Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Why circumcision is a biomedical imperative for the 21 st century.Brian J. Morris - 2007 - Bioessays 29 (11):1147-1158.
    Circumcision of males represents a surgical “vaccine“ against a wide variety of infections, adverse medical conditions and potentially fatal diseases over their lifetime, and also protects their sexual partners. In experienced hands, this common, inexpensive procedure is very safe, can be pain‐free and can be performed at any age. The benefits vastly outweigh risks. The enormous public health benefits include protection from urinary tract infections, sexually transmitted HIV, HPV, syphilis and chancroid, penile and prostate cancer, phimosis, thrush, and inflammatory dermatoses. (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • What philosophers can contribute in the face of fundamental empirical disagreement: a response to Benatar and Lang.Joseph Mazor - 2013 - Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (7):432-433.
    I wish to first thank the two respondents for seriously engaging with my arguments. Their responses suggest that they are both individuals of good conscience who are deeply committed to the quest for truth and to human welfare.Their responses also highlight the deep empirical disagreements that lie at the heart of the circumcision debate. Given such empirical disagreements, what can philosophers contribute? I wish to reply to my critics in a way that highlights four types of contributions that philosophers can (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark