Citations of work:

David H. Brendel (2003). Reductionism, Eclecticism, and Pragmatism in Psychiatry: The Dialectic of Clinical Explanation.

5 found
Are we missing citations?

PhilPapers citations & references are currently in beta testing. We expect to add many more in the future.

Meanwhile, you can use our bibliography tool to import references for this or another work.

Or you can directly add citations for the above work:

Search for work by author name and title
Add directly by record ID

  1.  2
    Staging the Truth.Roberto Brigati - 2015 - European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy 7 (1).
  2.  74
    A Plea for Pragmatism in Clinical Research Ethics.David H. Brendel & Franklin G. Miller - 2008 - American Journal of Bioethics 8 (4):24 – 31.
    Pragmatism is a distinctive approach to clinical research ethics that can guide bioethicists and members of institutional review boards (IRBs) as they struggle to balance the competing values of promoting medical research and protecting human subjects participating in it. After defining our understanding of pragmatism in the setting of clinical research ethics, we show how a pragmatic approach can provide guidance not only for the day-to-day functioning of the IRB, but also for evaluation of policy standards, such as the one (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
    Export citation  
    Bookmark   17 citations  
  3.  22
    Evidence‐Based Psychiatry: Understanding the Limitations of a Method.Thomas Maier - 2006 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 12 (3):325-329.
  4. Can There Be a 'Cosmetic' Psychopharmacology? Prozac Unplugged: The Search for an Ontologically Distinct Cosmetic Psychopharmacology.Pamela Bjorklund - 2005 - Nursing Philosophy 6 (2):131-143.
    Direct download (3 more)  
    Export citation  
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  5.  26
    Psychiatry Under Pressure: Reflections on Psychiatry’s Drift Towards a Reductionist Biomedical Conception of Mental Illness. [REVIEW]Thomas R. V. Nys & Maurits G. Nys - 2005 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 9 (1):107-115.
    We argue that contemporary psychiatry adopts a defensive strategy vis-à-vis various external sources of pressure. We will identify two of these sources – the plea for individual autonomy and the idea of Managed Care – and explain how they have promoted a strict biomedical conception of disease. The demand for objectivity, however, does not take into account the complexity of mental illness. It ignores that the psychiatrist’s profession is essentially characterized by fragility: fluctuating between scientific reduction and the irreducible complexity (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
    Export citation  
    Bookmark   1 citation