This category needs an editor. We encourage you to help if you are qualified.
Volunteer, or read more about what this involves.
Related categories

6 found
  1. added 2017-06-29
    Why in Planning the Myth of the Framework is Anything but That.Andreas Faludi - 1998 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 28 (3):381-399.
    The Myth of the Framework, Popper attacks the doctrine that truth is relative to one's intellectual background. The same collection refers to his "situational analysis." This article explores the implications of both for spatial planning. Spatial planners have to justify proposals. The article first summarizes earlier work on planning methodology evolving around the rationality principle and the implications for it of Popper's work for how to do this. It then discusses the notion of the definition of the decision situation, which (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (7 more)  
    Export citation  
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  2. added 2016-12-19
    Waarheidsliefde En Relativisme.Arnold Burms & Herman de Dijn - 1979 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 41 (4):590 - 614.
    One can assign three different aims to the desire for knowledge : utility, pleasure, truth-for-truth's-sake. Whereas the first two aims have a concretely determinable content and therefore look evident, the third one has been looked upon as strange and problematic : it is not immediately clear what kind of value is defended in this case. Popper is one of the recent defenders of the traditional ideal of truth-for-truth's-sake. He wants to defend the ideal against three positions : a primitive taboo-ridden (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
    Export citation  
  3. added 2016-03-01
    Knowledge and the Body-Mind Problem & the Myth of the Framework by Karl Popper.Michael Ben-Chaim - 1998 - Philosophia 26 (3-4):529-544.
  4. added 2015-12-20
    Challenging Cultural Relativism From a Critical-Rationalist Ethical Perspective.Harald Stelzer - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 10:401-407.
    This paper is based on the assumption that critical rationalism represents a middle position between absolutist and relativistic positions because it rejects all attempts of ultimate justification as well as basic relativistic claims. Even though the critical-rationalist problem-solving-approach based on the method of trial and error leads to an acknowledgment of the plurality of theories and moral standards, it must not be confused with relativism. The relativistic claims of the incommensurability of cultures and the equality of all views of the (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
    Export citation  
  5. added 2015-12-20
    Refined Falsificationism Meets the Challenge From the Relativist Philosophy of Science. [REVIEW]Gerard Radnitzky - 1991 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 42 (2):273-284.
  6. added 2015-12-19
    Popper, Tarski and Relativism.Richard C. Jennings - 1983 - Analysis 43 (3):118 - 123.