Related categories

102 found
Order:
1 — 50 / 102
  1. From the "Naturalistic Fallacy" to the Ideal Observer Theory.Glen O. Allen - 1970 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 30 (4):533-549.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2. From the "Naturalistic Fallacy" to the Ideal Observer Theory.Glen-O. Allen - 1970 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 30:533-549.
    G. E. MOORE'S PROOF THAT 'GOOD' CANNOT BE DEFINED IS THE\nANALOGUE OF HUME'S PROOF THAT THE IDEA OF CAUSE HAS NO\nEMPIRICAL CORRELATE. AS A PROOF, IT CANNOT SUSTAIN ETHICAL\nINTUITIONISM, EMOTIVISM, OR THE VARIOUS MODIFICATIONS OF\nETHICAL NATURALISM WHICH HAVE BEEN MADE TO REST UPON IT.\nHOWEVER, IT DOES SUSTAIN THE THEORY THAT VALUES ARE CAUSES\nOF HUMAN RESPONSES, AND THAT, UNDER A METHODOLOGICAL\nINTERPRETATION OF OBJECTIVITY, VALUES HAVE OBJECTIVE\nCOGNITIVE STATUS AS CAUSES OF RESPONSES IN THE\nCONSCIOUSNESS OF A HYPOTHETICAL BEING, AN IDEAL OBSERVER.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3. A Note on Searle's Naturalistic Fallacy Fallacy.James C. Anderson - 1974 - Analysis 34 (4):139 - 141.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4. Did Hayek Commit the Naturalistic Fallacy?Erik Angner - manuscript
    In promoting spontaneous orders – orders that evolve in a process of cultural evolution – as “efficient,” “beneficial,” and “advantageous,” Friedrich A. Hayek (1899-1992) has often been attributed the belief that there is something desirable about them. For this reason, he has been accused of committing the naturalistic fallacy, that is, of trying to derive an “ought” from an “is.” It appears that Hayek was..
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5. St. Thomas and the Naturalistic Fallacy.Michael Augros & Christopher Oleson - 2013 - The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 13 (4):637-661.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6. Rules, Definitions, And The Naturalistic Fallacy.G. P. Baker & P. M. Hacker - 1966 - American Philosophical Quarterly 3 (October):299-305.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7. Principia Ethica.Thomas Baldwin (ed.) - 1993 - Cambridge University Press.
    Principia Ethica is recognised as the definitive starting point for twentieth-century ethical theory. Its influence was first largely confined to the Bloomsbury Group - Maynard Keynes wrote that it was 'better than Plato' - who took it up for its celebration of the values of art and love; but later it achieved the widespread recognition it still retains as a classic text of analytic ethical theory. It is particularly renowned for Moore's argument that previous ethical theories have been guilty of (...)
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8. Really Taking Darwin and the Naturalistic Fallacy Seriously: An Objection to Rottschaefer and Martinsen. [REVIEW]Jonathan Barrett - 1991 - Biology and Philosophy 6 (4):433-437.
    Out of a concern to respect the naturalistic fallacy, Ruse (1986) argues for the possibility of causal, but not justificatory, explanations of morality in terms of evolutionary processes. In a discussion of Ruse's work, Rottschaefer and Martinsen (1990) claim that he erroneously limits the explanatory scope of evolutionary concepts, because he fails to see that one can have objective moral properties without committing either of two forms of the naturalistic fallacy, if one holds that moral properties supervene on non-moral properties. (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  9. Is There a Naturalistic Fallacy?Bernard H. Baumrin - 1968 - American Philosophical Quarterly 5 (2):79 - 89.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10. Moore on Goodness and the Naturalistic Fallacy.Hasna Begum - 1979 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 57 (3):251-265.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11. Hedonic Naturalism.David Brax - manuscript
    Published (in Swedish) in the journal Filosofisk tidskrift as "Hedonistisk naturalism", 2011/3.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12. Falácia naturalista e naturalismo moral: do é ao deve mediante o quero.Adriano Naves de Brito - 2010 - Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia 51 (121):215-226.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13. The Naturalistic Fallacy and Value Terms in Ethics.William Harry Bruening - 1969 - Dissertation, University of Notre Dame
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14. O problema da falácia naturalista para o projeto de uma ética evolucionista.Karla Chediak - 2006 - Kriterion: Journal of Philosophy 47 (113):147-157.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15. Quel rapport entre science et justice? - La leçon de Léon Bourgeois.Simon-Pierre Chevarie-Cossette - 2016 - In Daoust Marc-Kevin (ed.), Capitalisme, propriété et solidarité. Les Cahiers D'Ithaque.
    Le solidarisme de Léon Bourgeois constitue une tentative convaincante de surmonter l’opposition traditionnelle entre libertés individuelles et justice sociale. Bourgeois tente de relever ce défi en faisant appel aux nouvelles découvertes scientifiques en sociologie comme en biologie. En bref, l’observation de la nature nous montrerait que les humains sont en rapport de solidarité les uns avec les autres. De ce fait, on pourrait tirer un devoir de solidarité que l’État serait à même d’imposer aux individus. Fonder une théorie politique sur (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16. Theological Ethics and The Naturalistic Fallacy.John P. Crossley - 1978 - Journal of Religious Ethics 6 (1):121-134.
    Theological ethics is vulnerable to the charge made by some philosophical ethicists that it frequently commits the "naturalistic fallacy," i.e., that it fallaciously derives duties and obligations from purely descriptive theological premises. Some theological ethicists, acceding to the charge, have contented themselves with an examination of how theological ethics might "influence" or "enrich" ethical propositions based on non-theological foundations. This essay analyzes the current scene in theological ethics and argues that the "naturalistic fallacy" is not the real danger. The real (...)
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17. Who's Afraid of the Naturalistic Fallacy?Oliver Curry - unknown
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  18. The Naturalistic Fallacy Is Modern.Lorraine Daston - 2014 - Isis: A Journal of the History of Science 105 (3):579-587.
    The naturalistic fallacy appears to be ubiquitous and irresistible. The avant-garde and the rearguard, the devout and the secular, the learned elite and the lay public all seem to want to enlist nature on their side, everywhere and always. Yet a closer look at the history of the term “naturalistic fallacy” and its associated arguments suggests that this way of understanding appeals to nature’s authority in human affairs is of relatively modern origin. To apply this category cross-historically masks considerable variability (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19. Naturalism in Question.Mario De Caro & David Macarthur (eds.) - 2004 - Harvard University Press.
    This volume presents a group of leading thinkers who criticize scientific naturalism not in the name of some form of supernaturalism, but in order to defend a ...
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   9 citations  
  20. Can Kitcher Avoid the Naturalistic Fallacy?Sinion Derpmann, Dominik Düber, Tim Rojek & Konstantin Schnieder - 2013 - In Marie Kaiser & Ansgar Seide (eds.), Philip Kitcher. Pragmatic Naturalism. Ontos. pp. 61.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21. The Is/Ought Gap, the Fact/Value Distinction and the Naturalistic Fallacy.Julian Dodd & Suzanne Stern-Gillet - 1995 - Dialogue 34 (04):727-.
  22. The Naturalness of the Naturalistic Fallacy and the Ethics of Nanotechnology.Mauro Dorato - 2015 - In The Role of Technology in Science: Philosophical Perspectives. Springer Verlag.
    In the first part of this paper, I try to clear the ground from frequent misconceptions about the relationship between fact and value by examining some uses of the adjective “natural” in ethical controversies. Such uses bear evidence to our “natural” tendency to regard nature (considered in a descriptive sense, as the complex of physical and biological regularities) as the source of ethical norms. I then try to account for the origin of this tendency by offering three related explanations, the (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23. Has Anyone Committed the Naturalistic Fallacy?EImer H. Duncan - 1970 - Southwestern Journal of Philosophy 1 (1):40-46.
  24. Has Anyone Committed the Naturalistic Fallacy?Elmer H. Duncan - 1970 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 8 (1):49-55.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25. Ecocentrism and Appeals to Nature's Goodness: Must They Be Fallacious?Antoine C. Dussault - manuscript
  26. L’écocentrisme et ses appels normatifs à la nature : sont-ils nécessairement fallacieux ?Antoine C. Dussault - 2013 - In É Litalien (ed.), Peut-on tirer une éthique de l'étude de la nature ? Les Cahiers d'Ithaque. pp. 43-76.
  27. Le rôle de la science dans l'écocentrisme humien de Callicott.Antoine C. Dussault - 2010 - Revue Phares 10:103-123.
  28. Ethics and Nature.Jay Elliott - 2006 - Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 3 (3):321-334.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29. Biomedical Ethics, Public-Health Risk Assessment, and the Naturalistic Fallacy.Kevin Elliott - 2002 - Public Affairs Quarterly 16 (4):351-376.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30. Fallacia Deontica. From "Ought" to "Is".Federico L. G. Faroldi - 2012 - Rivista Internazionale di Filosofia Del Diritto 89 (3):413–418.
  31. Moore, Spencer, and the Naturalistic Fallacy.James Fieser - 1993 - History of Philosophy Quarterly 10 (3):271 - 276.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32. The Naturalistic Fallacy.W. K. Frankena - 1939 - Mind 48 (192):464-477.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   16 citations  
  33. Macintyre on Defining Morality.William K. Frankena - 1958 - Philosophy 33 (125):158 - 162.
    IN “What Morality is Not”, Philosophy , XXXII , Mr. Alasdair Maclntyre argues against the view, now common, “that universal–izability is of the essence of moral valuation”. On page 331 he uses an argument which is an adaptation and extension of Moore's naturalistic fallacy argument, and which is generalizable. As Moore's argument, if cogent, holds against all definitions of “good”, “right”, etc., so Maclntyre's argument, if good, holds against all definitions of “moral” and “morality”. For this reason I shall examine (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34. Moore's Naturalistic Fallacy.David P. Gauthier - 1967 - American Philosophical Quarterly 4 (4):315 - 320.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35. A Note on the Naturalistic Fallacy.George R. Geiger - 1949 - Philosophy of Science 16 (4):336-342.
  36. Lawrence Kohlberg and G. E. Moore on the Naturalistic Fallacy.James M. Giarelli - 1976 - Educational Theory 26 (4):348-354.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37. Avoiding the Super-Naturalistic Fallacy: Practical Reasoning and the Insightful Undergraduate.Steven Gimbel - 2002 - Journal of Thought 37 (3).
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38. The Naturalistic Fallacy in Ethical Discourse on the Social Determinants of Health.Daniel Goldberg - 2015 - American Journal of Bioethics 15 (3):58-60.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  39. Business Ethics, Ideology, and the Naturalistic Fallacy.Kenneth E. Goodpaster - 1985 - Journal of Business Ethics 4 (4):227 - 232.
    This paper addresses the relationship between theoretical and applied ethics. It directs philosophical attention toward the concept of ideology, conceived as a bridge between high-level principles and decision-making practice. How are we to understand this bridge and how can we avoid the naturalistic fallacy while taking ideology seriously?It is then suggested that the challenge posed by ideology in the arena of organizational ethics is in many ways similar to the challenge posed by developmentalist accounts of moral stages in the arena (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  40. Is the Naturalistic Fallacy Dead (and If So, Ought It Be?).Oren Harman - 2012 - Journal of the History of Biology 45 (3):557 - 572.
    Much of modern moral philosophy argued that there are is's in this world, and there are oughts, but that the two are entirely independent of one another. What this meant was that morality had nothing to do with man's biological nature, and could not be derived from it. Any such attempt was considered to be a categorical mistake, and plain foolish. Most philosophers still believe this, but a growing group of neonaturalist thinkers are now challenging their assumptions. Here I consider (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41. Is the Naturalistic Fallacy Dead.Oren Harman - 2012 - Journal of the History of Biology 45 (3):557-572.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42. Institutional Facts and the Naturalistic Fallacy. Confronting Searle with Searle.Frank Hindriks - 2002 - ProtoSociology 16:170-192.
    In 1964 Searle argued against the naturalistic fallacy thesis that an ought-statement can in fact be derived from is-statements. From an analysis of this argument and of Searle’s social ontology of 1995 – which includes a full-blown theory of institutional facts – I conclude that this argument is unsound on his own terms. The conclusion that can now be drawn from Searle’s argument is that social or institutional obligations are epistemically objective even though they are observer-dependent. I go on to (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43. Igniting the Deontic Consequence Relation: Dilemmas, Trumping, and the Naturalistic Fallacy.Kurt Holukoff - unknown
    In this work, Kurt Holukoff examines three formal approaches to representing valid inferences in reasoning regarding obligation and its cognates: deontic logic. He argues that an appropriate formalization of deontic logic should take genuine moral dilemmas seriously, be capable of representing trumping-like reasoning, and not make the naturalistic fallacy valid as a matter of logic. The three systems he investigates are, the Standard Deontic logic, a Relevant Deontic logic, and Schotch and Jennings’ multiple moral accessibility relations Deontic logic. The Standard (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44. «I Deal I St Icf» Os Iti Ons Im Naturalistic Ethics.Jacek Jastal - 1995 - In Eugeniusz Kulwicki (ed.), Selected Problems of Economics, Sociology and Philosophy. Politechnika Krakowska. pp. 7--65.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45. Theological Ethics and The Naturalistic Fallacy.John P. Crossley Jr - 1978 - Journal of Religious Ethics 6 (1):121 - 134.
    Theological ethics is vulnerable to the charge made by some philosophical ethicists that it frequently commits the "naturalistic fallacy," i.e., that it fallaciously derives duties and obligations from purely descriptive theological premises. Some theological ethicists, acceding to the charge, have contented themselves with an examination of how theological ethics might "influence" or "enrich" ethical propositions based on non-theological foundations. This essay analyzes the current scene in theological ethics and argues that the "naturalistic fallacy" is not the real danger. The real (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46. Naturalistic Fallacy : Does Spinoza Commit This Fallacy?Meena Kelkar - 1983 - Indian Philosophical Quarterly 10 (3):303.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47. The Possibility of Metaphysics: Environmental Ethics and the Naturalistic Fallacy.Andrew J. Kerr - 2000 - Environmental Ethics 22 (1):85-99.
    One of the most distinguishing features of environmental ethics has been the effort to develop a nonanthropocentric intrinsic value theory, that is, a definition of the good which is not dependent upon some quality particular to humanity, a definition of the good whereby properties found in the terrestrial, nonhuman world are constitutive of that definition. In this paper, I argue that major nonanthropocentric theories suffer from arbitrariness. I argue through the use of representative thinkers that much nonathropocentric theory has committed (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48. The Ghost of the Naturalistic Fallacy.Aurel Kolnai - 1980 - Philosophy 55 (211):5 - 16.
    In 1952, having for the first time to give a lecture in Madrid, I said somewhat dejectedly to the able and witty young man entrusted with the tedious task of revising the Spanish of my text that I found my lecture didn't amount to much: it was but a long paraphrase of one single idea. Perhaps I hoped for an enthusiastic protest on his part. But he only offered as solace the terse remark: ‘Well, I have heard many a lecture (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49. Facts and Values: Is There a Naturalistic Fallacy?Moshe Kroy - 1975 - Reason Papers 2:29-39.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50. Normative-Descriptive and the Naturalistic Fallacy.Laurens Landeweerd - 2004 - Global Bioethics 17 (1):17-23.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 102