Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. The moral foundations of equipoise and its role in international research.Alex John London - 2006 - American Journal of Bioethics 6 (4):48 – 51.
    In “The Real Problem With Equipoise,” Chiong (2006) raises two distinct, but interrelated issues concerning the concept of equipoise. The first deals with the role of equipoise in evaluating intern...
    Direct download (4 more)  
    Export citation  
    Bookmark   8 citations  
  • Can Culture Justify Infant Circumcision?Eldar Sarajlic - 2014 - Res Publica 20 (4):327-343.
    The paper addresses arguments in the recent philosophical and bioethical literature claiming that social and cultural benefits can justify non-therapeutic male infant circumcision. It rejects these claims by referring to the open future argument, according to which infant circumcision is morally unjustifiable because it violates the child’s right to an open future. The paper also addresses an important objection to the open future argument and examines the strength of the objection to refute the application of the argument to the circumcision (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Export citation  
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Still Quiet After All These Years: Revisiting “The Silence of the Bioethicists”.James Lindemann Nelson - 2012 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 9 (3):249-259.
    Some 14 years ago, I published an article in which I identified a prime site for bioethicists to ply their trade: medical responses to requests for hormonal and surgical interventions aimed at facilitating transgendered people’s transition to their desired genders. Deep issues about the impact of biotechnologies and health care practices on central aspects of our conceptual system, I argued, were raised by how doctors understood and responded to people seeking medical assistance in changing their gender, and there were obviously (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
    Export citation  
    Bookmark   2 citations