Citations of work:

Jonas Rafael Becker Arenhart & Décio Krause (2012). Why Non-Individuality? A Discussion on Individuality, Identity, and Cardinality in the Quantum Context.

Are we missing citations?

PhilPapers citations & references are currently in beta testing. We expect to add many more in the future.

Meanwhile, you can use our bibliography tool to import references for this or another work.

Or you can directly add citations for the above work:

Search for work by author name and title
Add directly by record ID

  1.  10
    Entities Without Identity: A Semantical Dilemma.Benjamin C. Jantzen - forthcoming - Erkenntnis:1-26.
    It has been suggested that puzzles in the interpretation of quantum mechanics motivate consideration of entities that are numerically distinct but do not stand in a relation of identity with themselves or non-identity with others. Quite apart from metaphysical concerns, I argue that talk about such entities is either meaningless or not about such entities. It is meaningless insofar as we attempt to take the foregoing characterization literally. It is meaningful, however, if talk about entities without identity is taken as (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Export citation  
  2.  54
    Is Identity Really so Fundamental?Décio Krause & Jonas R. Becker Arenhart - forthcoming - Foundations of Science:1-21.
    We critically examine the claim that identity is a fundamental concept. According to those putting forward this thesis, there are four related reasons that can be called upon to ground the fundamental character of identity: identity is presupposed in every conceptual system; identity is required to characterize individuality; identity cannot be defined; the intelligibility of quantification requires identity. We address each of these points and argue that none of them advances compelling reasons to hold that identity is fundamental; in fact, (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
    Export citation  
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  3.  55
    Entities Without Intrinsic Physical Identity.Vincent Lam - 2014 - Erkenntnis 79 (5):1157-1171.
    This paper critically discusses recent objections that have been raised against the contextual understanding of fundamental physical objects advocated by non-eliminative ontic structural realism. One of these recent objections claims that such a purely relational understanding of objects cannot account for there being a determinate number of them. A more general objection concerns a well-known circularity threat: relations presuppose the objects they relate and so cannot account for them. A similar circularity objection has also been raised within the framework of (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
    Export citation  
    Bookmark   4 citations