Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Boghossian and Casalegno on Understanding and Inference.Timothy Williamson - 2012 - Dialectica 66 (2):237-247.
    In response to Paul Boghossian's objections in ‘Inferentialism and the epistemology of logic’, this paper defends counterexamples offered by Paolo Casalegno and the author to an inferentialist account of what it is to understand a logical constant, on which Boghossian had relied in his explanation of our entitlement to reason according to basic logical principles. The importance for understanding is stressed of non-inferential aspects of the use of logical constants. Boghossian's criteria for individuating concepts are also queried.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Boghossian and Casalegno on Understanding and Inference.Timothy Williamson - 2012 - Dialectica 66 (2):237-247.
  • Meaning-Constitutive Inferences.Matej Drobňák - 2017 - Organon F: Medzinárodný Časopis Pre Analytickú Filozofiu 24 (1):85-104.
    ABSTRACT: A traditional objection to inferentialism states that not all inferences can be meaning-constitutive and therefore inferentialism has to comprise an analytic-synthetic distinction. As a response, Peregrin argues that meaning is a matter of inferential rules and only the subset of all the valid inferences for which there is a widely shared corrective behaviour corresponds to rules and so determines meaning. Unfortunately, Peregrin does not discuss what counts as “widely shared”. In the paper, I argue for an empirical plausibility of (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Synonymy and the a Priori: A Problem for Boghossian’s Model.Fredrik Nyseth - 2017 - Analysis 77 (3):559-565.
    According to Paul Boghossian, some truths are knowable a priori because they are expressed by epistemically analytic sentences. In such cases, understanding the sentence is meant to suffice for justified belief in the proposition it expresses. One alleged route from understanding to justification goes via what Boghossian calls ‘the synonymy model’. This article presents a dilemma for this model and argues that although a strategy for avoiding the dilemma is available, this does not vindicate Boghossian's model.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Le Problème de la Justification des Lois Logiques de Base.Patrice Philie - 2016 - Dialogue 55 (3):407-428.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Semantic Facts and a Priori Knowledge.Fredrik Nyseth - 2017 - Philosophy 92 (2):297-304.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Paolo Casalegno's Good Points.Elisa Paganini - 2012 - Dialectica 66 (2):215-219.
    No categories
    Direct download (7 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark