Citations of work:

David J. Chalmers (1990). Syntactic Transformations on Distributed Representations.

22 found
Order:
Are we missing citations?

PhilPapers citations & references are currently in beta testing. We expect to add many more in the future.

Meanwhile, you can use our bibliography tool to import references for this or another work.

Or you can directly add citations for the above work:

  1.  47
    Conceivability and Possibility: Some Dilemmas for Humeans.Francesco Berto & Tom Schoonen - forthcoming - Synthese:1-19.
    The Humean view that conceivability entails possibility can be criticized via input from cognitive psychology. A mainstream view here has it that there are two candidate codings for mental representations (one of them being, according to some, reducible to the other): the linguistic and the pictorial, the difference between the two consisting in the degree of arbitrariness of the representation relation. If the conceivability of P at issue for Humeans involves the having of a linguistic mental representation, then it is (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2.  10
    Modeling Complexity in Musical Rhythm.Cheng-Yuan Liou, Tai-Hei Wu & Chia-Ying Lee - 2010 - Complexity 15 (4):NA-NA.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  3.  25
    Connectionist Semantic Systematicity.Stefan L. Frank, Willem F. G. Haselager & Iris van Rooij - 2009 - Cognition 110 (3):358-379.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  4. Systematicity Redux.Brian Mclaughlin - 2009 - Synthese 170 (2):251-274.
    One of the main challenges that Jerry Fodor and Zenon Pylyshyn (Cognition 28:3–71, 1988) posed for any connectionist theory of cognitive architecture is to explain the systematicity of thought without implementing a Language of Thought (LOT) architecture. The systematicity challenge presents a dilemma: if connectionism cannot explain the systematicity of thought, then it fails to offer an adequate theory of cognitive architecture; and if it explains the systematicity of thought by implementing a LOT architecture, then it fails to offer an (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  5.  14
    Semiosis in Cognitive Systems: A Neural Approach to the Problem of Meaning. [REVIEW]Eliano Pessa & Graziano Terenzi - 2007 - Mind and Society 6 (2):189-209.
    This paper deals with the problem of understanding semiosis and meaning in cognitive systems. To this aim we argue for a unified two-factor account according to which both external and internal information are non-independent aspects of meaning, thus contributing as a whole in determining its nature. To overcome the difficulties stemming from this approach we put forward a theoretical scheme based on the definition of a suitable representation space endowed with a set of transformations, and we show how it can (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  6.  6
    A Bound on Synchronically Interpretable Structure.Jon M. Slack - 2004 - Mind and Language 19 (3):305–333.
    Multiple explanatory frameworks may be required to provide an adequate account of human cognition. This paper embeds the classical account within a neural network framework, exploring the encoding of syntacticallystructured objects over the synchronicdiachronic characteristics of networks. Synchronic structure is defined in terms of temporal binding and the superposition of states. To accommodate asymmetric relations, synchronic structure is subject to the type uniqueness constraint. The nature of synchronic structure is shown to underlie Xbar theory that characterizes the phrasal structure of (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7.  12
    Toward a Connectionist Model of Recursion in Human Linguistic Performance.Morten H. Christiansen & Nick Chater - 1999 - Cognitive Science 23 (2):157-205.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   40 citations  
  8.  62
    Explaining Systematicity.Kenneth Aizawa - 1997 - Mind and Language 12 (2):115-36.
  9.  6
    Explaining Systematicity.Kenneth Aizawa - 1997 - Mind and Language 12 (2):115-136.
  10.  61
    Can Connectionists Explain Systematicity?Robert J. Matthews - 1997 - Mind and Language 12 (2):154-77.
  11.  4
    Can Connectionists Explain Systematicity?Robert J. Matthews - 1997 - Mind and Language 12 (2):154-177.
  12.  24
    Quantification Without Variables in Connectionism.John A. Barnden & Kankanahalli Srinivas - 1996 - Minds and Machines 6 (2):173-201.
    Connectionist attention to variables has been too restricted in two ways. First, it has not exploited certain ways of doing without variables in the symbolic arena. One variable-avoidance method, that of logical combinators, is particularly well established there. Secondly, the attention has been largely restricted to variables in long-term rules embodied in connection weight patterns. However, short-lived bodies of information, such as sentence interpretations or inference products, may involve quantification. Therefore short-lived activation patterns may need to achieve the effect of (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13.  9
    Subsymbolic Case‐Role Analysis of Sentences with Embedded Clauses.Risto Miikkulainen - 1996 - Cognitive Science 20 (1):47-73.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  14.  32
    Content, Context, and Compositionality.Keith Butler - 1995 - Mind and Language 10 (1-2):3-24.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  15.  8
    Reduced Memory Representations for Music.Edward W. Large, Caroline Palmėr & Jordan B. Pollack - 1995 - Cognitive Science 19 (1):53-96.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  16.  62
    The Cognizer's Innards: A Psychological and Philosophical Perspective on the Development of Thought.Andy Clark & Annette Karmiloff-Smith - 1994 - Mind and Language 8 (4):487-519.
  17.  25
    No Representations Without Rules: The Prospects for a Compromise Between Paradigms in Cognitive Science.James W. Garson - 1994 - Mind and Language 9 (1):25-37.
  18.  48
    On Being Systematically Connectionist.L. F. Niklasson & Tim van Gelder - 1994 - Mind and Language 9 (3):288-302.
    In 1988 Fodor and Pylyshyn issued a challenge to the newly-popular connectionism: explain the systematicity of cognition without merely implementing a so-called classical architecture. Since that time quite a number of connectionist models have been put forward, either by their designers or by others, as in some measure demonstrating that the challenge can be met (e.g., Pollack, 1988, 1990; Smolensky, 1990; Chalmers, 1990; Niklasson and Sharkey, 1992; Brousse, 1993). Unfortu- nately, it has generally been unclear whether these models actually do (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   9 citations  
  19.  15
    On Being Systematically Connectionist.Lars F. Niklasson & Tim Gelder - 1994 - Mind and Language 9 (3):288-302.
  20.  67
    The Connectionism/Classicism Battle to Win Souls.Brian P. McLaughlin - 1993 - Philosophical Studies 71 (2):163-190.
  21.  70
    Cognitive Systems as Dynamic Systems.Terence E. Horgan & John L. Tienson - 1992 - Topoi 11 (1):27-43.
  22.  30
    Towards a Connectionist Cognitive Architecture.Keith Butler - 1991 - Mind and Language 6 (3):252-72.