Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Inessential features, ineliminable features, and modal logics for model theoretic syntax.Hans-Jörg Tiede - 2008 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 17 (2):217-227.
    While monadic second-order logic (MSO) has played a prominent role in model theoretic syntax, modal logics have been used in this context since its inception. When comparing propositional dynamic logic (PDL) to MSO over trees, Kracht (1997) noted that there are tree languages that can be defined in MSO that can only be defined in PDL by adding new features whose distribution is predictable. He named such features “inessential features”. We show that Kracht’s observation can be extended to other modal (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Should Pregroup Grammars be Adorned with Additional Operations?Joachim Lambek - 2007 - Studia Logica 87 (2-3):343-358.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • On the logic of β -pregroups.Aleksandra Kiślak-Malinowska - 2007 - Studia Logica 87 (2-3):323 - 342.
    In this paper we concentrate mainly on the notion of β-pregroups, which are pregroups (first introduced by Lambek [18] in 1999) enriched with modality operators. β-pregroups were first proposed by Fadda [11] in 2001. The motivation to introduce them was to limit (locally) the associativity in the calculus considered. In this paper we present this new calculus in the form of a rewriting system, prove the very important feature of this system - that in a given derivation the non- expanding (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • On the Logic of β-pregroups.Aleksandra Kiślak-Malinowska - 2007 - Studia Logica 87 (2-3):323-342.
    In this paper we concentrate mainly on the notion of β-pregroups, which are pregroups enriched with modality operators. β-pregroups were first proposed by Fadda [11] in 2001. The motivation to introduce them was to limit the associativity in the calculus considered. In this paper we present this new calculus in the form of a rewriting system, prove the very important feature of this system - that in a given derivation the non- expanding rules must always proceed non-contracting ones in order (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Extended Pregroup Grammars Applied to Natural Languages.Aleksandra Kiślak-Malinowska - 2012 - Logic and Logical Philosophy 21 (3):229-252.
    Pregroups and pregroup grammars were introduced by Lambek in 1999 [14] as an algebraic tool for the syntactic analysis of natural lan-guages. The main focus in that paper was on certain extended pregroup grammars such as pregroups with modalities, product pregroup grammars and tupled pregroup grammars. Their applications to different syntactic structures of natural languages, mainly Polish, are explored/shown here.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Type Logics and Pregroups.Wojciech Buszkowski - 2007 - Studia Logica 87 (2-3):145-169.
    We discuss the logic of pregroups, introduced by Lambek [34], and its connections with other type logics and formal grammars. The paper contains some new ideas and results: the cut-elimination theorem and a normalization theorem for an extended system of this logic, its P-TIME decidability, its interpretation in L1, and a general construction of (preordered) bilinear algebras and pregroups whose universe is an arbitrary monoid.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Learnability of Pregroup Grammars.Denis Béchet, Annie Foret & Isabelle Tellier - 2007 - Studia Logica 87 (2-3):225-252.
    This paper investigates the learnability by positive examples in the sense of Gold of Pregroup Grammars. In a first part, Pregroup Grammars are presented and a new parsing strategy is proposed. Then, theoretical learnability and non-learnability results for subclasses of Pregroup Grammars are proved. In the last two parts, we focus on learning Pregroup Grammars from a special kind of input called feature-tagged examples. A learning algorithm based on the parsing strategy presented in the first part is given. Its validity (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations