Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Governing partnerships for development in post‐conflict settings: Evidence from a longitudinal case study in Colombia.Stella Pfisterer & Rob Van Tulder - 2020 - Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility 30 (4):44-60.
    Drawing on a longitudinal case study of a 10‐year cross‐sector partnership for development in Colombia, this paper makes three contributions to current discussions on new collaborative governance approaches in which business, non‐governmental organizations and development agencies jointly address development challenges. First, our study explores how partnerships can be successful in achieving longer term development while being designed as short‐term governance arrangements. Second, we shed light on how power asymmetries can shape partnership governance. Many studies have highlighted the negative aspects of (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Towards theorising corporate social irresponsibility: The Déjà Vu cases of collapsed forestry ventures.Tiffany C. H. Leung, Artie W. Ng, Andreas G. F. Hoepner & Maretno A. Harjoto - 2023 - Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility 32 (4):1452-1469.
    Business Ethics, the Environment &Responsibility, Volume 32, Issue 4, Page 1452-1469, October 2023.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Making Sense of Stigmatized Organizations: Labelling Contests and Power Dynamics in Social Evaluation Processes.Gro Kvåle & Zuzana Murdoch - 2022 - Journal of Business Ethics 178 (3):675-693.
    How do social audiences negotiate and handle stigmatized organizations? What role do their heterogenous values, norms and power play in this process? Addressing these questions is important from a business ethics perspective to improve our understanding of the ethical standards against which organizations are judged as well as the involved prosecutorial incentives. Moreover, it illuminates ethical concerns about when and how power imbalances may induce inequity in the burdens imposed by such social evaluations. We address these questions building on two (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Fit for addressing grand challenges? A process model for effective accountability relationships within multi‐stakeholder initiatives in developing countries.Esther Hennchen & Judith Schrempf-Stirling - 2020 - Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility 30 (3):5-24.
    Business is expected to contribute to grand challenges (GC) such as poverty within their corporate social responsibilities. Multi‐stakeholder initiatives (MSIs) have developed to a popular governance model to address GC. While existing scholarship has discussed the positive and negative aspects of MSIs, we know relatively little about how corporations within MSIs are held accountable. The objective of the study is to analyze the dynamics of accountability relationships between the corporate actor and the accountability forum to conceive a process model for (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • CSR for Happiness: Corporate determinants of societal happiness as social responsibility.Austin Chia, Margaret L. Kern & Benjamin A. Neville - 2020 - Business Ethics: A European Review 29 (3):422-437.
    Business Ethics: A European Review, EarlyView.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • Who Has a Seat at the Table in Impact Investing? Addressing Inequality by Giving Voice.Guillermo Casasnovas & Jessica Jones - 2022 - Journal of Business Ethics 179 (4):951-969.
    Despite recognizing the importance of impact investing in combating complex societal challenges, researchers have yet to examine the capacity of the field to address systemic inequality. While impact investments are intended to benefit vulnerable stakeholders, the voices of those stakeholders are generally overlooked in the design and implementation of such investments. To resolve this oversight, we theorize how the fields’ design—through its tools, organizations, and field-level bodies—influences its capacity to address inequality by focusing on the concept of giving voice, which (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation