Citations of work:

David J. Chalmers (2015). Why Isn't There More Progress in Philosophy?

8 found
Order:
Are we missing citations?

PhilPapers citations & references are currently in beta testing. We expect to add many more in the future.

Meanwhile, you can use our bibliography tool to import references for this or another work.

Or you can directly add citations for the above work:

  1.  52
    Is There Progress in Philosophy? The Case for Taking History Seriously.Peter P. Slezak - forthcoming - Philosophy:1-27.
    In response to widespread doubts among professional philosophers (Russell, Horwich, Dietrich, McGinn, Chalmers), Stoljar argues for a ‘reasonable optimism’ about progress in philosophy. He defends the large and surprising claim that ‘there is progress on all or reasonably many of the big questions.’ However, Stoljar’s caveats and admitted avoidance of historical evidence permits overlooking persistent controversies in philosophy of mind and cognitive science that are essentially unchanged since the 17th Century. Stoljar suggests that his claims are commonplace in philosophy departments (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2.  17
    On Mizrahi’s Argument Against Stanford’s Instrumentalism.Fabio Sterpetti - forthcoming - Axiomathes:1-23.
    Mizrahi’s argument against Stanford’s challenge to scientific realism is analyzed. Mizrahi’s argument is worth of attention for at least two reasons: unlike other criticisms that have been made to Stanford’s view so far, Mizrahi’s argument does not question any specific claim of Stanford’s argument, rather it puts into question the very coherence of Stanford’s position, because it argues that since Stanford’s argument rests on the problem of the unconceived alternatives, Stanford’s argument is self-defeating. Thus, if Mizrahi’s argument is effective in (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3.  2
    Review of Harrell, Maralee What is the Argument? An Introduction to Philosophical Argument Analysis. [REVIEW]Fernando Leal & Joaquín Galindo - 2018 - Journal of Argumentation in Context 7 (1):108-116.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4.  55
    How Theoretical Physics Makes Progress. [REVIEW]Moti Mizrahi - 2018 - Metascience 27 (2):203-207.
  5.  13
    Big Philosophical Questions: Why They Matter and Why They Are Still Around.Iris Vidmar - 2018 - The European Legacy 23 (4):403-415.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6.  12
    Making Philosophical Progress: The Big Questions, Applied Philosophy, and the Profession.Brake Elizabeth - 2017 - Social Philosophy and Policy 34 (2):23-45.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7.  19
    Intra-Disciplinary Research as Progress in Philosophy: Lessons From Philosophy of the City.Shane Epting - 2016 - Philosophia 44 (1):101-111.
    Philosophy of the city has recently emerged as a new subfield, garnering global interest. While most inquiries in this area have ‘the city’ or an urban issue as common ground, particular approaches engage in a kind of study identified as ‘intra-disciplinary research.’ An intra-disciplinary approach draws from different areas of philosophy to address problems that extend beyond the limits of individual subfields. A close examination reveals that this practice challenges assumptions holding that definitively answering philosophical questions is the only path (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  8.  13
    The More Things Change the More Things Change. [REVIEW]Leonard Finkelman - 2015 - Metascience 24 (3):409-412.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography