Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. The Logical Burdens of Proof. Assertion and Hypothesis.Daniele Chiffi & Fabien Schang - 2017 - Logic and Logical Philosophy 26 (4):1-22.
    The paper proposes two logical analyses of (the norms of) justification. In a first, realist-minded case, truth is logically independent from justification and leads to a pragmatic logic LP including two epistemic and pragmatic operators, namely, assertion and hypothesis. In a second, antirealist-minded case, truth is not logically independent from justification and results in two logical systems of information and justification: AR4 and AR4¢, respectively, provided with a question-answer semantics. The latter proposes many more epistemic agents, each corresponding to a (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Errata Corrige to “Pragmatic and Dialogic Interpretation of Bi-Intuitionism. Part I”.Gianluigi Bellin, Massimiliano Carrara, Daniele Chiffi & Alessandro Menti - 2016 - Logic and Logical Philosophy 25 (2).
  • Abductive Inference Within a Pragmatic Framework.Daniele Chiffi & Ahti-Veikko Pietarinen - forthcoming - Synthese:1-17.
    This paper presents an enrichment of the Gabbay–Woods schema of Peirce’s 1903 logical form of abduction with illocutionary acts, drawing from logic for pragmatics and its resources to model justified assertions. It analyses the enriched schema and puts it into the perspective of Peirce’s logic and philosophy.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations