Switch to: References

Citations of:

Analysis and Science in Aristotle

State University of New York Press (1997)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Ciencia y dialéctica en Acerca del cielo de Aristóteles.Manuel Berron - 2016 - Ediciones UNL.
  • The Beginnings of Formal Logic: Deduction in Aristotle’s Topics Vs. Prior Analytics.Marko Malink - 2015 - Phronesis 60 (3):267-309.
  • The Liar Paradox as a Reductio Ad Absurdum Argument.Menashe Schwed - unknown
    This presentation traces an historical root of the reductio ad absurdum mode of argumentation in Greek philosophy. I propose a new understanding of the liar paradox as an instance of this mode of argumentation. I show that the paradox was crea ted as part of a refutational argument in the controversy over the justification of realism and the realists concepts of truth and certainty. The paradox was part of the dialectical style of Greek scepticism, which was characterized, inter alia, by (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Commentary onMcKirahan.Patrick H. Byrne - 1995 - Proceedings of the Boston Area Colloquium of Ancient Philosophy 11 (1):298-306.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Proclus on Nature: Philosophy of Nature and its Methods in Proclus’ Commentary on Plato’s Timaeus.Marije Martijn - 2010 - Brill.
    One of the hardest questions to answer for a (Neo)platonist is to what extent and how the changing and unreliable world of sense perception can itself be an object of scientific knowledge. My dissertation is a study of the answer given to that question by the Neoplatonist Proclus (Athens, 411-485) in his Commentary on Plato’s Timaeus. I present a new explanation of Proclus’ concept of nature and show that philosophy of nature consists of several related subdisciplines matching the ontological stratification (...)
  • Demostración y silogismo en los Analíticos segundos: Reconstrucción y discusión.Fabián Mié - 2013 - Dianoia 58 (70):35-58.
    En este artículo se discute la relación entre silogismo y demostración con respecto al concepto aristotélico del conocimiento científico formulado en los Analíticos segundos. La argumentación sigue tres líneas principales: (i) se ofrecen razones para rechazar la relegación de la sistematización silogística a la instancia postrera de justificación y exposición didáctica del conocimiento previamente adquirido. Como respuesta alternativa, (ii) se muestra que una explicación aristotélica necesita la silogística en virtud del papel que desempeña la causa como término medio silogístico. En (...)
    Direct download  
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  • The Aristotelian Proto-Theory of Design.Lauri Koskela, Ricardo Codinhoto, Patricia Tzortzopoulos & Mike Kagioglou - unknown
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Hegel and Peircean Abduction.Paul Redding - 2003 - European Journal of Philosophy 11 (3):295–313.
  • Expanding the Use of Empiricism in Nursing: Can We Bridge the Gap Between Knowledge and Clinical Practice?Karen K. Giuliano - 2003 - Nursing Philosophy 4 (1):44-52.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Episteme, Demonstration, and Explanation: A Fresh Look at Aristotle’s Posterior Analytics. [REVIEW]Gregory Salmieri, David Bronstein, David Charles & James G. Lennox - 2014 - Metascience 23 (1):1-35.
  • Decompositions and Transformations: Conceptions of Analysis in the Early Analytic and Phenomenological Traditions.Michael Beaney - 2002 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 40 (S1):53-99.
  • History and the Future of Science and Religion.Hava Tirosh-Samuelson - 2010 - Zygon 45 (2):448-461.
    Philip Hefner identifies three settings in which to assess the future of science and religion: the academy, the public sphere, and the faith community. This essay argues that the discourse of science and religion could improve its standing within the secular academy in America by shifting the focus from theology to history. In the public sphere, the science-and-religion discourse could play an important role of promoting tolerance and respect toward the religious Other. For a given faith community (for example, Judaism) (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations