Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Fine‐tuning, weird sorts of atheism and evidential favouring.Tamaz Tokhadze - 2021 - Analytic Philosophy (3):1-12.
    This paper defends a novel sceptical response to the fine-tuning argument for the existence of God (FTA). According to this response, even if FTA can establish, what I call, the confirmation proposition: ‘fine-tuning confirms the God hypothesis’, there is no reason to think that a strengthening of FTA can establish the evidence-favouring proposition: ‘fine-tuning favours the God hypothesis over its competitors’. My argument is that, any criteria for the explanation of fine-tuning that permit us to take the God hypothesis seriously (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Recent Work on Traditional Arguments for Theism I.Chad A. McIntosh - 2022 - Philosophy Compass 17 (7):e12854.
    Philosophy Compass, Volume 17, Issue 7, July 2022.
    No categories
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Sometimes Size Does Not Matter.Robert J. Marks, Ola Hössjer & Daniel Andrés Díaz-Pachón - 2022 - Foundations of Physics 53 (1):1-29.
    AbstractRecently Díaz, Hössjer and Marks presented a Bayesian framework to measure cosmological tuning that uses maximum entropy distributions on unbounded sample spaces as priors for the parameters of the physical models. The DHM framework stands in contrast to previous attempts to measure tuning that rely on a uniform prior assumption. However, since the parameters of the models often take values in spaces of infinite size, the uniformity assumption is unwarranted. This is known as the normalization problem. In this paper we (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark