Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Closing the door on Hugo de Vries' Mendelism.Bert Theunissen - 1994 - Annals of Science 51 (3):225-248.
    Recent studies have shown that Hugo de Vries did not rediscover Mendel's laws independently and that the classical story of the rediscovery of Mendel is largely a myth. Until now, however, no satisfactory account has been provided of the background and development of de Vries' views on heredity and evolution. The basic tenets of de Vries' Mutationstheorie and his conception of Mendelism are still insufficiently understood. It has been suggested that de Vries failed to assimilate Mendelism and that he wrote (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   10 citations  
  • Why the Rediscoverer Ended up on the Sidelines: Hugo De Vries’s Theory of Inheritance and the Mendelian Laws.Ida H. Stamhuis - 2015 - Science & Education 24 (1-2):29-49.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Mimush Sheep and the Spectre of Inbreeding: Historical Background for Festetics’s Organic and Genetic Laws Four Decades Before Mendel’s Experiments in Peas.Péter Poczai, Jorge A. Santiago-Blay, Jiří Sekerák, István Bariska & Attila T. Szabó - 2022 - Journal of the History of Biology 55 (3):495-536.
    The upheavals of late eighteenth century Europe encouraged people to demand greater liberties, including the freedom to explore the natural world, individually or as part of investigative associations. The Moravian Agricultural and Natural Science Society, organized by Christian Carl André, was one such group of keen practitioners of theoretical and applied scientific disciplines. Headquartered in the “Moravian Manchester” Brünn, the centre of the textile industry, society members debated the improvement of sheep wool to fulfil the needs of the Habsburg armies (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Pairing in Mendel's Theory.Margaret Campbell - 1985 - British Journal for the History of Science 18 (3):337-340.