- Statutory Interpretation: Pragmatics and Argumentation.Douglas Walton, Fabrizio Macagno & Giovanni Sartor - 2021 - Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.details
|
|
The Concept of Argument: A Philosophical Foundation.Harald R. Wohlrapp - 2014 - Dordrecht NL: Springer.details
|
|
Conflicting Views on Practical Reason. Against Pseudo‐Arguments in Practical Philosophy.Ota Weinberger - 1992 - Ratio Juris 5 (3):252-268.details
|
|
Basic Puzzles of Discourse Philosophy.Ota Weinberger - 1996 - Ratio Juris 9 (2):172-181.details
|
|
Teleological Justification of Argumentation Schemes.Douglas Walton & Giovanni Sartor - 2013 - Argumentation 27 (2):111-142.details
|
|
Charles Sanders Peirce, A Mastermind of (Legal) Arguments.Vadim Verenich - 2012 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 25 (1):31-55.details
|
|
Robert Alexy and the Dual Nature of Law.Torben Spaak - 2020 - Ratio Juris 33 (2):150-168.details
|
|
Use and Misuse of Language in Judicial Decision-Making: Russian Experience. [REVIEW]Anita Soboleva - 2013 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 26 (3):673-692.details
|
|
Interpreting Statutes. A Comparative Study.Raimo Siltala - 1993 - Ratio Juris 6 (3):350-356.details
|
|
A Fossilised Constitution?Virgilio Afonso da Silva - 2004 - Ratio Juris 17 (4):454-473.details
|
|
Editors' introduction.Henry Prakken & Giovanni Sartor - 1996 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 4 (3-4):157-161.details
|
|
Reconstructing and Evaluating Genetic Arguments in Judicial Decisions.H. José Plug - 2005 - Argumentation 19 (4):447-458.details
|
|
Non-individualism, rights, and practical reason.George Pavlakos - 2008 - Ratio Juris 21 (1):66-93.details
|
|
Rhetoric Meets Rational Argumentation Theory.Mirjami Paso - 2014 - Ratio Juris 27 (2):236-251.details
|
|
The Limits of Institutionalised Legal Discourse.Emmanuel Melissaris - 2005 - Ratio Juris 18 (4):464-483.details
|
|
The Irish Public Discourse on Covid-19 at the Intersection of Legislation, Fake News and Judicial Argumentation.Davide Mazzi - 2022 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 35 (3):1233-1252.details
|
|
“This Argument Fails for Two Reasons…”: A Linguistic Analysis of Judicial Evaluation Strategies in US Supreme Court Judgments. [REVIEW]Davide Mazzi - 2010 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 23 (4):373-385.details
|
|
On transparent law, good legislation and accessibility to legal information: Towards an integrated legal information system.Doris Liebwald - 2015 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 23 (3):301-314.details
|
|
Law’s Capacity for Vagueness.Doris Liebwald - 2013 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 26 (2):391-423.details
|
|
Taking Rights less Seriously. A Structural Analysis of Judicial Discretion.Matthias Klatt - 2007 - Ratio Juris 20 (4):506-529.details
|
|
E Contrario Reasoning: The Dilemma of the Silent Legislator.Henrike Jansen - 2005 - Argumentation 19 (4):485-496.details
|
|
The Public Sphere and the Norms of Transactional Argument.Jean Goodwin - 2005 - Informal Logic 25 (2):151-165.details
|
|
Some Problems with Robert Alexy's Account of Legal Validity: The Relevance of the Participant's Perspective.Paula Gaido - 2012 - Ratio Juris 25 (3):381-392.details
|
|
The Rational Reconstruction of Argumentation Referring to Consequences and Purposes in the Application of Legal Rules: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective.Eveline T. Feteris - 2005 - Argumentation 19 (4):459-470.details
|
|
The Pragma-Dialectical Analysis and Evaluation of Teleological Argumentation in a Legal Context.Eveline T. Feteris - 2008 - Argumentation 22 (4):489-506.details
|
|
The rational reconstruction of weighing and balancing on the basis of teleological-evaluative considerations in the justification of judicial decisions.Eveline T. Feteris - 2008 - Ratio Juris 21 (4):481-495.details
|
|
A Pragma-Dialectical Approach to Legal Discussions.Eveline T. Feteris - 1993 - Informal Logic 15 (3).details
|
|
Arguments against Ronald Dworkin’s liberal egalitarianism.Andrea Luisa Bucchile Faggion - 2017 - Filosofia Unisinos 18 (3):146-154.details
|
|
Argument from Analogy in Law, the Classical Tradition, and Recent Theories.Fabrizio Macagno & Douglas Walton - 2009 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 42 (2):154-182.details
|
|
Eveline T. Feteris: Fundamentals of legal argumentation: Springer, 2017, 2nd edn, pp. 363.T. J. M. Bench-Capon - 2018 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 26 (3):307-314.details
|
|
Argumentation schemes in AI and Law.Katie Atkinson & Trevor Bench-Capon - 2021 - Argument and Computation 12 (3):417-434.details
|
|
Los sesgos cognitivos y la legitimidad racional de las decisiones judiciales.Andrés Páez - 2021 - In Federico Arena, Pau Luque & Diego Moreno Cruz (eds.), Razonamiento Jurídico y Ciencias Cognitivas. Bogotá: Universidad Externado de Colombia. pp. 187-222.details
|
|
Legal Norms as Linguistic conventions.Boyan Bahanov - 2020 - In Annual of Sofia University St. Kliment Ohridski, Faculty of Philosophy, Postgraduate Students Book, Volume 4. Sofia University Press. pp. 15-30.details
|
|
Recognizing Argument Types and Adding Missing Reasons.Christoph Lumer - 2019 - In Bart J. Garssen, David Godden, Gordon Mitchell & Jean Wagemans (eds.), Proceedings of the Ninth Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (ISSA). [Amsterdam, July 3-6, 2018.]. Amsterdam (Netherlands): pp. 769-777.details
|
|
The informal use of Reductio ad Absurdum.Henrike Jansen - unknowndetails
|
|
A Review of the LSAT Using Literature on Legal Reasoning.Gilbert E. Plumer - 2000 - Law School Admission Council Computerized Testing Report 97 (8):1-19.details
|
|
The role of Arguments from Consequences in Practical Argumentation.Eveline T. Feteris - unknowndetails
|
|
Fallacies and the preconditions of argumentation.Chris Campolo - unknowndetails
|
|