Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Yesterday’s Child: How Gene Editing for Enhancement Will Produce Obsolescence—and Why It Matters.Robert Sparrow - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (7):6-15.
    Despite the advent of CRISPR, safe and effective gene editing for human enhancement remains well beyond our current technological capabilities. For the discussion about enhancing human beings to be worth having, then, we must assume that gene-editing technology will improve rapidly. However, rapid progress in the development and application of any technology comes at a price: obsolescence. If the genetic enhancements we can provide children get better and better each year, then the enhancements granted to children born in any given (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   25 citations  
  • Maurizio Meloni’s Political Biology : The hour of political biology: Lamarck in a eugenic key?Steve Fuller - 2018 - History of the Human Sciences 31 (1):97-103.
  • In Search of a Post-Genomic Bioethics: Lessons From Political Biology.Sarah Chan - 2018 - History of the Human Sciences 31 (1):116-123.
  • Heritable Genome Editing in a Global Context: National and International Policy Challenges.Achim Rosemann, Adam Balen, Brigitte Nerlich, Christine Hauskeller, Margaret Sleeboom-Faulkner, Sarah Hartley, Xinqing Zhang & Nick Lee - 2019 - Hastings Center Report 49 (3):30-42.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Let Us Assume That Gene Editing is Safe—The Role of Safety Arguments in the Gene Editing Debate.Søren Holm - 2019 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 28 (1):100-111.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation