Related categories
Subcategories:

141 found
Order:
1 — 50 / 141
Material to categorize
  1. Rationality: The Critical View.Joseph Agassi & I. C. Jarvie (eds.) - 1987 - Kluwer Academic Publishers.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  2. Desgabets: Rationalist or Cartesian Empiricist?Sean Allen-Hermanson - 2008 - In Jon Miller (ed.), Topics in Early Modern Philosophy of Mind (Springer).
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3. Oblicza Racjonalności.Zbigniew Ambrożewicz (ed.) - 2000 - Uniwersytet Opolski.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4. Why I Am a Rationalist, Books Which Influenced Me.Rationalist Press Association - 1942 - Watts & Co.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5. La Racionalidad y El Sentido Moral: Un Estudio Sobre Fundamentación de la Moral.Luz Marina Barreto - 2011 - Fondo Editorial de Humanidades y Educación, Universidad Central de Venezuela.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6. The Retreat to Commitment.William Warren Bartley - 1964 - Open Court Pub. Co..
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   89 citations  
  7. Intuition and Modal Error.George Bealer - 2008 - In Quentin Smith (ed.), Epistemology: New Essays. Oxford University Press.
    Modal intuitions are not only the primary source of modal knowledge but also the primary source of modal error. An explanation of how modal error arises — and, in particular, how erroneous modal intuitions arise — is an essential part of a comprehensive theory of knowledge and evidence. This chapter begins with a summary of certain preliminaries: the phenomenology of intuitions, their fallibility, the nature of concept-understanding and its relationship to the reliability of intuitions, and so forth. It then identifies (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8. Bonjour's Arguments Against Skepticism About the A Priori.James Beebe - 2008 - Philosophical Studies 137 (2):243 - 267.
    I reconstruct and critique two arguments Laurence BonJour has recently offered against skepticism about the a priori. While the arguments may provide anti-skeptical, internalist foundationalists with reason to accept the a priori, I show that neither argument provides sufficient reason for believing the more general conclusion that there is no rational alternative to accepting the a priori.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9. A Priori Skepticism.James R. Beebe - 2011 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 83 (3):583-602.
    In this article I investigate a neglected form of radical skepticism that questions whether any of our logical, mathematical and other seemingly self-evident beliefs count as knowledge. ‘A priori skepticism,’ as I will call it, challenges our ability to know any of the following sorts of propositions: (1.1) The sum of two and three is five. (1.2) Whatever is square is rectangular. (1.3) Whatever is red is colored. (1.4) No surface can be uniformly red and uniformly blue at the same (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10. BonJour's Abductivist Reply to Skepticism.James R. Beebe - 2007 - Philosophia 35 (2):181-196.
    The abductivist reply to skepticism is the view that commonsense explanations of the patterns and regularities that appear in our sensory experiences should be rationally preferred to skeptical explanations of those same patterns and regularities on the basis of explanatory considerations. In this article I critically examine Laurence BonJour’s rationalist version of the abductivist position. After explaining why BonJour’s account is more defensible than other versions of the view, I argue that the notion of probability he relies upon is deeply (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  11. A-Priorism and Empiricism.John J. Birch - 1924 - The Monist 34 (1):131-149.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12. Das Problem der Intuition im Rationalismus und Empirismus.Johan Fredrik Bjelke - 1972 - Zeitschrift für Philosophische Forschung 26 (4):546 - 562.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13. Contemporary Science and Rationalism.Robert Blanché - 1968 - Edinburgh, Oliver & Boyd.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14. Four Theses Concerning a Priori Justification.Laurence BonJour - 2000 - The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 5:13-20.
    In my book In Defense of Pure Reason, I offer an extended defense of the idea of a priori justification and, more specifically, of a rationalist conception of such justification: one according to which rational insight or intuition provides genuine justification for claims that need not be merely definitional or tautological in character. In the relatively brief space available to me on the present occasion, I want to present and defend, necessarily in rather broad strokes, four of the most central (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15. Reason in Philosophy: Animating Ideas.Robert Brandom - 2009 - Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
    This is a paradigmatic work of contemporary philosophy.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   28 citations  
  16. Individuals and Worlds: Essays in Anthropological Rationalism.D. P. Chattopadhyaya - 1976 - Oxford University Press.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17. Rationalism.John Cottingham - 1984 - Paladin.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  18. Tr̥tīẏa Naẏana.Sudhānśu Śekhara Dhaḍā - 2005 - Prāptisthāna, Oḍiśā Hetubādī Samāja.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19. The Limits of Aesthetic Empiricism.Fabian Dorsch - 2014 - In Gregory Currie, Matthew Kieran, Aaron Meskin & Jon Robson (eds.), Aesthetics and the Sciences of Mind. Oxford University Press. pp. 75-100.
    In this chapter, I argue against empiricist positions which claim that empirical evidence can be sufficient to defeasibly justify aesthetic judgements, or judgements about the adequacy of aesthetic judgements, or sceptical judgements about someone's capacity to form adequate aesthetic judgements. First, empirical evidence provides neither inferential, nor non-inferential justification for aesthetic opinions. Second, while empirical evidence may tell us how we do respond aesthetically to artworks, it cannot tell us how we should respond to them. And, third, empirical insights into (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  20. Back to the Rough Ground: Practical Judgment and the Lure of Technique.Joseph Dunne - 1993 - University of Notre Dame Press.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   43 citations  
  21. Rationalism V. Constructionism a Skeptical View.James D. Fearon & Alexander Wendt - 2002
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22. Review: Troubles with Peacocke's Rationalism. A Critical Study of "The Realm of Reason". [REVIEW]Miguel Ángel Fernández - 2006 - Critica 38 (112):81 - 103.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23. The Realm of Reason. [REVIEW]Julian Fink - 2005 - Logical Analysis and History of Philosophy 8.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24. Experimental Philosophy, Rationalism, and Naturalism: Rethinking Philosophical Method.Eugen Fischer & John Collins (eds.) - 2015 - Routledge.
    Experimental philosophy is one of the most exciting and controversial philosophical movements today. This book explores how it is reshaping thought about philosophical method. Experimental philosophy imports experimental methods and findings from psychology into philosophy. These fresh resources can be used to develop and defend both armchair methods and naturalist approaches, on an empirical basis. This outstanding collection brings together leading proponents of this new meta-philosophical naturalism, from within and beyond experimental philosophy. They explore how the empirical study of philosophically (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  25. Hume and Reason.Marco Antonio Frangiotti - 2010 - Principia: An International Journal of Epistemology 4 (2):277-304.
    In this article I challenge the current view that Hume is a naturalist as well as a sceptic. I hold he is a peculiar kind of rationalist. I argue that his position is best viewed as a philosophical approach designed to accommodate the tendencies of human nature. This task is carried out by means of a second-order reflection, which turns out to be based upon reason of a non-demonstrative kind. It is brought into clear focus when the mind discovers a (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26. Aristotle's Rationalism.Michael Frede - 1996 - In Michael Frede & Gisela Striker (eds.), Rationality in Greek Thought. Oxford University Press. pp. 157--173.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27. Rationality to-Day =.Hans-Georg Gadamer & Théodore F. Geraets (eds.) - 1979 - University of Ottawa Press.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  28. Rationalität Und Emotionalität.Heinrich Ganthaler, Otto Neumaier & Gerhard Zecha (eds.) - 2009 - Lit.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29. Naturalism and Rationality.Garver Newton & H. Hare Peter (eds.) - 1986 - Prometheus Books.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30. Spinning Threads: On Peacocke's Moderate Rationalism.Maximilian De Gaynesford - 2006 - Philosophical Books 47 (2):111-119.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31. Review: Comments on Plantinga's Two-Volume Work on Warrant. [REVIEW]Carl Ginet - 1995 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 55 (2):403 - 408.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  32. Les Deux Rationalismes: Blaise Et René.André Girard - 2011 - Psr.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33. Pōṣṭuceyani Uttarālu: Ādhyātmika Vāda--Bhautika Vāda Samanvyamu. Gōpīcand - 2006 - [For Copies], Ashok Book Centre.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34. Between Scepticism and Rationalism.Shefali Gupta - 1974 - Scientific Book Agency.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35. Pragmatic Liberalism and the Critique of Modernity.Gary Gutting - 2012 - Cambridge University Press.
    In this book Gary Gutting offers a powerful account of the nature of human reason in modern times. The fundamental question addressed by the book is what authority human reason can still claim once it is acknowledged that our fundamental metaphysical and religious pictures of the world no longer command allegiance. If ethics and science remain sources of authority what is the basis of that authority? Gutting develops answers to these questions through critical analysis of the work of three dominant (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  36. Contingency and Judgement in Oakeshott's Political Thought.Bruce Haddock - 2005 - European Journal of Political Theory 4 (1):7-21.
    The article focuses on Oakeshott’s attempt to maintain a categorial distinction between political philosophy and normative prescription. It accepts the thrust of Oakeshott’s argument against rationalism in politics, but contends that the residual normative dimension in Oakeshott’s thinking should not be dismissed as philosophically irrelevant. The article takes seriously the practical demands made on agents in difficult circumstances. It focuses specifically on what may be said to be going on when we ‘pursue intimations’. By concentrating on what Oakeshott actually does (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  37. Reasons Without Rationalism.Matthew Hanser - 2008 - Review of Metaphysics 61 (4):862-863.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38. Rationality and Feminist Philosophy.Deborah K. Heikes - 2010 - Continuum.
    Exploring the history of the concept of 'rationality', Deborah K. Hakes argues that feminism should seek to develop a virtue theory of rationality.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39. Two Kinds of a Priori Infallibility.Glen Hoffmann - 2011 - Synthese 181 (2):241-253.
    On rationalist infallibilism, a wide range of both (i) analytic and (ii) synthetic a priori propositions can be infallibly justified (or absolutely warranted), i.e., justified to a degree that entails their truth and precludes their falsity. Though rationalist infallibilism is indisputably running its course, adherence to at least one of the two species of infallible a priori justification refuses to disappear from mainstream epistemology. Among others, Putnam (1978) still professes the a priori infallibility of some category (i) propositions, while Burge (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  40. The Light of Reason: Rationalist Philosophers of the 17th Century.Martin Hollis - 1973 - London: Fontana.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41. Understanding Rationalism.Charlie Huenemann - 2008 - Routledge.
    The three great historical philosophers most often associated with rationalism - Descartes, Spinoza and Leibniz - opened up ingenious and breathtaking vistas upon the world. Yet their works are so difficult that readers often find themselves stymied. "Understanding Rationalism" offers a guide for anyone approaching these thinkers for the first time.With clear explanations, elegant examples and insightful summaries, "Understanding Rationalism" unlocks their intricate metaphysical systems, which are by turns surprising, compelling and sometimes bizarre. It also lays out their controversial stances (...)
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42. The Rules of Thought.Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa & Benjamin W. Jarvis - 2013 - Oxford University Press.
    Ichikawa and Jarvis offer a new rationalist theory of mental content and defend a traditional epistemology of philosophy. They argue that philosophical inquiry is continuous with non-philosophical inquiry, and can be genuinely a priori, and that intuitions do not play an important role in mental content or the a priori.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   11 citations  
  43. Li Xing Zhu Yi de Zhe Xue.Shuren Jin - 2006 - Fu Ren da Xue Chu Ban She.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44. Constructing the World. [REVIEW]Silvia Jonas - 2014 - Philosophical Quarterly 64 (257):651-655.
  45. Response to Nichols and Katz.Richard Joyce - manuscript
    To reject a false theory on the basis of an unsound argument is, in my opinion, as much an intellectual sin as to embrace a false theory. Thus, although I am no fan of any particular form of moral rationalism—and, indeed, on occasion have gone out of my way to criticize it—when rationalism is assailed for faulty reasons I find myself in the curious position of leaping to its defense (which goes to show that in philosophy it isn’t the case (...)
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46. Aproximaciones a la epistemología francesa.Pedro Karczmarczyk, Gassmann Carlos, Acosta Jazmín Anahí, Rivera Silvia, Cuervo Sola Manuel, Torrano Andrea & Abeijón Matías - 2013 - In Karczmarczyk Pedro (ed.), Estudios de Epistemología. Instituto de epistemología, Universidad Nacional de Tucumán. pp. 1-164.
    Aproximaciones a la escuela francesa de epistemología Los problemas que dominan a la epistemología pueden contextualizarse históricamente como una forma de racionalidad filosófica. La filosofía se ha presentado a lo largo de la historia como un discurso en el que sus diversos componentes (metafísica, ontología, gnoseología, ética, lógica, etc.) se mostraron unidos en el molde de la ?unidad del saber?. En este marco unitario alguna de las formas del saber filosófico detenta usualmente una posición dominante. El énfasis colocado en la (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47. Analytic Philosophy.John-Michael Kuczynski - 2009 - Kendall Hunt Pub. Co.
    Philosophy is the science of the science; it is the analysis of the assumptions underlying empirical inquiry. Given that these assumptions cannot possibly be examined or even identified on the basis of empirical data, it follows that philosophy is a non-empirical discipline. And given that our linguistic and cultural practices cannot possibly be examined or even identified except on the basis of empirical data, it follows that philosophical questions are not linguistic questions and do not otherwise concern our conventions or (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48. Questioning the Unquestionable: Thoughts on Religion and Rationalism.N. Kunju - 2011 - Pancham Publications.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49. Book Review of Trigg, R., "Philosophy Matters". [REVIEW]Michael Lacewing - 2002 - Think 3:107-111.
    A book review of Trigg's Philosophy Matters, covering issues of scientism, relativism and rationality.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50. The Possibility of Rationalism in Ethics.John Laird - 1929 - Philosophy 4 (13):50-.
    An ethic is rational if it can justify itself rationally—that is to say, if there is a “why” and a “wherefore” in it amenable to reflection, and underivative. An ethic, on the other hand, is irrational if reason and reflection are irrelevant to it, or if, being relevant, they are fundamentally subordinate, and are only the lackeys of a governing consideration which is either irrational or non-rational. The intention of this lecture is to explore the possibilities of rationalism in ethics, (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 141