Citations of work:

Robert P. Abelson (1980). Searle's Argument is Just a Set of Chinese Symbols.

Order:
Are we missing citations?

PhilPapers citations & references are currently in beta testing. We expect to add many more in the future.

Meanwhile, you can use our bibliography tool to import references for this or another work.

Or you can directly add citations for the above work:

  1. The Logic of Searle's Chinese Room Argument.Robert I. Damper - 2006 - Minds and Machines 16 (2):163-183.
    Direct download (11 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2.  67
    Computation and Intentionality: A Recipe for Epistemic Impasse.Itay Shani - 2005 - Minds and Machines 15 (2):207-228.
    Searle’s celebrated Chinese room thought experiment was devised as an attempted refutation of the view that appropriately programmed digital computers literally are the possessors of genuine mental states. A standard reply to Searle, known as the “robot reply” (which, I argue, reflects the dominant approach to the problem of content in contemporary philosophy of mind), consists of the claim that the problem he raises can be solved by supplementing the computational device with some “appropriate” environmental hookups. I argue that not (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation