Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Relative Versus Absolute Standards for Everyday Risk in Adolescent HIV Prevention Trials: Expanding the Debate.Jeremy Snyder, Cari L. Miller & Glenda Gray - 2011 - American Journal of Bioethics 11 (6):5 - 13.
    The concept of minimal risk has been used to regulate and limit participation by adolescents in clinical trials. It can be understood as setting an absolute standard of what risks are considered minimal or it can be interpreted as relative to the actual risks faced by members of the host community for the trial. While commentators have almost universally opposed a relative interpretation of the environmental risks faced by potential adolescent trial participants, we argue that the ethical concerns against the (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   17 citations  
  • Why We Don't Need a Relative Risk Standard for Adolescent HIV Vaccine Trials in South Africa.Catherine M. Slack - 2011 - American Journal of Bioethics 11 (6):21 - 22.
    The American Journal of Bioethics, Volume 11, Issue 6, Page 21-22, June 2011.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • When to start paediatric testing of the adult HIV cure research agenda?Seema K. Shah - 2017 - Journal of Medical Ethics 43 (2):82-86.
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • The Dangers of Using a Relative Risk Standard for Minimal Risk.Seema Shah - 2011 - American Journal of Bioethics 11 (6):22 - 23.
    The American Journal of Bioethics, Volume 11, Issue 6, Page 22-23, June 2011.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   4 citations  
  • Advancing independent adolescent consent for participation in HIV prevention research.Seema K. Shah, Susannah M. Allison, Bill G. Kapogiannis, Roberta Black, Liza Dawson & Emily Erbelding - 2018 - Journal of Medical Ethics 44 (7):431-433.
    In many regions around the world, those at highest risk for acquiring HIV are young adults and adolescents. Young men who have sex with men in the USA are the group at greatest risk for HIV acquisition, particularly if they are part of a racial or ethnic minority group.1 Adolescent girls and young women have the highest incidence rates of any demographic subgroup in sub-Saharan Africa.2 To reverse the global AIDS pandemic’s toll on these high-risk groups, it is important to (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Ethical considerations for involving adolescents in biomedical HIV prevention research.Andrew Mujugira, Kenneth Ngure, Juliet Allen Babirye, Joel Maena, Joselyne Nansimbe, Simon Afrika Akasiima, Hadijah Kalule Nabunya, Florence Biira, Emmie Mulumba, Maria Janine Nambusi, Stella Nanyonga, Sophie C. Nanziri, Doreen Kemigisha, Teopista Nakyanzi, Juliane Etima, Betty Kamira, Monica Nolan, Clemensia Nakabiito, Brenda Gati, Carolyne Akello & Rita Nakalega - 2021 - BMC Medical Ethics 22 (1):1-7.
    BackgroundInvolvement of adolescent girls in biomedical HIV research is essential to better understand efficacy and safety of new prevention interventions in this key population at high risk of HIV infection. However, there are many ethical issues to consider prior to engaging them in pivotal biomedical research. In Uganda, 16–17-year-old adolescents can access sexual and reproductive health services including for HIV or other sexually transmitted infections, contraception, and antenatal care without parental consent. In contrast, participation in HIV prevention research involving investigational (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Response to Open Peer Commentaries on “Relative Versus Absolute Standards for Everyday Risk in Adolescent HIV Prevention Trials: Expanding the Debate”.Jeremy Snyder, Cari L. Miller & Glenda Gray - 2011 - American Journal of Bioethics 11 (6):W1 - W3.
    The American Journal of Bioethics, Volume 11, Issue 6, Page W1-W3, June 2011.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation