Switch to: References

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. Why General Jurisprudence is Interesting.Julie Dickson - 2018 - Crítica. Revista Hispanoamericana de Filosofía 49 (147):11-39.
    In a recent article entitled, “Is General Jurisprudence Interesting?”, David Enoch answers his own question resoundingly in the negative. This article critically examines the character of Enoch’s claim, the presuppositions it rests on, and the way in which he seeks to establish it. Having argued that many of Enoch’s views in this regard hinge on a narrow and idiosyncratic understanding of the questions that general jurisprudence addresses, and of the relations between those questions and many other inquiries concerning the character (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Amorality Explained. Analysing the Reasons That Explain the Standard Conception of Legal Ethics.César Arjona - 2013 - Ramon Llull Journal of Applied Ethics 4 (4):51-66.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  • Beyond the Law-State: The Adequacy of Raz’s Account of Legal Systems in Explaining Intra-State and Supra-State Legality.Jennifer W. Primmer - 2015 - Ratio Juris 28 (1):149-158.
    I argue that there are two conceptions of ‘comprehensiveness’: 1) Raz’s strong conception whereby comprehensiveness entails supremacy, and 2) a weak conception whereby comprehensiveness does not entail supremacy. The latter is sufficient to distinguish legal and non-legal authorities, and unlike Raz’s notion of comprehensiveness, allows one to account for both intra-state forms of legality (e.g., the federal-provincial relation in Canada) and supra-state forms of legality (e.g., the European Union). Moreover, although it is ideal for legal systems to claim supremacy, it (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark