Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Why circumcision is a biomedical imperative for the 21 st century.Brian J. Morris - 2007 - Bioessays 29 (11):1147-1158.
    Circumcision of males represents a surgical “vaccine“ against a wide variety of infections, adverse medical conditions and potentially fatal diseases over their lifetime, and also protects their sexual partners. In experienced hands, this common, inexpensive procedure is very safe, can be pain‐free and can be performed at any age. The benefits vastly outweigh risks. The enormous public health benefits include protection from urinary tract infections, sexually transmitted HIV, HPV, syphilis and chancroid, penile and prostate cancer, phimosis, thrush, and inflammatory dermatoses. (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Ritual Male Infant Circumcision and Human Rights”.Allan J. Jacobs & Kavita S. Arora - 2015 - American Journal of Bioethics 15 (3):W1 - W4.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Male or female genital cutting: why ‘health benefits’ are morally irrelevant.Brian D. Earp - 2021 - Journal of Medical Ethics 47 (12):e92-e92.
    The WHO, American Academy of Pediatrics and other Western medical bodies currently maintain that all medically unnecessary female genital cutting of minors is categorically a human rights violation, while either tolerating or actively endorsing medically unnecessary male genital cutting of minors, especially in the form of penile circumcision. Given that some forms of female genital cutting, such as ritual pricking or nicking of the clitoral hood, are less severe than penile circumcision, yet are often performed within the same families for (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations