Bookmark and Share

Sense-Datum Theories

Edited by Benj Hellie (University of Toronto, University of Toronto at Scarborough)
Related categories
Siblings:See also:
296 found
Search inside:
(import / add options)   Order:
1 — 50 / 296
  1. R. I. Aaron (1958). The Common Sense View of Sense-Perception. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 58:1-14.
  2. E. M. Adams (1958). The Nature of the Sense-Datum Theory. Mind 67 (April):216-226.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  3. V. C. Aldrich & Herbert Feigl (1935). Spatial Location and the Psycho-Physical Problem. Philosophy of Science 2 (2):256-261.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4. Virgil C. Aldrich (1979). Objective Sense-Data. Personalist 60 (January):36-42.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  5. Virgil C. Aldrich (1955). Is an After-Image a Sense-Datum? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 15 (3):369-376.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6. Virgil C. Aldrich (1934). Are There Vague Sense-Data? Mind 43 (172):477-482.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7. Leslie Allan, The Existence of Mind-Independent Physical Objects.
    The author challenges both the eliminative idealist's contention that physical objects do not exist and the phenomenalist idealist's view that statements about physical objects are translatable into statements about private mental experiences. Firstly, he details how phenomenalist translations are parasitic on the realist assumption that physical objects exist independently of experience. Secondly, the author confronts eliminative idealism head on by exposing its heuristic sterility in contrast with realism's predictive success.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8. R. E. Allinson (1978). A Non-Dualistic Reply to Moore's Refutation of Idealism. Indian Philosophical Quarterly 5 (July):661-668.
    As a counter-argument to Moore's "Refutation of Idealism," this article explains how the application of non-dualistic idealism reveals the underlying problem in both narrowly defined "esse is principi" brands of idealism and Moore's realism. The issue at hand, this article suggests, is the presupposition that experience naturally forks off into subjective consciousness and particular objects of consciousness. Rather than agree with either Moore or dualistic forms of idealism, the Vedanta-inspired view set forth in this article provides a third option to (...)
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9. William P. Alston (1957). Is a Sense-Datum Language Necessary? Philosophy of Science 24 (1):41-45.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10. D. Z. Andriopoulos (1979). Did Aristotle Assume a Sense-Data Theory? Philosophical Inquiry 1 (2):125-128.
  11. D. Z. Andriopoulos (1979). Did Aristotle Assume a Sense-Data Theory? Philosophical Inquiry 1 (2):125-128.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12. Lennart Åqvist (1960). Notes on A. J. Ayer's "The Terminology of Sense-Data". Analysis 20 (5):106 - 111.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13. David Malet Armstrong (1979). Perception, Sense-Data, and Causality. In Graham Macdonald (ed.), Perception and Identity: Essays Presented to A.~J. Ayer with His Replies. Macmillan
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  14. J. L. Austin (1964). Sense And Sensibilia; Reconstructed From The Manuscript Notes By G J Warnock. Oxford University Press.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  15. J. L. Austin (1962). Sense and Sensibilia. Oxford University Press.
    This book is the one to put into the hands of those who have been over-impressed by Austin 's critics....[Warnock's] brilliant editing puts everybody who is concerned with philosophical problems in his debt.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   192 citations  
  16. A. J. Ayer (1970). Metaphysics and Common Sense. San Francisco,Freeman, Cooper.
    On making philosophy intelligible.--What is communication?--Meaning and intentionality.--What must there be?--Metaphysics and common sense.--Philosophy and science.--Chance.--Knowledge, belief, and evidence.--Has Austin refuted the sense-datum theory?--Professor Malcolm on dreams.--An appraisal of Bertrand Russell's philosophy.--G. E. Moore on propositions and facts.--Reflections on existentialism.--Man as a subject for science.--Philosophy and politics.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   7 citations  
  17. A. J. Ayer (1967). Has Austin Refuted the Sense-Datum Theory? Synthese 17 (June):117-140.
  18. A. J. Ayer (1945). The Terminology of Sense-Data. Mind 54 (October):289-312.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19. A. J. Ayer (1940). The Foundations Of Empirical Knowledge. Macmillan.
  20. A. J. Ayer & Graham Macdonald (eds.) (1979). Perception and Identity: Essays Presented to A. J. Ayer, with His Replies. Cornell University Press.
  21. Michael Ayers (2000). Can There Be a New Empiricism? The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 7:111-127.
    ‘Empiricism’ has become for many a dirty word, and many writers have in mind the kind of neo-Humean Positivism that is the target of Wittgenstein’s Private Language Argument, Quine’s ‘Two Dogmas of Empiricism’, or Merleau-Ponty’s Phénoménologie de la perception. But examination of the Empiricist tradition before Hume uncovers views that do not involve anything like the much-abused “Myth of the Given” or twentieth-century sensedatum theory. This paper identifiesthe particular line of seventeenth-century thought that eventually gave rise to sense-datum theory, and (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  22. Ba (2004). On the Ontological Issue of Sense Data. Philosophia 33 (2):125-154.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23. H. F. Barnes (1945). The Myth of Sense-Data. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 45:89.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24. Winston H. F. Barnes (1945). The Myth of Sense-Data. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 45 (1):89-118.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  25. H. C. Becroft (1925). Professor Norman Kemp Smith's Theory of the Sensa. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 3 (3):179 – 189.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26. Gustav Bergmann (1947). Sense Data, Linguistic Conventions, and Existence. Philosophy of Science 14 (2):152-163.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27. José Luis Bermúdez (2000). Naturalized Sense Data. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 61 (2):353 - 374.
    This paper examines and defends the view that the immediate objects of visual perception, or what are often called sense data, are parts of the facing surfaces of physical objects-the naturalized sense data theory. Occasionally defended in the literature on the philosophy of perception, most famously by G. E. Moore , it has not proved popular and indeed was abandoned by Moore himself. The contemporary situation in the philosophy of perception seems ripe for a revaluation of the NSD theory. however. (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  28. Stephen H. Bickham (1975). What is at Issue in the Ayer-Austin Dispute About Sense-Data. Midwestern Journal of Philosophy 1:1-8.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29. Shokti Charan Biswas (1967). The Nature and Status of Sensa. [Allahabad]Dept. Of Philosophy, University of Allahabad.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30. Max Black (1971). Philosophical Analysis. Freeport, N.Y.,Books for Libraries Press.
    Introduction MAX BLACK Nothing of any value can be said on method except through examples; but now, at the end of our course, we may collect certain general ...
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  31. W. P. Blevin (1927). The Theory of Sensa: An Aspect of Current Realism. The Monist 37 (1):50-76.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32. John W. Blyth (1935). A Discussion of Mr. Price's Perception. Mind 44 (173):58-67.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33. Boer C. De (1931). Sceptical Notes on the Sense-Datum. Journal of Philosophy 28 (19):505 - 519.
  34. W. Russell Brain (1960). Space and Sense-Data. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 11 (November):177-191.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (10 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  35. Walter R. Brain (1959). The Nature Of Experience. London,: Oxford University Press,.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  36. Philip Bretzevonl (1974). Cornman, Sensa, and the Argument From Hallucination. Philosophical Studies 26 (December):443-445.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37. Robert Briscoe (2008). Vision, Action, and Make‐Perceive. Mind and Language 23 (4):457-497.
    In this paper, I critically assess the enactive account of visual perception recently defended by Alva Noë (2004). I argue inter alia that the enactive account falsely identifies an object’s apparent shape with its 2D perspectival shape; that it mistakenly assimilates visual shape perception and volumetric object recognition; and that it seriously misrepresents the constitutive role of bodily action in visual awareness. I argue further that noticing an object’s perspectival shape involves a hybrid experience combining both perceptual and imaginative elements (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (12 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   7 citations  
  38. Audre Jean Brokes (2000). The Argument From Illusion Reconsidered. Disputatio 9 (1):1-7.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39. Richard N. Bronaugh (1964). The Argument From the Elliptical Penny. Philosophical Quarterly 14 (April):151-157.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40. Derek H. Brown (2016). A Study in Deflated Acquaintance Knowledge: Sense-Datum Theory and Perceptual Constancy. In Sorin Costreie (ed.), Early Analytic Philosophy: New Perspectives on the Tradition. Springer 99-125.
    We perceive the objective world through a subjective perceptual veil. Various perceived properties, particularly “secondary qualities” like colours and tastes, are mind-dependent. Although mind-dependent, our knowledge of many facts about the perceptual veil is immediate and secure. These are well-known facets of sense-datum theory. My aim is to carve out a conception of sense-datum theory that does not require the immediate and secure knowledge of a wealth of facts about experienced sense-data (§1). Such a theory is of value on its (...)
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41. Derek H. Brown (2010). Locating Projectivism in Intentionalism Debates. Philosophical Studies 148 (1):69-78.
    Intentionalism debates seek to uncover the relationship between the qualitative aspects of experience—phenomenal character—and the intentionality of the mind. They have been at or near center stage in the philosophy of mind for more than two decades, and in my view need to be reexamined. There are two core distinct intentionalism debates that are rarely distinguished (Sect. 1). Additionally, the characterization of spectrum inversion as involving inverted qualities and constant intentional content is mistaken (Sect. 3). These confusions can be witnessed (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  42. Norman O. Brown (1957). Sense-Data and Material Objects. Mind 66 (April):173-194.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43. Charles A. Campbell (1947). Sense Data and Judgment in Sensory Cognition. Mind 56 (October):289-316.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44. James D. Carney (1962). Was Moore Talking Nonsense in 1918? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 22 (June):521-527.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45. Gregg Caruso (1999). A Defence of the Adverbial Theory. Philosophical Writings 10:51-65.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46. David Casacuberta & Jordi Vallverdú (2013). E-Science and the Data Deluge. Philosophical Psychology 27 (1):1-15.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47. Peter T. Cash (1979). The Argument From the Hand. Philosophical Investigations 2 (4):47-70.
    This paper is an "ordinary language" analysis of the philosophical discussion of visual perception in the context of Twentieth Century British "sense datum" theorists, primarily G.E. Moore. -/- The title of the paper is derived from A.J. Ayer's "argument from illusion", which also forms part of the context of this paper. Both Moore and Ayer believed in sense datum theory, but Moore provides an interesting illustration that is intended to clarify (and also prove) sense datum theory in his paper, "A (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48. Albert Casullo (1987). A Defense of Sense-Data. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 48 (September):45-61.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  49. Suresh Chandra (1976). Sensible Awareness of Sense-Objects. Indian Philosophical Quarterly 3 (April):355-366.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50. Roderick Chisholm (1942). Discussions: The Problem of the Speckled Hen. Mind 51 (204):368-373.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
1 — 50 / 296