Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Distributing Indivisible Goods Fairly: Evidence from a Questionnaire Study.Dorothea K. Herreiner & Clemens Puppe - 2007 - Analyse & Kritik 29 (2):235-258.
    We report the results of a questionnaire study on the fair distribution of indivisible goods. We collected data from three different subject pools, first- and second- year students majoring in economics, law students, and advanced economics students with some background knowledge of fairness theories. The purpose of this study is to assess the empirical relevance of various fairness criteria such as inequality aversion, the utilitarian principle of maximizing the sum of individual payoffs, the Rawlsian “maximin” principle of maximizing the payoff (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Mathematics: The science of patterns by Keith Devlin.Olga Yiparaki - 1999 - Complexity 4 (4):55-60.
  • Fair division of indivisible items between two players: design parameters for Contested Pile methods. [REVIEW]Rudolf Vetschera & D. Marc Kilgour - 2014 - Theory and Decision 76 (4):547-572.
    Contested Pile methods are two-phase procedures for the fair allocation of indivisible items to two players. In the Generation Phase, items over which the players’ preferences differ widely enough are allocated. “Contested” items are placed in the Contested Pile, which is then allocated in the Splitting Phase. Each phase can be carried out using several different techniques; we perform a comprehensive analysis of the resulting design variants using a computational model. The properties of fairness and efficiency, generally achieved in the (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • The Social Ontology of Deliberating Bodies.Philippe Urfalino - 2017 - Journal of Political Philosophy 25 (4):387-410.
    This article is a plea for a realist view of deliberative bodies against a nominalist view. They cannot be reduced to the changing collection of the individuals who compose it. The deliberative bodies are real collective entities insofar as we are able to precise their criteria of identity. These are the differentiation between an interior and an exterior linked by functions or ends; thus these collective entities are adaptive systems. There are three kinds of such adaptive systems: technical systems, organisms (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Implementing equal division with an ultimatum threat.Esat Doruk Cetemen & Emin Karagözoğlu - 2014 - Theory and Decision 77 (2):223-236.
    We modify the payment rule of the standard divide the dollar (DD) game by introducing a second stage and thereby resolve the multiplicity problem and implement equal division of the dollar in equilibrium. In the standard DD game, if the sum of players’ demands is less than or equal to a dollar, each player receives what he demanded; if the sum of demands is greater than a dollar, all players receive zero. We modify this second part, which involves a harsh (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • Developing negotiation decision support systems that support mediators: A case study of the family_winner system. [REVIEW]Emilia Bellucci & John Zeleznikow - 2005 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 13 (2):233-271.
    Negotiation Support Systems have traditionally modelled the process of negotiation. They often rely on mathematical optimisation techniques and ignore heuristics and other methods derived from practice. Our goal is to develop systems capable of decision support to help resolve a given dispute. A system we have constructed, Family_Winner, uses empirical evidence to dynamically modify initial preferences throughout the negotiation process. It sequentially allocates issues using trade-offs and compensation opportunities inherent in the dispute.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations