophy of Science. [REVIEW]Gerard Radnitzky - 1991 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 42 (2):273-284.
    In our century, the philosophy of science has been overshadowed by two towering figures: Popper and Wittgenstein, both Viennese emigrants, who have become subjects to the Queen (cf., e.g., Radnitzky [1987a] Entre Wittgenstein et Popper ... ). The discussion has been structured by two great controversies: from the 30s Popper versus logical positivism (or falsificationism versus verificationism/probabilism), and from the 60s 'the new philosophy of science' versus Critical Rationalism. (Exemplary contributions to thes two controversies can be found, e.g., in the (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  8. Popper, Tarski and Relativism.Richard C. Jennings - 1983 - Analysis 43 (3):118 - 123.
  9. Waarheidsliefde En Relativisme.Arnold Burms & Herman de Dijn - 1979 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 41 (4):590 - 614.
    One can assign three different aims to the desire for knowledge : utility, pleasure, truth-for-truth's-sake. Whereas the first two aims have a concretely determinable content and therefore look evident, the third one has been looked upon as strange and problematic : it is not immediately clear what kind of value is defended in this case. Popper is one of the recent defenders of the traditional ideal of truth-for-truth's-sake. He wants to defend the ideal against three positions : a primitive taboo-ridden (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark