Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Debate: Capabilities Versus Opportunities for Well-Being.Peter Vallentyne - 2005 - Journal of Political Philosophy 13 (3):359–371.
    Amartya Sen and Martha Nussbaum have argued that justice is concerned, at least in part, with the distribution of capabilities (opportunities to function). Richard Arneson, G.A. Cohen, and John Roemer have argued that justice is concerned with something like the distribution of opportunities for well-being. I argue that, although some versions of the capability view are incompatible with some versions of the opportunity for well-being view, the most plausible version of the capability view is identical to a slight generalization of (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  • Democratic Epistemology and Democratic Morality: The Appeal and Challenges of Peircean Pragmatism.Annabelle Lever & Clayton Chin - 2017 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy:1-22.
  • Capabilities and Freedom.Alexander Kaufman - 2006 - Journal of Political Philosophy 14 (3):289–300.
  • Elements of a Theory of Human Rights.S. E. N. Amartya - 2004 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 32 (4):315–356.
  • Poverty, Well-Being, and Gender: What Counts, Who’s Heard?Susan Moller Okin - 2003 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 31 (3):280–316.