Citations of work:

Ronald Bruzina (2004). Edmund Husserl and Eugen Fink: Beginnings and Ends in Phenomenology, 1928–1938.

6 found
Are we missing citations?

PhilPapers citations & references are currently in beta testing. We expect to add many more in the future.

Meanwhile, you can use our bibliography tool to import references for this or another work.

Or you can directly add citations for the above work:

Search for work by author name and title
Add directly by record ID

  1.  31
    The Phenomenologizing of Primal-Phenomenality: Husserl and the Boundaries of the Phenomenology of Time.Luis Niel - 2013 - Husserl Studies 29 (3):211-230.
    This paper focuses on the methodical disclosure of the lowest level of the constitution of time in Husserl’s phenomenology of time (especially in the C-Manuscripts), following this leading question: is it at all possible to disclose phenomenologically the primal-phenomenal constituting stream of consciousness? First, I address the different levels of constitution in order to focus on the ultimate level. Second, I analyse the “intentionality” of the primal-stream, by means of differentiating it from act-intentionality. Third, I outline the methodical function of (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
    Export citation  
  2.  20
    The Meontic and the Militant: On Merleau-Ponty’s Relation to Fink∗.Bryan Smyth - 2011 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 19 (5):669 - 699.
    Abstract This paper clarifies the relationship between Merleau-Ponty?s Phenomenology of Perception and Fink?s Sixth Cartesian Meditation with regard to ?the idea of a transcendental theory of method?. Although Fink?s text played a singularly important role in the development of Merleau-Ponty?s postwar thought, contrary to recent claims made by Ronald Bruzina this influence was not positive. Reconstructing the basic methodological claims of each text, in particular with regard to the being of the phenomenologist, the nature of the productivity that makes phenomenology (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
    Export citation  
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  3.  25
    Bob Sandmeyer, Husserl's Constitutive Phenomenology: Its Problem and Promise. [REVIEW]Biagio Tassone - 2011 - Husserl Studies 27 (2):167-172.
  4.  29
    Bob Sandmeyer: Husserl's Constitutive Phenomenology. Its Problem and Promise. [REVIEW]James Dodd - 2010 - Human Studies 33 (2-3):365-370.
  5. Bodily Protentionality.Elizabeth A. Behnke - 2009 - Husserl Studies 25 (3):185-217.
    This investigation explores the methodological implications of choosing an unusual example for phenomenological description (here, a bodily awareness practice allowing spontaneous bodily shifts to occur at the leading edge of the living present); for example, the matters themselves are not pregiven, but must first be brought into view. Only after preliminary clarifications not only of the practice concerned, but also of the very notions of the “body” and of “protentionality” is it possible to provide both static and genetic descriptions of (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
    Export citation  
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  6. Husserl’s Transcendental Philosophy and the Critique of Naturalism.Dermot Moran - 2008 - Continental Philosophy Review 41 (4):401-425.
    Throughout his career, Husserl identifies naturalism as the greatest threat to both the sciences and philosophy. In this paper, I explicate Husserl’s overall diagnosis and critique of naturalism and then examine the specific transcendental aspect of his critique. Husserl agreed with the Neo-Kantians in rejecting naturalism. He has three major critiques of naturalism: First, it (like psychologism and for the same reasons) is ‘countersensical’ in that it denies the very ideal laws that it needs for its own justification. Second, naturalism (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
    Export citation  
    Bookmark   8 citations