Switch to: References

Citations of:

What is Epistemic Blame?

Noûs 54 (2):389-407 (2020)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. The Gift of Testimony.Alessandra Tanesini - forthcoming - Episteme:1-18.
    In this paper I argue that in Western contemporary societies testimony is structured by norms of reciprocation and thus is best understood as involving the exchange of gifts rather than, as philosophers and game theorists have tended to presume, market transactions. My argument is based on an initial analysis of the reactive attitudes that are exhibited in testimonial exchanges. I highlight the central role played by the reciprocating attitudes of gratitude and gratification respectively in the recipient and the donor of (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Justifications and Excuses in Epistemology.Daniel Greco - forthcoming - Noûs.
  • Epistemic Judgment and Motivation.Cameron Boult & Sebastian Köhler - forthcoming - Philosophical Quarterly.
    Is there an epistemic analogue of moral motivational internalism? The answer to this question has implications for our understanding of the nature of epistemic normativity. For example, some philosophers have argued from claims that epistemic judgment is not necessarily motivating to the view that epistemic judgment is not normative. This paper examines the options for spelling out an epistemic analogue of moral motivational internalism. It is argued that the most promising approach connects epistemic judgments to doxastic dispositions, which are related (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Epistemically Blameworthy Belief.Jessica Brown - forthcoming - Philosophical Studies:1-20.
    When subjects violate epistemic standards or norms, we sometimes judge them blameworthy rather than blameless. For instance, we might judge a subject blameworthy for dogmatically continuing to believe a claim even after receiving evidence which undermines it. Indeed, the idea that one may be blameworthy for belief is appealed to throughout the contemporary epistemic literature. In some cases, a subject seems blameworthy for believing as she does even though it seems prima facie implausible that she is morally blameworthy or professionally (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark