This category needs an editor. We encourage you to help if you are qualified.
Volunteer, or read more about what this involves.
About this topic
Summary Theories of free will focus on two basic questions: its possibility and its nature. The possibility question is almost always concerned principally with whether freedom is compatible with causal determinism, as well as with closely related (putative) threats like God's foreknowledge. Philosophers may be either compatibilists or incompatibilists with regard to the relation between freedom and determinism. Of course philosophers are particularly concerned with whether free will is actual. Questions of the nature of free will are usually addressed in conjunction with the compatibility question: philosophers develop accounts of free will in order to show that it is or is not compatible with causal determinism. The typology of these accounts appears under the sibling category "topics in free will".
Key works Contemporary theorists of free will divide into compatibilists, incompatibilists and impossibilists in the main. The most important contemporary compatibilist is probably John Martin Fischer (Fischer & Ravizza 1998) though real self views are increasingly influential (Arpaly 2002Scanlon 2008). Incompatibilists traditionally divide into hard determinists, who hold that free will is incompatible with determinism and determinism is true and libertarians. Libertarians, in turn, divide into agent-causal theorists (e.g. O'Connor 2000) and event-causal theorists (e.g. Kane 1996). Impossibilism has never been popular but seems to be growing slightly (see for instance Strawson 1994). Derk Pereboom's near-impossibilism is also influential (Pereboom 2001). 
Introductions O'Connor 2005;McKenna 2008; Clarke & Capes ms; Levy & McKenna 2009
  Show all references
Related categories
Subcategories:See also:
3387 found
Search inside:
(import / add options)   Order:
1 — 50 / 3387
Material to categorize
  1. C. P. A. (1957). Freedom of the Will. [REVIEW] Review of Metaphysics 11 (1):163-163.
  2. Nicola Abbagnano (1957). Possibilità E Libertà. Journal of Philosophy 54 (3):78-80.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3. Natalie Abrams (1972). Free-Will and Moral Responsibility in the Works of Charles Arthur Campbell. Dissertation, Columbia University
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4. Todd Llewellyn Adams (1986). The American Commonsense Philosophers on Determinism and Agent Causality. Dissertation, University of Kentucky
    The focus of this dissertation is on the American commonsense philosophers in the first half of the nineteenth century. The primary issue dealt with is the agency theory of these philosophers and how that related to the debate concerning freedom and determinism. The essential Americans in this debate are Alexander Campbell, Asa Mahan, Henry Tappan, and Thomas Upham. Each one was committed to the fundamental principles of the commonsense philosophy, and so supported the view that man acts freely. They were (...)
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5. Christian Adelt (1970). Die Letzte Revolution. F. Schöningh.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6. Admin (2015). Ii Blasco Disputatio: Does Free Will Require Alternative Possibilities? Blasco Disputatio is a Yearly Workshop Designed to Promote the Discussion on Topics in Epistemology, Metaphysics, the Philosophy of Mind and the Philosophy of Language. Each Edition of This Workshop Focuses on a Particular Issue to Be Disputed by Two Invited Speakers That Will Defend Divergent, If Not Opposing, Views. A Call for Papers Will Be Made for Contributions That Will Explore Further Aspects of the Topic. The 2016 Edition of the Blasco Disputatio Will Be Mainly Focused on the Question of Whether Free Will Requires Alternative Possibilities and on the Role of Causation in a Proper Understanding of Freedom, but It is Open to Discussing Any Related Issues in Metaphysics and the Philosophy of Action. The Invited Papers, Together with a Selection of the Submitted Papers, Will Appear on a Special Issue in the Journal Disputatio. [REVIEW] Disputatio.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7. John Christopher Adorno (ed.) (forthcoming). Being, Freedom, and Method: Themes From the Philosophy of Peter van Inwagen.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8. Archibald B. D. Alexander (1908). Kuno Fischer: An Estimate of His Life and Work. Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods 5 (3):57-64.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9. John Gerald Alexander (1970). An Examination of the Problem of Physical Determinism. Dissertation, University of Oregon
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10. David Alm (2015). Responsibility, Manipulation, and Resentment. Social Theory and Practice 41 (2):253-274.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11. Peter Alward, Comments on Heidi Tiedke’s €Œis Knowledge Ever Constitutive of Freedom?€.
               According to Tiedke, in order for an act to be free it must satisfy two requirements: (PR) The agent must have been the source of the action. (PAP) It must have been possible for the agent to have done otherwise. Different accounts of freedom cash these conditions out in different ways. The Standard Compatibilist offers the following versions of these principles: (PRSC) The agent’s choice was a link in the (...)
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12. Elizabeth Anderson (2005). Rationality and Freedom. Philosophical Review 114 (2):253-271.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13. Chrisoula Andreou (2003). Amartya Sen, Rationality and Freedom Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 23 (3):217-220.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14. Chrisoula Andreou (2003). Amartya Sen, Rationality and Freedom. [REVIEW] Philosophy in Review 23:217-220.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15. G. E. M. Anscombe (1971). Causality and Determinism. Cambridge University Press.
    I IT is often declared or evidently assumed that causality is some kind of necessary connexion, or alternatively, that being caused is — non-trivially ...
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   20 citations  
  16. Thomas Anselm & Williams (2002). Three Philosophical Dialogues on Truth, on Freedom of Choice, on the Fall of the Devil.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17. Jose Antonio Guerrero del Amo (2009). Determinism Versus Freedom in Freud. Pensamiento 65 (243):117-142.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18. Shigeru åowada (1993). Jiyåujin No Kiseki Kindai No Bungaku to Shisåo. Musashino Shobåo.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19. David Archard (1990). Freedom Not to Be Free. Philosophical Quarterly 40 (161):453.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  20. Denise T. Askin (2004). Anagogical Vision and Comedic Form in Flannery O'Connor. Renascence 57 (1):47-62.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21. Robert N. Audi (1974). Moral Responsibility, Freedom, and Compulsion. American Philosophical Quarterly 11 (January):1-14.
    This paper sets out and defends an account of free action and explores the relation between free action and moral responsibility. Free action is analyzed as a certain kind of uncompelled action. The notion of compulsion is explicated in detail, And several forms of compulsion are distinguished and compared. It is argued that contrary to what is usually supposed, A person may be morally responsible for doing something even if he did not do it freely. On the basis of the (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  22. A. J. Ayer (1990). The Meaning of Life and Other Essays.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23. A. M. B. (1974). Liberty and Community. Review of Metaphysics 28 (2):359-360.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24. E. B. (1879). La terminologie de M. Shadworth Hodgson. Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 7:477 - 479.
    Remove from this list  
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25. J. E. B. (1957). The Road to Inner Freedom. Review of Metaphysics 11 (1):168-168.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26. Bernard Baertschi & Alexandre Mauron (2011). Genetic Determinism, Neuronal Determinism, and Determinism Tout Court. In Judy Illes & Barbara J. Sahakian (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Neuroethics. Oxford University Press. pp. 151.
    This article analyses neuronal determinism and mentions that at first sight it appears to be a type of qualified determinism. Neurodeterminism is better conceived as determinism tout court when it is applied to human beings. It differs importantly from genetic determinism, together the two views that are often regarded as similar in form if not in content. Moreover, the article examines the question of genetic determinism, because it is a paradigm of qualified determinism. It then explains the meaning of determinism (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27. Julian Baggini (2001). Conference Briefing 30 Free Will and Determinism Ron Wilburn Et Al. The Philosophers' Magazine 13.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28. Julian Baggini (2000). Free to Choose. The Philosophers' Magazine 11:37-40.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29. Oded Balaban & Anan Erev (1995). The Bounds of Freedom About the Eastern and Western Approaches to Freedom.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30. Mark Balaguer (2012). Replies to McKenna, Pereboom, and Kane. Philosophical Studies (1):1-22.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31. Frank Ballard (1911). Determinism: False and True.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32. Albert Bandura (1983). Temporal Dynamics and Decomposition of Reciprocal Determinism: A Reply to Phillips and Orton. Psychological Review 90 (2):166-170.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33. Frédéric-Ismaël Banville (2012). Implementing Revisionism: Assessing a Revisionist Theory of Moral Responsibility. Ithaque 10:115-135.
    The aim of this paper is to examine a particular substantive theory among others in the set of “revisionist” theories of moral responsibility, namely, Manuel Vargas’ version of the moral influence account of the justification of responsibility- specific practices. Moderate revisionism, which Vargas endorses, advocates a clear distinction between descriptive and normative questions, which enables a naturalistically plausible account of responsibility that does not jeopardize the normative aspect. However, while Vargas provides a useful framework for thinking about revisionism, I argue (...)
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34. Eric Christian Barnes (2015). Freedom, Creativity, and Manipulation. Noûs 49 (3):560-588.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   18 citations  
  35. Michael Barram (forthcoming). Book Review: Less Than Two Dollars a Day: A Christian View of World Poverty and the Free Market. [REVIEW] Interpretation 62 (4):450-450.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  36. Cyril Barrett (1973). Freedom of Mind and Other Essays. Philosophical Books 14 (2):7-9.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37. Z. Bauman (1991). The Social Manipulation of Morality: Moralizing Actors, Adiaphorizing Action. Theory, Culture and Society 8 (1):137-151.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  38. L. W. Beals (1961). An Imputation Theory of Free Will. In Gerald E. Myers (ed.), Self, Religion, and Metaphysics. New York: Macmillan.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39. Lawrence C. Becker (1971). Determinism as a Rhetorical Problem. Philosophy and Rhetoric 4 (1):20 - 28.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40. Helen Beebee (2014). Radical Indeterminism and Top-Down Causation. Res Philosophica 91 (3):537-545.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41. Yemima Ben-Menahem (2007). Free Creations of the Human Mind. Iyyun 56:141.
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42. Erica Benner (2009). Chapter 6. Free Agency and Desires for Freedom. In Machiavelli's Ethics. Princeton University Press. pp. 213-253.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43. Paul Benson (1994). Free Agency and Self-Worth. Journal of Philosophy 91 (12):650-668.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  44. Paul H. Benson (1987). Ordinary Ability and Free Action. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 17 (June):307-335.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45. Paul H. Benson (1984). Freedom and Criticism: An Account of Free Action. Dissertation, Princeton University
    This essay attempts to develop an account of the abilities which free action involves. I argue that the notion of ability which is especially relevant for the purpose of understanding free action is correctly given a compatibilist interpretation. More importantly, it turns out that persons who act freely have the ability to do otherwise than they do. Acting with the ability to do otherwise is not a distinctive mark of free action, however, since anyone who merely acts intentionally possesses that (...)
    Remove from this list  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46. Mark Bernstein (1988). Justification and Determinism - An Exchange. The Monist 71 (3):358-364.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47. Bernard Berofsky (1999). The Question of Free Will: A Holistic View. [REVIEW] International Studies in Philosophy 31 (4):142-143.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48. Bernard Berofsky (1964). Determinism and the Concept of a Person. Journal of Philosophy 61 (September):461-475.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49. Bernard Berofsky, R. L. Franklin, Corliss Lamont & Edward D'Angelo (1970). Freewill and Determinism.Freedom of Choice Affirmed.The Problem of Freedom and Determinism. Journal of Philosophy 67 (7):208.
    Remove from this list   Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50. A. Bers, R. Fox, C. G. Kuper & S. G. Lipson (1971). The Impossibility of Free Tachyons. In Charles Goethe Kuper & Asher Peres (eds.), Relativity and Gravitation. New York: Gordon and Breach Science Publishers. pp. 41.
    Remove from this list   Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 3387