Switch to: References

Citations of:

Evolutionary models of cooperative mechanisms: Artificial morality and genetic programming

In Modeling Rationality, Morality, and Evolution. Oxford University Press. pp. 7 (1998)

Add citations

You must login to add citations.
  1. On the Rationalist Solution to Gregory Kavka's Toxin Puzzle.Ken Levy - 2009 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 90 (2):267-289.
    Gregory Kavka's 'Toxin Puzzle' suggests that I cannot intend to perform a counter-preferential action A even if I have a strong self-interested reason to form this intention. The 'Rationalist Solution,' however, suggests that I can form this intention. For even though it is counter-preferential, A-ing is actually rational given that the intention behind it is rational. Two arguments are offered for this proposition that the rationality of the intention to A transfers to A-ing itself: the 'Self-Promise Argument' and David Gauthier's (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  • The robustness of altruism as an evolutionary strategy.Scott Woodcock & Joseph Heath - 2002 - Biology and Philosophy 17 (4):567-590.
    Kin selection, reciprocity and group selection are widely regarded as evolutionary mechanisms capable of sustaining altruism among humans andother cooperative species. Our research indicates, however, that these mechanisms are only particular examples of a broader set of evolutionary possibilities.In this paper we present the results of a series of simple replicator simulations, run on variations of the 2–player prisoner's dilemma, designed to illustrate the wide range of scenarios under which altruism proves to be robust under evolutionary pressures. The set of (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   11 citations  
  • The Future of War: The Ethical Potential of Leaving War to Lethal Autonomous Weapons.Steven Umbrello, Phil Torres & Angelo F. De Bellis - 2020 - AI and Society 35 (1):273-282.
    Lethal Autonomous Weapons (LAWs) are robotic weapons systems, primarily of value to the military, that could engage in offensive or defensive actions without human intervention. This paper assesses and engages the current arguments for and against the use of LAWs through the lens of achieving more ethical warfare. Specific interest is given particularly to ethical LAWs, which are artificially intelligent weapons systems that make decisions within the bounds of their ethics-based code. To ensure that a wide, but not exhaustive, survey (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   6 citations  
  • Robots for the rest of us or the 'best' of us?Peter Danielson - 1999 - Ethics and Information Technology 1 (1):75-81.
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  • Designing a machine to learn about the ethics of robotics: the N-reasons platform. [REVIEW]Peter Danielson - 2010 - Ethics and Information Technology 12 (3):251-261.
    We can learn about human ethics from machines. We discuss the design of a working machine for making ethical decisions, the N-Reasons platform, applied to the ethics of robots. This N-Reasons platform builds on web based surveys and experiments, to enable participants to make better ethical decisions. Their decisions are better than our existing surveys in three ways. First, they are social decisions supported by reasons. Second, these results are based on weaker premises, as no exogenous expertise (aside from that (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations