Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Fundamentality, Effectiveness, and Objectivity of Gauge Symmetries.Aldo Filomeno - 2016 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 30 (1):19-37.
    UNOFFICIAL ABSTRACT It is not clear (to me at least) whether certain metaphysical questions really demand explanation. In this article I propose an argument for why fundamental laws of nature (of a form similar to those of the Standard Model) would welcome an explanation. The argument relies on Curie's first principle and on a feature of the current laws of particle physics. I also argue that this feature allows us to understand the ``unreasonable'' effectiveness of mathematics in physics (5.2) and (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Time Reversal.Bryan W. Roberts - forthcoming - In Eleanor Knox & Alistair Wilson (eds.), Routledge Companion to the Philosophy of Physics.
    This article deals with the question of what time reversal means. It begins with a presentation of the standard account of time reversal, with plenty of examples, followed by a popular non-standard account. I argue that, in spite of recent commentary to the contrary, the standard approach to the meaning of time reversal is the only one that is philosophically and physically viable. The article concludes with a few open research problems about time reversal.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Symmetry Breaking.Elena Castellani & Radin Dardashti - forthcoming - In E. Knox & A. Wilson (eds.), Routledge Companion to the Philosophy of Physics. New York, USA: Routledge.
    A brief introduction to the physics and philosophy of symmetry breaking.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Rovelli on Disharmony Between the Quantum Arrows of Time.Bryan W. Roberts - unknown
    Rovelli argues that the there is disharmony with respect to the arrow of time from the perspective of testable predictions, as compared to the perspective of Schroedinger evolution, and uses this claim as evidence against realist interpretations of the wave function. I argue on the contrary that this disharmony arises only out of a non-standard definition of time reversal that ignores the 'big-T', and that harmony is restored when the standard definition is adopted.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark