Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Democratic Legitimacy and Economic Liberty.John Tomasi - 2012 - Social Philosophy and Policy 29 (1):50-80.
    Research Articles John Tomasi, Social Philosophy and Policy, FirstView Article.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Global Justice Without End?John Tasioulas - 2005 - Metaphilosophy 36 (1‐2):3-29.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Deserving to Be Lucky: Reflections on the Role of Luck and Desert in Sports.Robert Simon - 2007 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 34 (1):13-25.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   14 citations  
  • Sophisticated Rule Consequentialism: Some Simple Objections.Richard Arneson - 2005 - Philosophical Issues 15 (1):235–251.
    The popularity of rule-consequentialism among philosophers has waxed and waned. Waned, mostly; at least lately. The idea that the morality that ought to claim allegiance is the ideal code of rules whose acceptance by everybody would bring about best consequences became the object of careful analysis about half a century ago, in the writings of J. J. C. Smart, John Rawls, David Lyons, Richard Brandt, Richard Hare, and others.1 They considered utilitarian versions of rule consequentialism but discovered flaws in the (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  • Utilitarianism and Public Justification.Christopher Freiman - 2013 - Journal of Social Philosophy 44 (3):250-269.
  • Is the Free Market Acceptable to Everyone?Matthew Clayton & David Stevens - 2015 - Res Publica 21 (4):363-382.
    In this paper we take issue with two central claims that John Tomasi makes in Free Market Fairness. The first claim is that Rawls’s difference principle can better be realized by free market institutions than it can be by state interventionist regimes such as property-owning democracy or liberal socialism. We argue that Tomasi’s narrow interpretation of the difference principle, which focuses largely on wealth and income, leaves other goods worryingly unsatisfied. The second claim is that a wide set of economic (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark